

Find out in this report how the two Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
With Amazon Linux, selecting and launching instances on a public cloud provider means the machine spins up in fewer than ten seconds, making it efficient.
One great feature is LTS, which is long-term support provided by Amazon itself.
We saved 30% in terms of the cloud infrastructure.
Amazon has the best expertise and they are available 24/7.
Timely and helpful responses for performance, updates, or AWS integration issues.
It offers specific advantages and constraints depending on the use case.
The online support often redirects us to FAQs instead of connecting to a real person.
There could be more detailed guidance on new installations like Google Authenticator, as the process is often vague and lacks fine-tuned information.
There are features regarding QR code setup, compatibility, and security.
The beauty here is that we can scale it immediately, which also saves cost.
The scalability of Amazon Linux is very good; we run it on top of scalable EC2 instances, and we do not find any issues there.
Amazon Linux is highly scalable because it allows for EC2 instances to scale up and down based on what you want.
Firefox is slightly more efficient as it uses less memory.
I would just need to move the container I have set up on Cloud Run to a VM or cluster, which could be straightforward.
My applications had a high availability (HA) environment, so even when one availability zone was down, traffic moved to a different availability zone without any issues.
We evaluated Amazon Linux, and it is very stable.
Amazon Linux is very stable and is continually maintained by Amazon.
I consider Google Chrome Enterprise to be both stable and scalable.
Google Chrome Enterprise is stable, and I haven't faced any stability problems.
Documentation explaining the differences between Ubuntu and Amazon Linux would be valuable.
Since we are working in a real-time manner and need to scale things immediately, the time it takes to boot an instance and then deploy things is preventing me from giving it a perfect rating.
My advice for others looking into using Amazon Linux is to make sure the command line is easy and that Amazon Linux has more performance than other Linux environments and is more secure than other Linux environments as well.
If we have a laptop with basic configuration, it eats up a lot of RAM and slows down the system.
This causes hesitation in installing them due to concerns about hidden costs and inadequate information.
Regarding Google Chrome Enterprise improvements, they need to declare some security details; they are applying security but not publishing the details about the security applied.
With Amazon Linux itself, there is no cost associated with using it, so I would say it is very good from a pricing perspective.
I am paying around $300 to $400 per month because I use many services.
The pricing is free compared to many other operating systems that charge.
It's a bit on the higher side, but we prefer to stick with it because of the security, ease of maintenance, and the company's reputation.
The interface is optimized in terms of the UI and user experience.
Amazon Linux handles this automatically. It is optimized for EC2, AWS hardware and software, mostly secure and stable, and there is no additional cost.
In terms of service security, there are many constraint security protocols and policies that help me create our own networks, security groups, and inline policies.
Amazon Linux's security updates have been helpful in general because I have had to be more specific in using the Identity Access Management (IAM) service so that we can have role-based permissions in preference to just keeping it open.
The best aspects of Google Chrome Enterprise are its compatibility with everything, smooth management, and frequent security patching, which I find nice to use.
The security it offers is an advantage, which is crucial for us due to HIPAA compliance concerns.
Google Chrome Enterprise is my preferred browser over Firefox and Microsoft Edge.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon Linux | 0.5% |
| Google Chrome Enterprise | 0.6% |
| Other | 98.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Amazon Linux is a secure and stable distribution for cloud environments, optimized for AWS performance. It is widely adopted by developers seeking minimal disruption in deployment and management, offering a seamless operational experience.
Developed by Amazon Web Services, Amazon Linux provides an environment streamlined for performance on AWS infrastructure. By offering long-term support and regular security updates, it ensures crucial security and reliability. It is tailored to enhance cloud-centric application development, making it a preferred choice for developers needing efficient resource management. Its compatibility with a wide range of AWS tools and services makes it highly adaptable for cloud-native solutions.
What are the key features of Amazon Linux?In industries such as finance and healthcare, Amazon Linux is used to develop cloud applications that require secure data handling and robust performance. Media companies appreciate its flexibility and speed in managing high-demand scenarios, ensuring scalable content delivery and reliable performance.
Google Chrome Enterprise combines Chrome OS and Chrome Browser to enable work in the cloud. Manage users’ access to data, applications, and extensions without breaking a sweat. Work securely from anywhere, on any device. Your data is kept safe in the cloud.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.