Apica vs Grafana Loki comparison

Apica and Grafana Labs are both solutions in the Log Management category. Apica is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7, while Grafana Labs is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Apica holds a 0.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Grafana Labs’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Grafana Labs users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

398 Views
42 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Grafana Loki

Read 18 Grafana Loki reviews

9,511 Views
5,299 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Apica

Grafana Loki

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Apica and Grafana Loki are leading monitoring solutions competing in the technology sector. Grafana Loki has the upper hand with its superior logging capabilities and integration features, appealing to users who prioritize these over Apica's competitive pricing.

Features: Apica offers comprehensive monitoring and alerting with an emphasis on performance data collection, detailed analysis, and robust support. Grafana Loki focuses on log aggregation, visualization, and seamless integration within the Grafana ecosystem, providing enhanced data insights and adding significant value to users focusing on log management.

Room for Improvement: Apica could enhance scalability, support more third-party integrations, and streamline its interface. Grafana Loki needs improved documentation, advanced alerting features, and better ease of use to cater to a broader user base. Users frequently highlight these areas for potential enhancement for optimal performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica is praised for straightforward deployment and active customer service, minimizing initial setup challenges. In contrast, Grafana Loki's deployment may require more hands-on effort but benefits from a supportive user community, making peer support a crucial resource. Apica's structured support ensures a reliable customer service experience.

Pricing and ROI: Apica is noted for its cost-effectiveness and predictable pricing, offering a solid ROI. Grafana Loki, while potentially more costly due to infrastructure needs, provides a strong ROI linked to its log management capabilities and integration benefits. Users find Grafana Loki justifies its price due to comprehensive features that enhance value.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Grafana Loki Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Grafana Loki

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

Grafana Loki

Ranking in Log Management

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grafana Loki is 8.7%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

Volodymyr Bondarchuk

Senior System Engineer at Novell

Integrations enhance monitoring but problem-solving proves challenging

Different types of integrations with various sources are the most helpful and useful features of Grafana Loki that I found for myself. As part of Kubernetes technology, I noticed benefits from using this product such as availability, configuration balancing, high availability solutions for high performance, and failover clustering. It provides a clear picture about the state of the system and gives needed information for taking action and quickly fixing problems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apica allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."

"APICa allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."

"With the ZebraTester, the ability to have and store dynamic variables, when setting up the monitors, means you can extract that value and use it in a subsequent service call. This is something that has made our lives easier... This is one of the features that I like the most because it helps us in configuring these services, in a certain flow, without the need to re-record the whole thing."

"One of the biggest advantages of moving to Apica is the ability get to a hybrid model with the architecture in the cloud and our agents on-prem. We also have access to Apica's cloud agent across the globe. That has changed the way that we have our load testing setup at this point. Previously, it was always internal. Now, with this change in the way it is implemented for load testing, we can test anywhere across the globe and from the list of agents available within Apica's cloud. If I don't have an agent available in a second location, it just takes an email to their customer support, then it is spun up within 24 hours. That flexibility has changed the way that we perceive our load tests, not just in the US, but globally."

"The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery."

"There are several features that are really good. The first one is the flexibility and the advanced configuration that Apica offers when it comes to configuring synthetic checks. It provides the ability to customize how the check should be performed and it is very flexible in the number of synthetic locations that it can use. It allows us to run scripts from different locations all over the world, and they have a really good number of these locations."

"Our application SREs do script checks in such a way that closely mimic our customers' actions using the platform. Because there are so many different ways and options to be able to configure checks to closely mirror your applications' capabilities, it provides a lot of optionality for teams to create the right type of check that can notify when there are any issues. At the end of the day, we want our monitoring tools to be able to catch any outage before our customers do. This is where Apica Synthetic does a great job."

"It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica."

More Apica pros

"There are new features like that pilot code and things like that for profiling."

"The best feature of Grafana Loki is that it integrates well with our other tool."

"The most valuable feature is the capability to set up alerts, which becomes necessary when we need to receive notifications for specific events."

"Grafana agent is very lightweight and does not cost significant resources of our cluster."

"Loki also utilizes the same service discovery mechanism as used by Prometheus. So, whatever labeled metadata you see in Prometheus, you have the exact same metadata in the Loki system. Given this level of intricacy and the attempt to address these challenges, I firmly believe that Loki deserves praise for the work."

"Loki significantly saves time in troubleshooting by quickly pinpointing network issues."

"Grafana Loki is easy to monitor and detect errors."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is an open-source tool that is stable and flexible."

More Grafana Loki pros

Cons

"When it comes to the way the internal agent is installed, because you can install an application on a server, I would love to see the application Docker-ized. If you could install internal agents using Docker or using containers, it would be easier for us to manage them and spin up internal agents."

"If you are adding any input file, the tool fails to capture the path."

"We have been focused on reducing polling times for synthetic checks. We have gone from 10 minutes down to five minutes for a pretty broad swath, but there is some appetite to reduce that further, which could be an improvement."

"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."

"The reporting part that we use for our executives needs a bit more customization capabilities. Right now, you can use only the three main templates for reporting. We would like to be able to customize them."

"Learning the tool has always been a little difficult from a scripting perspective because the framework is proprietary and unique. Once we became used to what it does and how to perform it, then it became easier for my team and me. I would like to see some of the testing steps be part of a more well-known language, like Java or Python. That would be a big improvement."

"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."

"Apica was a relatively new tool when I started using it. Although Apica had good documentation, it still felt less developed or advanced than a tool like LoadRunner."

More Apica cons

"It's not intended for proprietary services, so you have to struggle with configuration a lot."

"It would be beneficial if Loki could directly access Windows Server logs or events directly from the servers."

"Enhancing speed could be a game-changer, and while it might vary depending on the application, it's a factor worth exploring."

"In Grafana Loki, the creation of metrics is not so easy, making it an area that could be made easier."

"The Docker container partition feature needs improvement as they do not reuse the space and goes into a pending state."

"Visualization-wise, Grafana Loki's dashboard looks a little outdated compared to other open-source visualization tools like Chronograf."

"I do not see any areas for improvement at the moment."

"We had a well-structured dashboard with a functional query. However, an issue arose when the Kubernetes pod restarted. The statistics from our Grafana query would reset, dropping to zero and starting anew. This was particularly noticeable with linear graphs, which are expected to show consistent growth."

More Grafana Loki cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."

"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."

"I am sure that Apica's price will be lower than LoadRunner."

"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"Grafana Loki is a free, open-source solution."

"You can use the free version of Grafana Loki on-premises."

"The solution is open source."

"I find the licensing structure quite reasonable, as the free license effectively meets my requirements."

"Grafana Loki is an open-source solution."

"Since we are using the open-source version of Grafana Loki, we are not paying anything for the solution."

"The cost is less than other paid services like CloudWatch."

"I use the open-source version of the product."

More Grafana Loki pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

10%

Media Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Grafana Loki?

We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana Loki?

Since it is an open source tool, there are no charges or fees.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Grafana Loki?

I have no ideas at this moment about what could be improved in Grafana Loki.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 28% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 21% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 16% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Graylog vs Grafana Loki

Compared 28% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Grafana Loki

Compared 12% of the time

Wazuh vs Grafana Loki

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki

Compared 8% of the time

Seq vs Grafana Loki

Compared 6% of the time

More Grafana Loki Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

June 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Loki

June 2025

Download Grafana Loki product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

No data available

Overview

Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.

Experience the Apica Ascent Platform

Apica

Grafana Loki is a powerful log aggregation and analysis tool designed for cloud-native environments. Its primary use case is to collect, store, and search logs efficiently, enabling organizations to gain valuable insights from their log data.

The most valuable functionality of Loki is its ability to scale horizontally, making it suitable for high-volume log data. It achieves this by utilizing a unique indexing approach called "Promtail," which efficiently indexes logs and allows for fast searching and filtering. Loki also supports log streaming in real-time, ensuring that organizations can monitor and analyze logs as they are generated.

By centralizing logs in a single location, Loki simplifies log management and troubleshooting processes. It provides a unified view of logs from various sources, making it easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. With its powerful query language, organizations can extract meaningful information from logs, enabling them to gain insights into system performance, identify anomalies, and detect potential security threats.

Loki's integration with Grafana, a popular open-source visualization tool, allows users to create rich dashboards and visualizations based on log data. This combination enhances the observability of systems and applications, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions and improve overall operational efficiency.

Grafana Labs

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Grafana Loki

June 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. Grafana Loki

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Grafana Loki and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. Grafana Loki report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.