Apache Pulsar vs WSO2 Stream Processor comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Pulsar Logo
1,593 views|1,089 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
WSO2 Logo
176 views|154 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Pulsar and WSO2 Stream Processor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics.
To learn more, read our detailed Streaming Analytics Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Christian Bonami
Use WSO2 Stream Processor?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The solution operates as a classic message broker but also as a streaming platform.
Top Answer:The solution is open-source freeware.
Top Answer:Documentation is poor because much of it is in Chinese with no English translation.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
12th
out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
Views
1,593
Comparisons
1,089
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
470
Rating
8.0
28th
out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
Views
176
Comparisons
154
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Pulsar
Video Not Available
Overview

Apache Pulsar is a cloud-native, distributed messaging and streaming platform originally created at Yahoo! and now a top-level Apache Software Foundation project

WSO2 Stream Processor is an open source, cloud native and lightweight stream processing platform that understands streaming SQL queries in order to capture, analyze, process and act on events in real time. This facilitates real-time streaming analytics and streaming data integration. With the product’s powerful streaming SQL, simple deployment, and ability to adapt to changes rapidly, enterprises can go to market faster and achieve greater ROI. Unlike other offerings, it provides a simple two-node deployment for high availability and scales beyond with its distributed deployment to cater to extremely high workloads.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Transport for London
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company8%
Government7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise61%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Streaming Analytics
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache Pulsar is ranked 12th in Streaming Analytics with 1 review while WSO2 Stream Processor is ranked 28th in Streaming Analytics. Apache Pulsar is rated 8.0, while WSO2 Stream Processor is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Apache Pulsar writes "The solution can mimic other APIs without changing a line of code". On the other hand, Apache Pulsar is most compared with Apache Flink, Apache Spark Streaming, Amazon Kinesis, Amazon MSK and Azure Stream Analytics, whereas WSO2 Stream Processor is most compared with Apache Flink.

See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.