Apigee vs IBM Rational Test Workbench comparison

Google and IBM are both solutions in the API Testing Tools category. Google is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #15. Google holds a 1.0% mindshare in APIT, compared to IBM’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Apigee

Read 88 Apigee reviews

611 Views
407 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

159 Views
88 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apigee

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

IBM Rational Test Workbench and Apigee are both popular tools for testing and API management. IBM Rational Test Workbench is favored for its comprehensive testing capabilities, while Apigee is preferred for its API management expertise.

Features: IBM Rational Test Workbench offers extensive test automation, integration with various programming environments, and robust reporting tools. Apigee includes powerful API management features, traffic management, security, and analytics.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Test Workbench users suggest enhancements in test execution speed and more intuitive navigation. Apigee users need improved documentation and reduced complexity in configuration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment of IBM Rational Test Workbench is complex, with some users needing more support. Apigee's deployment process is smoother thanks to clear instructions and efficient customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Test Workbench has a higher initial setup cost but delivers a solid return on investment. Apigee presents a more cost-effective setup with a faster path to ROI through efficient API management and analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Apigee vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apigee

Ranking in API Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (2nd)

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in API Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (19th), Test Automation Tools (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Apigee is 1.0%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ShawkyFoda

Senior Consultant at Goverment

Provides high visibility and control with good traffic monitoring

Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability. The replication process between Master and Slave for disaster recovery takes too long. Dependencies on analytics impact the performance of the user interface, which should be separate. The complex setup process on-premises, especially with multi-node installations, could also be improved. Additional control in product declarations, based on operations like POST and GET, is needed.

Read full review

reviewer1513668

IT Specialist, ITE at a government with 10,001+ employees

Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing

It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I'm still evaluating, but in terms of overall performance and stability, it's quite good."

"The security provided by the solution is excellent."

"Apigee is stable, and we have had the system running on Apigee servers for more than four years without any stability issues."

"I use it because it's simple, it automatically updates, and It hasn't given me any issues."

"The features I found most valuable are how the APIs are published, the whole process of finalizing the API, and then controlling it."

"I like implementing different policies, for example, rate-limiting policy."

"The capabilities are very powerful."

"A very functional solution."

More Apigee pros

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

Cons

"We need better performance monitoring."

"Better functionality for validating inputs and outputs would be helpful."

"The analytical aspect of it could be better. I think it is fair if Apigee lets you configure some of the metrics of the key details you want to monitor in terms of analytics."

"I don't have any notes for improvement."

"The initial setup for the on-prem solution is a little complex."

"Apigee could do more to make users aware of what is available in the add-ons."

"I see some lagging in regards to integration capacity"

"Apigee on premise is quite complex and it is always moving faster."

More Apigee cons

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They need to work on the cost of the solution."

"Since it was acquired by Google, we can get a license based on our requirements and the cost level will depend on cloud access and support."

"As most of the customers say, the tool is a bit expensive."

"It is a bit on the expensive side. Its licensing cost is a bit high, and that's where we've seen people going back on their decisions."

"My clients pay for a license."

"Apigee is slightly expensive, but again, it can depend on the type of usage. All things considered, it is slightly expensive."

"The tool is extremely expensive."

"The cost of the licensing is based on the number of API calls that are made."

More Apigee pricing and cost advice

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apigee?

We can customize the dashboard.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apigee

Compared 26% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Apigee

Compared 10% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 8% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

More Apigee Competitors

ReadyAPI Test vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apigee

April 2025

Download Apigee product report

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

April 2025

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Also Known As

No data available

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

Overview

Apigee is a platform for developing and managing APIs. Apigee offers an interface for your core services by wrapping them with a proxy layer which is then accessed by other developers. With Apigee, you can design and build APIs and then securely share their services and data without exposing any code.

Because app developers make HTTP requests to an API proxy rather than directly to your services, your services are separated from the developers. All the developer needs to know is the URL of the API proxy endpoint, necessary query parameters, authorization credentials (if they exist), and the response data format.

The API proxy isolates the app developer from your backend service. Therefore, you are free to change the service implementation if the public API remains consistent. By maintaining a consistent frontend API, existing client apps will continue to work regardless of changes on the backend.

Key capabilities of the Apigee API management platform include:

Security: Protect APIs, messages, and backends with configurable policies such as OAuth, API key verification, XML/JSON threat protection, and access control.
API gateway: Secure and mediate the traffic between clients and backends, and between a company’s APIs and the developers who use the APIs.
Developer portal: Attract and engage application developers, enabling them to discover, explore, purchase, and test APIs and register to access and use the APIs.
API console: The console helps developers learn and work with APIs.
API lifecycle management: Manage the process of designing, developing, publishing, deploying, and versioning APIs.
Automated documentation: Automate the development of API documentation and software development kits.
Machine learning: Utilize machine learning and analytics to generate actionable insights and reports.

API monitoring: Apigee offers monitoring tools for API troubleshooting, security, and optimization.

Reviews from Real Users:

Apigee stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its rich developer portal, its advanced analytics, and its central monitoring system.

Carlos R., a software architect at Caja Los Andes writes, “The central monitoring feature is the most valuable. It also provides security for the APIs and high availability for our use cases. Apigee is the best product in the industry in comparison to other API management solutions. It helps in fast development, which is a top point. It also supports a lot of industry standards and has excellent documentation.”

An associate vice president at a tech services company notes, “The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features. The authentication mechanisms are quite easily built into Apigee, which is something that most of the other products have also now started supporting.”

Google

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

Sample Customers

Adobe, advance.net, Amadeus, AT&T, Bechtel, Belly, Burberry, Chegg, Citrix, Dell, eBay, Equifax, GameStop, First Data, Globe, HCSC, Intralinks, Kao, Meredith, Mitchell, Orange, Pearson

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench

April 2025

Free Report: Apigee vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench

Find out what your peers are saying about Apigee vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apigee vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench report.

See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.