Apica vs Grafana Loki comparison

Apica and Grafana Labs are both solutions in the Log Management category. Apica is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7, while Grafana Labs is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Apica holds a 0.3% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Grafana Labs’s 7.9% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Grafana Labs users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

1,227 Views
466 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Grafana Loki

Read 18 Grafana Loki reviews

9,981 Views
9,981 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Apica

Grafana Loki

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Apica and Grafana Loki are leading monitoring solutions competing in the technology sector. Grafana Loki has the upper hand with its superior logging capabilities and integration features, appealing to users who prioritize these over Apica's competitive pricing.

Features: Apica offers comprehensive monitoring and alerting with an emphasis on performance data collection, detailed analysis, and robust support. Grafana Loki focuses on log aggregation, visualization, and seamless integration within the Grafana ecosystem, providing enhanced data insights and adding significant value to users focusing on log management.

Room for Improvement: Apica could enhance scalability, support more third-party integrations, and streamline its interface. Grafana Loki needs improved documentation, advanced alerting features, and better ease of use to cater to a broader user base. Users frequently highlight these areas for potential enhancement for optimal performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica is praised for straightforward deployment and active customer service, minimizing initial setup challenges. In contrast, Grafana Loki's deployment may require more hands-on effort but benefits from a supportive user community, making peer support a crucial resource. Apica's structured support ensures a reliable customer service experience.

Pricing and ROI: Apica is noted for its cost-effectiveness and predictable pricing, offering a solid ROI. Grafana Loki, while potentially more costly due to infrastructure needs, provides a strong ROI linked to its log management capabilities and integration benefits. Users find Grafana Loki justifies its price due to comprehensive features that enhance value.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Grafana Loki Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Grafana Loki

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (16th), IT Operations Analytics (6th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

Grafana Loki

Ranking in Log Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grafana Loki is 7.9%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Grafana Loki	7.9%
Apica	0.3%
Other	91.8%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

Volodymyr Bondarchuk

Senior System Engineer at Novell

Integrations enhance monitoring but problem-solving proves challenging

Different types of integrations with various sources are the most helpful and useful features of Grafana Loki that I found for myself. As part of Kubernetes technology, I noticed benefits from using this product such as availability, configuration balancing, high availability solutions for high performance, and failover clustering. It provides a clear picture about the state of the system and gives needed information for taking action and quickly fixing problems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery."

"It helps with releases because we monitor them in staging. We can tell if something is critically wrong before it gets into production, e.g., if it was load related or function related and also what was different in the dev stage. It then alerts us straightaway inside of our production monitors once it has been released. Therefore, it has improved how we run our systems since we monitor multiple environments."

"We see the benefit almost every day. It allows us to be alerted whenever there is a store that is not responding properly around the world. We do have a network operation center (NOC) who receives these alerts, immediately checking if everything is okay."

"Our application SREs do script checks in such a way that closely mimic our customers' actions using the platform. Because there are so many different ways and options to be able to configure checks to closely mirror your applications' capabilities, it provides a lot of optionality for teams to create the right type of check that can notify when there are any issues. At the end of the day, we want our monitoring tools to be able to catch any outage before our customers do. This is where Apica Synthetic does a great job."

"It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica."

"One of the biggest advantages of moving to Apica is the ability get to a hybrid model with the architecture in the cloud and our agents on-prem. We also have access to Apica's cloud agent across the globe. That has changed the way that we have our load testing setup at this point. Previously, it was always internal. Now, with this change in the way it is implemented for load testing, we can test anywhere across the globe and from the list of agents available within Apica's cloud. If I don't have an agent available in a second location, it just takes an email to their customer support, then it is spun up within 24 hours. That flexibility has changed the way that we perceive our load tests, not just in the US, but globally."

"There are several features that are really good. The first one is the flexibility and the advanced configuration that Apica offers when it comes to configuring synthetic checks. It provides the ability to customize how the check should be performed and it is very flexible in the number of synthetic locations that it can use. It allows us to run scripts from different locations all over the world, and they have a really good number of these locations."

"I like the transcript download feature. And with UI scripting, it's helpful that Apica handles a lot of the backend work automatically. I don't have to tag everything manually, though I can tag elements later if needed. It's really good at recording the steps."

More Apica pros

"Loki significantly saves time in troubleshooting by quickly pinpointing network issues."

"Loki also utilizes the same service discovery mechanism as used by Prometheus. So, whatever labeled metadata you see in Prometheus, you have the exact same metadata in the Loki system. Given this level of intricacy and the attempt to address these challenges, I firmly believe that Loki deserves praise for the work."

"Different types of integrations with various sources are the most helpful and useful features of Grafana Loki that I found for myself."

"The tool can be used in multi-cluster environments."

"The product's most valuable features are ease of installation, management, and reporting. It has an efficient ability to set thresholds for alerts, as well."

"Grafana agent is very lightweight and does not cost significant resources of our cluster."

"The most valuable feature is the capability to set up alerts, which becomes necessary when we need to receive notifications for specific events."

"The solution's stability has never been a problem. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine to ten out of ten."

More Grafana Loki pros

Cons

"There are some components of the user interface that are not up to date. Just to give you an idea, today we have web applications that are called single-page applications that are much faster than the old style of web application. If we can move faster into the flow of the graphic user interface, and in a more effective way, it will save us a lot of time."

"The having to install an application on your desktop to utilize something like ZebraTester is a little cumbersome. It would be nice to see that become a web-based application. Having the documentation a little more accessible, and easier to digest by people who are just learning how to use the framework, especially when it comes to more complex or more edge-based cases would be really helpful to have."

"It is difficult to create a script using ZebraTester."

"The initial screen on their dashboard could have a bit more data, but this is a small thing. It could have more data, so we do not need to drill down to a screen behind that initial information. I would like them to get a little better on the user interfaces that we need to go into."

"Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently."

"Learning the tool has always been a little difficult from a scripting perspective because the framework is proprietary and unique. Once we became used to what it does and how to perform it, then it became easier for my team and me. I would like to see some of the testing steps be part of a more well-known language, like Java or Python. That would be a big improvement."

"The tool does not provide automatic correlation features."

"Apica is costly, and there's no way to test mobile applications through Apica."

More Apica cons

"The platform's stability needs improvement."

"The solution's scalability depends on the team managing the Grafana instance."

"We had a well-structured dashboard with a functional query. However, an issue arose when the Kubernetes pod restarted. The statistics from our Grafana query would reset, dropping to zero and starting anew. This was particularly noticeable with linear graphs, which are expected to show consistent growth."

"There is a need for some change in the alerting types of the product. In short, a few changes in the alert area are needed due to minor shortcomings."

"Visualization-wise, Grafana Loki's dashboard looks a little outdated compared to other open-source visualization tools like Chronograf."

"My main concern is the recommended production-grade setup. They suggest using tools like Tanka or Jsonnet. They should simplify the process to increase adoption."

"It's not intended for proprietary services, so you have to struggle with configuration a lot."

"Enhancing speed could be a game-changer, and while it might vary depending on the application, it's a factor worth exploring."

More Grafana Loki cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."

"I am sure that Apica's price will be lower than LoadRunner."

"The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"The pricing structure varies based on the number of users; there might be specific taxes to pay for it."

"The solution is open source."

"I use the open-source version of the product."

"Since we are using the open-source version of Grafana Loki, we are not paying anything for the solution."

"The cost is less than other paid services like CloudWatch."

"I find the licensing structure quite reasonable, as the free license effectively meets my requirements."

"We use a free version."

"You can use the free version of Grafana Loki on-premises."

More Grafana Loki pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Media Company

11%

Insurance Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Grafana Loki?

We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana Loki?

Since it is an open source tool, there are no charges or fees.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Grafana Loki?

I have no ideas at this moment about what could be improved in Grafana Loki.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 28% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 27% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica

Compared 15% of the time

Grafana vs Apica

Compared 14% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Graylog Enterprise vs Grafana Loki

Compared 23% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Grafana Loki

Compared 13% of the time

Wazuh vs Grafana Loki

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki

Compared 9% of the time

Seq vs Grafana Loki

Compared 5% of the time

More Grafana Loki Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

October 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Loki

September 2025

Download Grafana Loki product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

No data available

Overview

Apica leads in observability cost optimization, empowering IT teams to manage telemetry data economics efficiently. It supports various data types, reducing costs by 40% with flexible deployment options and eliminating tool sprawl through modular solutions.

Apica Ascent optimizes observability costs across metrics, logs, traces, and events and provides adaptability beyond proprietary formats. Its patented InstaStore™ technology ensures maximum storage efficiency and advanced root cause analysis. Organizations leverage Apica for comprehensive control over observability investments, reducing runaway costs. With solutions for mitigating high-cardinality data challenges, Apica supports any data lake preference and offers cloud or on-premises deployments. Its modular solutions eliminate unnecessary tool redundancies, enhancing economic efficiency in telemetry data management.

What features define Apica's capabilities?

Global Presence: Extensive points of presence worldwide
Advanced Alerting: Accurate system notifications
Robust Scripting: Supports multiple protocols easily
Flexible Integration: Effortless system connections
Environment Simulation: Adapts various test scenarios globally

Which benefits should users expect from Apica?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces observability costs by 40%
Data Flexibility: Supports any data source
Modular Approach: Eliminates tool redundancies
Advanced Analysis: Enhanced root cause capabilities
Deployment Variety: Cloud and on-premises options available

Apica addresses industry needs in monitoring and testing applications, enhancing user experience across sectors. It is instrumental in synthetic checks, load testing, API monitoring, and validating functionalities for stability in gaming, finance, eCommerce, and banking platforms. Apica's versatility supports both on-premises and cloud environments, ensuring accurate insights into service availability and network performance.

Apica

Grafana Loki is a powerful log aggregation and analysis tool designed for cloud-native environments. Its primary use case is to collect, store, and search logs efficiently, enabling organizations to gain valuable insights from their log data.

The most valuable functionality of Loki is its ability to scale horizontally, making it suitable for high-volume log data. It achieves this by utilizing a unique indexing approach called "Promtail," which efficiently indexes logs and allows for fast searching and filtering. Loki also supports log streaming in real-time, ensuring that organizations can monitor and analyze logs as they are generated.

By centralizing logs in a single location, Loki simplifies log management and troubleshooting processes. It provides a unified view of logs from various sources, making it easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. With its powerful query language, organizations can extract meaningful information from logs, enabling them to gain insights into system performance, identify anomalies, and detect potential security threats.

Loki's integration with Grafana, a popular open-source visualization tool, allows users to create rich dashboards and visualizations based on log data. This combination enhances the observability of systems and applications, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions and improve overall operational efficiency.

Grafana Labs

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Grafana Loki

September 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. Grafana Loki

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Grafana Loki and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. Grafana Loki report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.