No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Anomali vs CloudDesk comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Anomali
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (10th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (11th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (4th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (11th)
CloudDesk
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
21st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of Anomali is 3.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudDesk is 0.4%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Anomali3.3%
CloudDesk0.4%
Other96.3%
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
 

Featured Reviews

TarunKumar11 - PeerSpot reviewer
Global Leadership Council at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Strategic threat intelligence has improved detection speed and consistently reduces analyst workload
Anomali can be improved in various aspects. Its AI-driven automation can further advance, and AI-powered investigation summaries can improve. User experience could be enhanced through simplification of workflows. Better board-level cyber risk dashboards could provide easier visualization. Additionally, Anomali could work on simplifying the pricing structure. Although it excels in threat intelligence aggregation and operationalization, stronger GenAI capability, improved executive reporting, and a more intuitive workflow for analysts would further increase SOC efficiency and add more business value. Regarding Anomali's AI capabilities, governance and security are quite good. Anomali has incorporated AI and machine learning primarily to improve correlation and prioritization. These capabilities are valuable but could be more mature. The platform could achieve better threat correlation, prioritization, more anomaly detection, and allow AI to accelerate intelligence analysis while further improving quality and relevance. The accuracy and reliability of Anomali's AI output are fairly reasonable and good. The AI engine works well, but this capability could be improved. Better threat correlation with threat actors, certain indicators of compromise, malware, and campaigns is possible. Threat prioritization could increase, and alert noise could be reduced through further de-duplication. While reasonable, this is not the best available, and other products possibly have more AI maturity, such as Recorded Future and CrowdStrike Falcon.
reviewer2785116 - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Technology Service Support (Digital Channels) at a printing company with 201-500 employees
Remote monitoring has improved accountability and supports ethical workforce management
In terms of improvements for CloudDesk, I suggest enhancing analytics and AI integration, which could allow for predictive performance, anomaly detection, and smarter productivity scoring. It should also focus on improving collaboration and workflow integration, while providing greater customization and flexibility. I have observed that better communication tools could significantly enhance CloudDesk. While the software is very transparent, features that facilitate in-app communication about monitoring policies and data usage could further reduce employee anxiety related to monitoring software. Integrating a feedback loop, along with easy-to-use in-app channels for employees to provide feedback or contest performance metrics, could foster a stronger sense of being heard and valued.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Anomali has positively impacted our organization with many improvements since we started using it, as we receive many block hits from them, and we can say that our coverage has been extended to 90% because we do MITRE mapping."
"I have seen a return on investment with Anomali, as it improves analyst investigation time, enhances threat visibility, and supports fast incident responses."
"With Anomali, we benefit by obtaining threat information prior to incidents, making our threat hunts proactive and having incident response plans ready, which saves almost 40% of the time from the traditional model."
"I think it's one of the awesome tools I've worked with to date."
"I have found Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) very useful and concise. The solution is easy to use."
"We now have a very robust collection of threat intelligence based on the capabilities that Anomali provides."
"Anomali has positively impacted my organization because earlier we were not using any TIP format and were just dependent on open source, which gave us tons of irrelevant alerts, but with Anomali, we now get very specific and targeted alerts, allowing us to navigate through a handful of alerts that are applicable to us and saving a ton of working hours."
"The most valuable aspect of Anomali is the threat modeling capability."
"The impact of CloudDesk on my organization has been positive, as I have noticed an increase in productivity and efficiency due to optimized workflows, enhanced time management, and reduced idle time."
 

Cons

"One more improvement I would mention is regarding compromised credential monitoring. Anomali should increase their capability to fetch details from various dark web solutions where threat actors post compromised credentials."
"Support in the past has been top-notch, but recent trends indicate that it has taken a back seat, as we often don't get answers for days."
"I can mention one point regarding improvements for Anomali, which is more enhanced reporting flexibility."
"Anomali can be improved, specifically the Security Analytics feature, because I feel there is a slight lag in that."
"An area for improvement is the intelligence sharing within the Anomali community. The tagging system can be inconsistent, as any company can use any tags for their reporting."
"Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks."
"Anomali Enterprise could improve by combining all the other tools' features into one solution."
"My experience with Anomali's customer support has not gone so well for us."
"In terms of improvements for CloudDesk, I suggest enhancing analytics and AI integration, which could allow for predictive performance, anomaly detection, and smarter productivity scoring."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When comparing the price of Anomali Enterprise to other solutions it is in the medium to high range. However, I am satisfied with the price."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
910,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Construction Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise14
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anomali Enterprise?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that there are not many follow-ups, but once we interacted with the product team or the leadership of Anomali, they managed a lot with us, a...
What needs improvement with Anomali ThreatStream?
I can mention one point regarding improvements for Anomali, which is more enhanced reporting flexibility. The reporting provided to us is not too detailed and could be more enhanced. Better filteri...
What is your primary use case for Anomali ThreatStream?
I was using Anomali primarily for threat intelligence operations, security monitoring, and threat detection initiatives. I was part of the SOC team, and my role and responsibilities involved workin...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudDesk?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for CloudDesk is that I find it fairly reasonable.
What needs improvement with CloudDesk?
In terms of improvements for CloudDesk, I suggest enhancing analytics and AI integration, which could allow for predictive performance, anomaly detection, and smarter productivity scoring. It shoul...
What is your primary use case for CloudDesk?
My team's main use case for CloudDesk involves eight people focusing on how we provide support to all our users, usually for remote employees, monitoring, and analytics. We use it for time tracking...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Match, Lens, ThreatStream, STAXX, Anomali Security Analytics
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bank of England, First Energy, UBISOFT, Bank of Hope, Blackhawk Network
Hylife, Chedraui, Egyptian Military Academy, Lowe's
Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam, One Identity, IBM and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: July 2026.
910,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.