No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Anbox Cloud vs Docker on CentOS comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Anbox Cloud
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Application Virtualization (5th)
Docker on CentOS
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Operating Systems (OS) for Business (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Anbox Cloud and Docker on CentOS aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Anbox Cloud is designed for Application Virtualization and holds a mindshare of 1.4%.
Docker on CentOS, on the other hand, focuses on Operating Systems (OS) for Business, holds 0.5% mindshare, up 0.0% since last year.
Application Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Anbox Cloud1.4%
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)23.5%
Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS)15.3%
Other59.8%
Application Virtualization
Operating Systems (OS) for Business Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Docker on CentOS0.5%
Ubuntu Linux8.2%
Windows 117.4%
Other83.9%
Operating Systems (OS) for Business
 

Featured Reviews

IsaacHernandez - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Technical Lead QA at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Cloud-based Android testing has transformed how our teams reproduce issues and run remote QA sessions
Anbox Cloud can be improved mainly in ease of setup and operational simplicity. The platform is very powerful, but the initial configuration can feel complex, especially around infrastructure, networking, images, GPU support, and scaling. Better guided setup, clearer troubleshooting messages, and more production-ready templates would help a lot. I would also improve the monitoring and reporting experience, especially around session performance, resource usage, latency, and failures. For QA and operation teams, having clearer dashboards and logs would make it easier to detect problems quickly. Overall, it works well, but it could be more user-friendly for teams that do not have Linux, LXC, or cloud infrastructure experience. I would add that the documentation could be more scenario-based. The official docs cover the components, but real production examples would help more, specifically for scaling, GPU configuration, networking, image lifecycle, and troubleshooting failed sessions. Also, integrations could be stronger. Better out-of-the-box examples for CI/CD pipelines, monitoring tools, observability dashboards, and automated QA workflows would make adoption easier. I also would appreciate clearer guidance around cost optimization because when you scale Android instances in the cloud, resource planning becomes very important.
VV
Senior Software Engineeer at Charter Communications
Containerization has streamlined microservices delivery and ensures consistent hybrid deployments
The capabilities of Docker on CentOS that I have found the most valuable include its use for Spring-based applications, which significantly enhance the value I derive from it. Docker on CentOS is particularly effective for building distributed applications and microservices. Deployments are smooth and easy, and the integration with Kubernetes is seamless. I have successfully managed 80-plus pods clusters, scaling from 80 to 85 with 140 TPS without encountering any issues. Docker on CentOS's lightweight nature allows for flawless development across environments such as dev, stage, and prod. From my perspective, the experience with the deployment of Docker on CentOS is quite positive, especially for the CI/CD pipeline. The architecture overview includes the use of a Git repository and GitLab CI, which facilitates the Docker build for our Spring 3.x Java applications.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have an excellent experience with support from Canonical, as they provide great support and our experience with the support team has been excellent."
"Anbox Cloud has helped us deliver faster to the market, automating testing and significantly improving testing cycles and time by 60 to 70%, resulting in faster time to market and increased customer satisfaction, which is up by at least 70 to 80%."
"Anbox Cloud positively impacts my organization by enabling us to run over 100 Android instances on a single server and maximizing infrastructure efficiencies."
"Overall, Anbox Cloud is a strong platform when you need scalable Android environments in the cloud, creating a more controlled, repeatable, and scalable Android workflow for QA, demos, and remote validation."
"It helps run Android and system containers using Ubuntu Pro."
"Docker on CentOS has positively impacted my organization by reducing operation costs, providing more reliable service, and saving money for the company budget and on other tools."
"Since adopting Docker on CentOS with a DevOps model, it has positively impacted my organization by making deployments faster, scaling up has become much easier, and the management of services has become more streamlined."
"Docker on CentOS has positively impacted my organization as it helped us grow the business, and the customer was very happy with the services, thus revolutionizing the business."
"Docker on CentOS has positively impacted my organization by making testing easier."
"The best features Docker on CentOS offers include ease of management and Docker capabilities, and Docker images, Docker containers, and everything related to them help me significantly, while Docker's management on CentOS stands out for its efficiency."
"Docker on CentOS has positively impacted my organization by making big data easy to configure and deploy, and it provides a more secure and isolated environment."
"Docker on CentOS has positively impacted my organization as it saved us so much time about database installations."
"Docker on CentOS impacts my organization positively because Docker itself is a good tool to use."
 

Cons

"To improve Anbox Cloud, we can enhance the speed and flexibility of the platform."
"In Brazil, it is difficult to find technical professionals with OpenStack or this technology skills."
"Anbox Cloud can be improved mainly in ease of setup and operational simplicity."
"Docker sometimes has some network-related issues, such as the host network not working, so we switch to a different type of network, and regarding CentOS, we are not using any support since it is freeware, relying only on documentation which serves as our support."
"The security on Docker on CentOS needs to be highly improved to avoid threats around it and also help us protect better our stakeholders' data, more specifically patient data."
"Docker on CentOS can be improved by using the Terraform creation, pointing for a smaller CentOS version that we can create to just take exactly what we need to consume in our image."
"Docker on CentOS can be improved by being in sync with the OS updates."
"Whether Docker Swarm was really the best choice for smaller things, I don't know."
"However, it also needs to improve its security, upgrade the packages, and fix bugs, which is why I deducted three points."
"I wish Docker on CentOS's scalability could reach the level of what something like Kubernetes does, as it can scale to the heights of where Kubernetes gets to, and the integrations are much more widespread."
"Docker on CentOS can be very secure and well-governed, but that security only exists if it is configured intentionally; out of the box, it is not secure by default for AI workloads."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
60%
Construction Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
Outsourcing Company
21%
Construction Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise22
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anbox Cloud?
Our experience with pricing was that it was reasonable for the value, but it requires careful planning. The main cost came from AWS compute resources, storage, networking, and scaling Android sessi...
What needs improvement with Anbox Cloud?
To improve Anbox Cloud, we can enhance the speed and flexibility of the platform. We can focus on optimizing allocations and CPU scheduling, as we are experiencing load distribution issues and expe...
What is your primary use case for Anbox Cloud?
My main use case for Anbox Cloud is for developments and critical enterprise development requirements. I use Anbox Cloud for Android automation on demand across the public cloud, which includes clo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker on CentOS?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Docker on CentOS was that it was very easy. Docker on CentOS is open source.
What needs improvement with Docker on CentOS?
Docker on CentOS could be improved in the configuration parts and the setup part. If there could be a special tool that could easily deploy Docker on CentOS, that would help a lot of the tech commu...
What is your primary use case for Docker on CentOS?
My main use case for Docker on CentOS was to bridge the gap between moving from monolith architecture to self-healing architecture. The team used Docker on CentOS to transition from monolith toward...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: October 2026.
916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.