Amazon MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Salesforce are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.5% mindshare in MQ, compared to Salesforce’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 8 Amazon MQ reviews

721 Views
620 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 60 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

10,232 Views
1,535 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Amazon MQ are competing in the integration space. Amazon MQ offers compelling features and ease of deployment, making it more appealing despite being less favorable in terms of pricing and support.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers a wide range of APIs and connectors, comprehensive integration solutions, and robust batch processing capabilities. Amazon MQ is noted for its ease of use, reliable message brokering, and high availability, providing seamless integration across diverse systems.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform can enhance its user-friendliness by reducing the need for high technical expertise and improving deployment simplicity. Better cost management options could also be beneficial. Amazon MQ could improve its pricing structures and expand its customer support services for more comprehensive assistance. It would also benefit from enhancing its scalability features to match complex enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform requires more technical expertise and time due to its complex deployment model. Amazon MQ offers a straightforward deployment process with efficient customer support, making it suitable for teams looking to minimize deployment time and resources.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is generally costly, impacting ROI unless its extensive functionalities are fully utilized. While Amazon MQ shows lower pricing satisfaction, its cost-effectiveness and swift deployment result in a better ROI perception for budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (4th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 4.5%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 7.7%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	7.7%
Amazon MQ	4.5%
Other	87.8%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

RamilCerrada

Solution architect at SM Supermalls

Has provided consistent functionality across on-premise and cloud while simplifying cloud integration

I have experience with on-premise setups using ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ, but with regards to AWS, I use it via cloud only. There's a free tier with Amazon MQ based on their website, which is a six-month free trial of a single instance, allowing per month usage of either ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ, five gig of Amazon EFS storage, and for ActiveMQ, it's 20 gig of Amazon EBS storage for RabbitMQ. I did not purchase Amazon MQ through AWS Marketplace. Amazon MQ has published information about having 650 hours of free trial usage. This can be found via the AWS website by searching for AWS MQ. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Amazon MQ an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Greg O

Senior Validation Engineer at Weir Group PLC

Integration workflows have become transparent and secure while error tracking is streamlined

The best features in MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for me are transparency between logging in or deploying and using different environments. Managing different environments for the transparency of error logins or how to trace traceability is very important. It's very easy to use and sort, so you can see where everything has gone right and everything has gone wrong. I'm aware of the drag-and-drop interface in MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, and it's very, very quick. It's very time-saving and very efficient. The security features on MuleSoft Anypoint Platform help maintain data integrity in my organization; I would say it's second to none. It's one of the best out there that I have worked with because of the encryption and decryption, and there are a lot of security aspects. I would assess the platform's data mapping and transformation capabilities as amazing. Automation has been straightforward; the transformation and mapping have been easy to use, easy to source, and from the source to the target. I would say it has been very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"Since we utilize AWS, it's easy to integrate Amazon MQ and work with other third-party software, as they have standard communications via API or native language."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."

"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."

"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature is the full lifecycle management, including Anypoint Designer and Exchange, as well as Discofolio API."

"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."

"The security features on MuleSoft Anypoint Platform help maintain data integrity in my organization; I would say it's second to none."

"Good interface, simple to use and stable."

"This is the easiest and best tool available."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"Monitoring capabilities are not yet fully developed, since it's a message broker service, so it focuses more on the health of Apache."

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."

"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."

"This becomes an expensive solution over time."

"The stability could be better."

"It should give better control over account management."

"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."

"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."

"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"The tool's pricing is cheaper than other RPAs' since it is execution-based. Other RPAs charge based on subscriptions."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	30

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

Amazon MQ needs to have data collected on performance to analyze trends for improvement. Additionally, some tools can suggest how to improve performance in terms of speed, time, and processing, whi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

I have some experience working with Amazon MQ.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 27% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 20% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 15% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Amazon MQ

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ

Compared 13% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 3% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

January 2026

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides API management and integration capabilities with scalability, ensuring seamless connectivity across systems.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers API management and integration capabilities within a user-friendly interface. With a range of connectors and the ability to handle integration patterns, it enables data integration across environments with support for API-led connectivity. High scalability, observability, batch processing, and tooling are key features, enhancing performance while simplifying deployment.

What are the standout features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

API Management: Comprehensive tools for managing APIs effectively.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates diverse integration patterns.
Connectors: Extensive library for connecting various systems.
Observability: Enhances monitoring and performance tracking.
Batch Processing: Manages large volumes of data efficiently.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Scalability: Adaptable to growing data demands across platforms.
Performance: Simplifies complex deployments and improves processing.
Flexibility: Supports multiple environments, from cloud to on-premises.
User-Friendly: Streamlines integration processes with robust tools.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is employed by organizations for API management and seamless integration across systems in industries like retail and e-commerce. It connects enterprise applications in environments such as SAP and Salesforce. Users leverage it for data transformation and synchronization, achieving efficient real-time processing and a middleware layer across systems.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.