Amazon MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Salesforce are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.7% mindshare in MQ, compared to Salesforce’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 7 Amazon MQ reviews

917 Views
761 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 59 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

11,835 Views
2,130 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Amazon MQ compete in the integration and messaging middleware space, with each product catering to distinct needs. Amazon MQ is often seen as superior due to its features, while MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is favored for pricing and support.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers robust API management, a comprehensive integration solution, and strong analytics capacities. It provides a unified platform for API management and integration iPaaS. Its key features include over 200 connectors for various applications and technologies, a powerful API management toolkit with out-of-the-box policies, and the ability to scale easily using new systems like Runtime Fabric. Amazon MQ excels in providing strong messaging solutions with effective AWS service integration. It is highly valued for its robust security, managed service aspect, and scalability, making it ideal for cloud-native applications.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform can improve by simplifying complex deployments, providing greater DevOps automation, and enhancing the user interface for less technical users. Additionally, offering more native integration features without the need for expert-level skills could enhance its user-friendliness. Amazon MQ could enhance its offerings by expanding documentation and support resources, improving interoperability with non-AWS services, and adding more advanced enterprise messaging features to compete with traditional enterprise solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon MQ benefits from easy deployment on existing AWS infrastructure and responsive customer service, making it straightforward to implement. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers versatile deployment options on CloudHub and on-premises environments, though it may require skilled personnel for setup. While MuleSoft provides comprehensive support resources, the seamless integration of Amazon MQ with AWS services simplifies deployment and reduces potential hurdles.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform involves a higher initial setup cost but offers extensive features that deliver significant ROI for complex integration needs. Its robust API management and integration capabilities are viewed as justifying the investment. In contrast, Amazon MQ presents a more cost-effective option with lower initial costs, particularly advantageous for businesses already utilizing AWS infrastructure. By offering managed services with minimal maintenance requirements, Amazon MQ can provide a quicker return on investment with its focus on messaging solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (5th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 3.7%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 8.6%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

AdnanKhan

Senior System Administrator at Ovrlod

Offers good web hosting capacity and security features, but price needs to be reduced

In terms of Amazon MQ's scalability and throughput capabilities, the tool is mostly accessible, stable, and competent with similar platforms. The tool's web hosting capacity and security features are good. The impact of the solution on process efficiencies depends on the clients. If the traffic is too high for a client, I suggest they go with Azure as it is more scalable and stable, while the support is good. I recommend Azure over Amazon MQ. Starting with Amazon MQ can be a bit tricky, but I know that the product is mature and the support is very good. The integration capabilities of Amazon MQ are flexible. I am not using AI with the tool. I would not recommend Amazon MQ to others. As a service provider, my company usually recommends cheaply priced and reliable solutions to our customers. Azure is one most reliable tool that comes at a good price point. Even Google Cloud is a super solution but for launching Google Cloud, support is not available, so one needs to do it with tutorials which are not completely available in YouTube. I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Mohan BS

Senior Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

A useful tool to integrate applications and for data transformations that need to improve in the area of price and support

The main area where improvements are required in the product revolves around budgeting. The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle. Mule Anypoint Platform is made available with many components, and whether users use them or not depends on their choices. For example, though there is a tool called Anypoint MQ, our organization prefers to pay and use Kafka, as we don't want to use MuleSoft Anypoint MQ. In Mule Anypoint Platform, there needs to be proper segregation to help users identify what they need and don't need, making it an area where users need to be careful when opting for MuleSoft. Mule Anypoint Platform is an integration tool and not an ETL solution. When a user has to deal with a huge number of data, then Mule Anypoint Platform should not be a preferred choice since it can only be used for lightweight purposes revolving around APIs. There is a need to have a clear architectural decision made before opting for Mule Anypoint Platform. When there is a requirement for heavy data transformation, then users need to decide whether to go with Mule Anypoint Platform or any other platform available in the market. Though the tool comes with many useful components, it depends on whether the user plans to use all of its features. Recently, the product has come up with a new feature that is similar to an API catalog. MuleSoft had come up with the UAPIM feature almost eight months to a year ago, which had some concerns in the area of budgeting. Whether you build APIs using Javacore or any other tools, they can be cataloged using MuleSoft's UAPIM feature, for which users need to pay an extra amount, making it an area of concern for users. It would be great if MuleSoft's support team could provide help with the area of Kubernetes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"MuleSoft's integration with Salesforce products makes it a preferred choice for those setups."

"The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components."

"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."

"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."

"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."

"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."

"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."

"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"The tool requires programming language."

"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."

"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."

"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."

"When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward."

"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."

"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."

"Mule Anypoint Platform should improve its pricing. In my experience, a customer using the sandbox version couldn't upgrade to the final version because it exceeded their budget. Another area for improvement is the login mechanism. We need to integrate with third-party products for strong authentication, but it would be better if MuleSoft had its own robust login mechanism."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"Regarding pricing, I believe there could be room for improvement to align with user expectations."

"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."

"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform really needs to work on its pricing model because it's very complicated."

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"The product comes complete at one set price including support."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

The message queue requires an improvement in the message template MQ link. If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

We are using Amazon MQ for our AI model. It's used for notifications and other services. We have an application for which Amazon MQ acts as a broker.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 34% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 26% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 14% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ

Compared 9% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

July 2025

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

August 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

July 2025

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.