Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amplitude vs Heap vs Segment comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Web Analytics category, the mindshare of Amplitude is 16.6%, up from 12.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Heap is 5.9%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Segment is 4.5%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Shivendra Pratap Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Data from Amplitude has good properties for segmentation. allows real-time tracking, segmentation, and have a complex architecture
A few things could be improved. The part that we used didn't need much improvement, but for end-users, the real-time analytics based on Amplitude's data could be improved. * The visualization of the properties can also be enhanced. Basically, the visualization could be better, and the real-time analytics can be enhanced. * Currently, real-time analytics still has some delays. Amplitude could reduce latency to provide faster insights. For visualization, they could have more charts and graphs to give users a better picture of their data. * The query builder could be improved. Simplifying the query builder with a better interface would make it easier for regular users. It might be easier for developers right now, but going forward, Amplitude could make it more UI-based.
Janelle Block - PeerSpot reviewer
Monitors testing activities and perform roadmaps and ad-hoc requests
Heap is quite user-friendly, featuring a primarily no-code interface for primary stakeholders. Some technical skills are required for administrators. However, based on my experience, Heap's design effectively supports a self-service model, making it feasible for users to manage on their own Your data is only as good as how well you maintain it. If you want to keep a lean development team, you must invest in the right tools. In some business situations, where the team is small, and there is limited support for analytics, a highly effective tool is crucial. It is one of the fastest tools I've used for gaining insights without spending excessive time chasing data. I've resolved most issues on my own in a reasonable timeframe, improving the speed of servicing requests. Given its effectiveness, especially for teams with constraints, it's a worthwhile investment if you need a powerful tool that delivers insights quickly. Heap's recent acquisition by ContentSquare adds to its value, providing extensive integration options. Additionally, tools like Optimizely enable real-time testing and monitoring, helping to address common issues with testing programs, such as delays in analysis. This ensures that insights are surfaced and shared efficiently. As long as the backend data is properly tagged, a layperson seeking data can access insights quickly. They can generate reports and find the information they need within minutes. Overall, I rate the solution an eight-point five out of ten.
VikasAgarwal - PeerSpot reviewer
Simplify data management and analysis and offers built-in integrations for many data sources and destinations, reducing effort required for custom integrations
The main challenge is that the SDKs are pretty similar across programming languages, and they're not super flexible. They might not support certain use cases. It has a set of functions that work well if they fit your needs, but if you need something custom, you can't rely on the SDKs and have to use recipes. And using those recipes extensively isn't ideal. For example, we were getting leads from the D2C application, sending them to Segment, and then from Segment to HubSpot. If Segment could mimic HubSpot's API, we could leverage HubSpot's SDK capabilities even through Segment. But Segment's API is generic, so it doesn't do anything tailored to HubSpot. As a product designer, I know that would be hard to accomplish anyway. It's not a criticism, because I would probably design it the same way. But as a consumer, I don't care how it's designed; I care if it fits my use case. If not, how much effort will it take to make it work? That was the challenging part. It took a lot of time to integrate Segment and make it communicate with HubSpot in a certain way. So, the challenge is the lack of flexibility in the SDKs, given the capabilities of the destinations. From my experience, it's mostly fine. It could benefit from more customization capabilities. The product itself is good, but it would be awesome if it allowed you to write your own extensions to augment the CDP's capabilities. And another suggestion. It's not about a missing feature, but rather something Segment is doing that I personally don't think a CDP should do. It's like a mobile phone you use for watching videos, listening to music, and making calls. But to be a good mobile phone, you need to be the best at making and receiving calls, and texting. Everything else is a distraction. Instead of optimizing for those distractions, you should solidify the basics. To illustrate this, Segment has many capabilities that overlap with things like CRMs, campaign management systems, tracking systems, and so on. These capabilities can give a small startup a real kick-start, but as you scale, the capabilities other than the core CDP features don't scale as well. For example, it does campaign management, but it's not really a full-fledged campaign management system. When you're starting out, it's fine, it's great, it fits almost all your use cases. But as you grow from a two-person organization to a 300-person organization, you'll have to deal with more complexity. You'll likely need to look for a dedicated campaign management system and integrate it with Segment. Now, if you've been using Segment's campaign management for a long time, moving that part to a different system will be a roadblock.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We can create charts and bar charts for visualization purposes and check real-time data with the solution."
"Amplitude offers flexibility in real-time data analysis, allowing users to make immediate decisions."
"I loved using Amplitude because it allowed me to dive deep into product usage and analyze different customer segments."
"Other areas like cohort analysis, defining key events, and user properties were also well-suited for Amplitude. It is an easy tool to use."
"You can track customer behavior with your project, such as how the customer envisions, navigates, uses CPA, and every touch point on the website. You can plan to optimize the phases and the customer behavior of the journey."
"With its ability to easily define user events, one can easily detect how one can better optimize one's product to drive better retention and feature use."
"What I like best about it is the session replay feature. It saves a lot of time. I don't need to go and debug or replicate issues multiple times. We can go to the session replay for a few minutes. We can ask when the issue occurred, go to that time in the replay, and see whether the user made a mistake or if there's an app caching issue. That has been very helpful."
"The initial setup process was straightforward."
"Heap enables one to easily track how customers use one's applications on both the web and mobile."
"An immensely useful feature is the retention graphs with the ability to generate retention data for individual features."
"The reporting has helped improve investor relations and let us quantify our growth and progress with ease."
"Discerning application and UX weak points, driving better user retention."
"I like the straightforward way of connecting with various data sources and destinations. That's the most valuable feature. It has built-in integrations for a lot of them, so the overall effort required for integrations is relatively low."
 

Cons

"We have seen tagging issues with Amplitude in rare scenarios, which can be improved."
"The free features in Amplitude Analytics need enhancement."
"Setting up reports in Amplitude was challenging for me as a newer user."
"The visualization of the properties can also be enhanced. Basically, the visualization could be better, and the real-time analytics can be enhanced."
"It's more expensive."
"Their analytics could be more user-friendly."
"Based on my experience, there's some room for improvement. The application is a bit slow. Also, I must read through old documentation when I need to check for new features. It's not very user-friendly. Once you're in the application, it's easy because it has many features. But for first-time users, you have to go through all the documents, which can be challenging."
"The product could benefit from more advanced UI features."
"The challenge is the lack of flexibility in the SDKs, given the capabilities of the destinations."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is a little on the higher end, especially when considering scalability."
"Heap's pricing can be heavy according to the usage and requirements for control billing."
"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing was on the higher side but it wasn't excessively high."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Insurance Company
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Insurance Company
14%
Real Estate/Law Firm
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Media Company
6%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amplitude?
I loved using Amplitude because it allowed me to dive deep into product usage and analyze different customer segments.
What needs improvement with Amplitude?
The free features in Amplitude Analytics need enhancement. The limitations, such as not being able to use the splitti...
What is your primary use case for Amplitude?
I have been working with Amplitude Analytics for around one year, mainly using it alongside GMP products like Google ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Heap?
It's pretty costly, and they use the common model of impressions. It's impression-based pricing, which can be costly ...
What needs improvement with Heap?
From a user perspective, customizing the interface could offer more flexibility. Customizing and branding the visuals...
What advice do you have for others considering Heap?
Heap is quite user-friendly, featuring a primarily no-code interface for primary stakeholders. Some technical skills ...
What do you like most about Segment?
I like the straightforward way of connecting with various data sources and destinations. That's the most valuable fea...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Segment?
The pricing was on the higher side but it wasn't excessively high. It's definitely not tailored for the smallest busi...
What needs improvement with Segment?
The main challenge is that the SDKs are pretty similar across programming languages, and they're not super flexible. ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

ClearBrain
No data available
Segment.io
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Yik Yak, QuizUp, CrunchBase, Rhapsody, PlanGrid, Acquia, Patreon, SeatGeek, Etermax
Zendesk, Marketo, Ernst & Young, Salesforce
Nokia, rdio, Bonobos, LiveNation, Atlassian
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Amplitude, Matomo and others in Web Analytics. Updated: August 2025.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.