Amazon MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Salesforce are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6, while Salesforce is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.5% mindshare in MQ, compared to Salesforce’s 9.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 7 Amazon MQ reviews

920 Views
635 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 58 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

2,412 Views
1,416 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Amazon MQ compete in the integration and messaging middleware space, with each product catering to distinct needs. Amazon MQ is often seen as superior due to its features, while MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is favored for pricing and support.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers robust API management, a comprehensive integration solution, and strong analytics capacities. It provides a unified platform for API management and integration iPaaS. Its key features include over 200 connectors for various applications and technologies, a powerful API management toolkit with out-of-the-box policies, and the ability to scale easily using new systems like Runtime Fabric. Amazon MQ excels in providing strong messaging solutions with effective AWS service integration. It is highly valued for its robust security, managed service aspect, and scalability, making it ideal for cloud-native applications.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform can improve by simplifying complex deployments, providing greater DevOps automation, and enhancing the user interface for less technical users. Additionally, offering more native integration features without the need for expert-level skills could enhance its user-friendliness. Amazon MQ could enhance its offerings by expanding documentation and support resources, improving interoperability with non-AWS services, and adding more advanced enterprise messaging features to compete with traditional enterprise solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon MQ benefits from easy deployment on existing AWS infrastructure and responsive customer service, making it straightforward to implement. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers versatile deployment options on CloudHub and on-premises environments, though it may require skilled personnel for setup. While MuleSoft provides comprehensive support resources, the seamless integration of Amazon MQ with AWS services simplifies deployment and reduces potential hurdles.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform involves a higher initial setup cost but offers extensive features that deliver significant ROI for complex integration needs. Its robust API management and integration capabilities are viewed as justifying the investment. In contrast, Amazon MQ presents a more cost-effective option with lower initial costs, particularly advantageous for businesses already utilizing AWS infrastructure. By offering managed services with minimal maintenance requirements, Amazon MQ can provide a quicker return on investment with its focus on messaging solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,469 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (4th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 3.5%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 9.1%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

AdnanKhan

Senior System Administrator at Ovrlod

Offers good web hosting capacity and security features, but price needs to be reduced

In terms of Amazon MQ's scalability and throughput capabilities, the tool is mostly accessible, stable, and competent with similar platforms. The tool's web hosting capacity and security features are good. The impact of the solution on process efficiencies depends on the clients. If the traffic is too high for a client, I suggest they go with Azure as it is more scalable and stable, while the support is good. I recommend Azure over Amazon MQ. Starting with Amazon MQ can be a bit tricky, but I know that the product is mature and the support is very good. The integration capabilities of Amazon MQ are flexible. I am not using AI with the tool. I would not recommend Amazon MQ to others. As a service provider, my company usually recommends cheaply priced and reliable solutions to our customers. Azure is one most reliable tool that comes at a good price point. Even Google Cloud is a super solution but for launching Google Cloud, support is not available, so one needs to do it with tutorials which are not completely available in YouTube. I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Tolulope A. Adeniji

Retired at a educational organization with 11-50 employees

Provides application integration and reduces time and effort during upgrades

One of the most valuable aspects was its impact on reducing time and effort during upgrades. Previously, SAP upgrades required significant coordination with multiple teams. Now, thanks to our streamlined integration approach, the SAP team interacts primarily with the integration team. When changes are needed, we simply create a new version. This allows application teams to migrate gradually from the old version to the new one, without extensive involvement from the SAP team. Moreover, our approach has improved reliability by eliminating duplicated efforts. Previously, different teams would often duplicate data sets due to inefficiencies in data naming conventions. We centralized data integration, ensuring that all applications use the same data set.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"The use of ACK is valuable."

"The most valuable feature is the full lifecycle management, including Anypoint Designer and Exchange, as well as Discofolio API."

"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."

"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."

"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."

"The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components."

"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."

"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"The pricing can be a little bit less."

"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."

"Mule Anypoint Platform should improve its pricing. In my experience, a customer using the sandbox version couldn't upgrade to the final version because it exceeded their budget. Another area for improvement is the login mechanism. We need to integrate with third-party products for strong authentication, but it would be better if MuleSoft had its own robust login mechanism."

"Over the years, Mule Anypoint Platform has undergone significant improvements. When I first started using it, the API gateway capabilities were fairly basic."

"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."

"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."

"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."

"The product is expensive."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"The product is still very expensive."

"The product comes complete at one set price including support."

"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform really needs to work on its pricing model because it's very complicated."

"Regarding pricing, I believe there could be room for improvement to align with user expectations."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

The message queue requires an improvement in the message template MQ link. If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

We are using Amazon MQ for our AI model. It's used for notifications and other services. We have an application for which Amazon MQ acts as a broker.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 33% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 29% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 16% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ

Compared 10% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

June 2025

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

June 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

June 2025

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.