Anvilogic vs Trellix ESM comparison

"Before Anvilogic, we had no visibility into our detection coverage. The ability to break it down by industry verticals, such as attackers and adversaries, is valuable."

"One of the best things about Anvilogic is the partnership, their knowledge, the depth of technical understanding, and the speed at which they respond."

"The strongest part of Trellix ESM is that we get quite good reports."

"Trellix ESM is very user-friendly."

"The solution is 100% stable. We really have had a great time working with it. It hasn't let us down."

"It has good technical support, which is available around the clock. You can call up anytime and get whatever you want. My queues are resolved."

"It is user-friendly. The notification part of McAfee ESM is very easy."

"Trellix ESM utilizes fewer human resources and improves security and visibility."

"The tool's effectiveness depends on how you define your log sources. To build visibility of incoming and outgoing traffic, you need logs from perimeter defense, firewalls, web application firewalls, and endpoint protection. With good traffic visibility, incident response time is really quick."

"It is easy to use."

"The hunting insight needs integrable capability with different platforms to gather all of that insight and show it on a single canvas on Anvilogic. That is the only feature that could improve the way we do operations."

"The pricing is slightly edging towards being a bit much for smaller organizations."

"The user interface could be more user-friendly."

"The initial setup is difficult and could improve."

"I would like to see good analytics in future releases."

"Product-wise, adding accounts on a single data source by batch would be a really great help."

"We cannot add new data sources to the most recent version."

"I have to purchase a new box now. Its existing box is not scalable and I can't use it anymore."

"The only issue I have with McAfee is the amount of computer resources that it takes... it's definitely impacting some of the other applications that are running on a computer at the same time."

"It is not a very advanced solution, and it is for very generic use cases. It cannot cope with the advanced requirements that we're going to have. For example, for multiple authentication failures, it is still based on Windows events for detecting multiple login failures, whereas other companies are going beyond and working on implementing two-factor authentication. It is time to correlate the two-factor authentication results with authentification failures, which is not happening with McAfee ESM. The performance of the tool should be improved because it is very slow. The data display on the console is very slow in McAfee ESM. Its data storage is still old-fashioned, and it should be improved and upgraded to the latest versions. They have to come up with some new ideas to match what other leaders in the same domain are doing. For example, in Splunk, when you search for information for the last 60 days or five months, it quickly shows the information, but that is not the case with McAfee. The results should be quicker and faster on the console. They should integrate some additional features such as User Behavior Analytics (UBA) and automation. The threat intelligence part should also be improved on McAfee."

"We were an early adopter, so the pricing was definitely good. Because they do not completely replace a SIEM, their pricing is slowly edging towards being a little too much for a smaller organization like ours. It is almost on the border."

"Anvilogic's pricing has been highly competitive."

"We pay for our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"It is an inexpensive product. We purchase its yearly license."

"The licensing cost is based on EPS."

"The pricing is good, and they are competitive compared to providers such as RSA and IBM QRadar."

"The price of McAfee ESM is higher than some of the other solutions. There are additional features that can be added at an additional fee."

"When compared to IBM Security QRadar and other similar platforms, the pricing of McAfee ESM is reasonable and comparatively less expensive."

"We renew our license annually."

"The cost is all included. The finance department handles the financial part, and we mostly don't get involved in it."