Amazon SageMaker and Darwin are key players in the machine learning platform category, with Amazon SageMaker appearing to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive integration with AWS, which enhances feature richness and deployment capabilities.
Features: Amazon SageMaker offers diverse features like Random Cut Forest for anomaly detection, integration with IDE for a seamless workflow, and impressive computational storage. Its support for automatic model tuning and deployment simplifies tasks for non-programmers. Darwin shines in model generation with efficient setup and accuracy, aiding businesses lacking dedicated data scientists by providing interactive suggestions and system integration.
Room for Improvement: Amazon SageMaker's interface could be more user-friendly, and its pricing structure simplified. Enhancements in scalability for big data and richer documentation are needed. Darwin could improve its automatic dataset assessments and usability of its UI, while expanding model capabilities to include non-supervised learning and better account management functionality.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon SageMaker is primarily used in public cloud scenarios, benefiting from AWS's robust support network, though user feedback on support responsiveness is mixed. Darwin is versatile in cloud deployment, offering good support, but relies on documentation and in-house expertise. Both require advancements in user guidance and support accessibility.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon SageMaker’s pay-as-you-go model can lead to high costs, attributed to complex machine selection and storage fees, though it provides significant ROI through feature extensiveness. Darwin offers a cost-effective pricing model, especially when compared to employing additional data scientists, yielding notable ROI depending on the organization’s specific use scenarios.
The return on investment varies by use case and offers significant value in revenue increases and cost saving capabilities, especially in real time fraud detection and targeted advertisements.
The technical support from AWS is excellent.
The support is very good with well-trained engineers.
The response time is generally swift, usually within seven to eight hours.
It works very well with large data sets from one terabyte to fifty terabytes.
The availability of GPU instances can be a challenge, requiring proper planning.
Amazon SageMaker is scalable and works well from an infrastructure perspective.
There are issues, but they are easily detectable and fixable, with smooth error handling.
The product has been stable and scalable.
I rate the stability of Amazon SageMaker between seven and eight.
Integration of the latest machine learning models like the new Amazon LLM models could enhance its capabilities.
Having all documentation easily accessible on the front page of SageMaker would be a great improvement.
Both SageMaker and Lambda are powerful tools, and combining their capabilities could be beneficial.
For a single user, prices might be high yet could be cheaper for user-managed services compared to AWS-managed services.
The pricing is high, around an eight.
The cost for small to medium instances is not very high.
These features facilitate rapid development and deployment of AI applications.
SageMaker supports building, training, and deploying AI models from scratch, which is crucial for my ML project.
This allows monitoring and performance grading, as I instantly know when someone has a bad call.
Amazon SageMaker is a fully-managed platform that enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. Amazon SageMaker removes all the barriers that typically slow down developers who want to use machine learning.
SparkCognition builds leading artificial intelligence solutions to advance the most important interests of society. We help customers analyze complex data, empower decision making, and transform human and industrial productivity with award-winning machine learning technology and expert teams focused on defense, IIoT, and finance.
We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
