We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability is excellent."
"EKS has security features that you can't find in competing solutions."
"It has valuable monitoring and insights features."
"I can use the autoscaling feature to manage and scale up infrastructure."
"It is the best service because it has proper security packages."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The tool works well with the nodes in AWS. It's scalability is also good in terms of architecture."
"Break down your application into small modules to improve resiliency"
"It saves time, makes your environment more secure, and improves compliance. PingSafe helps with audits, ensuring that you are following best practices for cloud security. You don't need to be an expert to use it and improve your security."
"PingSafe released a new security graph tool that helps us identify the root issue. Other tools give you a pass/fail type of profile on all misconfigurations, and those will run into the thousands. PingSafe's graphing algorithm connects various components together and tries to identify what is severe and what is not. It can correlate various vulnerabilities and datasets to test them on the back end to pinpoint the real issue."
"Support has been very helpful and provides regular feedback and help whenever needed. They've been very useful."
"The mean time to detect has been reduced."
"The management console is the most valuable feature."
"Atlas security graph is pretty cool. It maps out relationships between components on AWS, like load balancers and servers. This helps visualize potential attack paths and even suggests attack paths a malicious actor might take."
"PingSafe's most valuable feature is its unified console."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its storyline, which helps trace an event back to its source, like an email or someone clicking on a link."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"I would like Amazon EKS to be easier to configure on various environments like Windows or Linux installations"
"The goal and idea behind microservices are to always be available and capable of handling any load, no matter how many requests come through...All of these services are great, but I also think it would be useful to have the same technology available in a miniature resource size, enabling the same applications and services to run on a small machine."
"The solution should include a popup for clusters so that all relevant information is visible at the bottom of a page."
"An area for improvement in Amazon EKS is the user experience. The platform could be more user-friendly. Only an expert can manage and use it."
"Amazon EKS is not a solution that can be fully managed through automation, making it an area of concern where improvement is required."
"The overall stability of the product should be improved to prevent any loss of data."
"Amazon EKS should improve its integration."
"We recently adopted a new ticket management solution, so we've asked them to include a connector to integrate that tool with Cloud Native Security directly. We'd also like to see Cloud Native Security add a scan for personally identifying information. We're looking at other tools for this capability, but having that functionality built into Cloud Native Security would be nice. Monitoring PII data is critical to us as an organization."
"There's an array of upcoming versions with numerous features to be incorporated into the roadmap. Customers particularly appreciate the service's emphasis on intensive security, especially the secret scanning aspect. During the proof of concept (POC) phase, the system is required to gather logs from the customer's environment. This process entails obtaining specific permissions, especially in terms of gateway access. While most permissions for POC are manageable, the need for various permissions may need improvement, especially in the context of security."
"While it is good, I think the solution's console could be improved."
"Scanning capabilities should be added for the dark web."
"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."
"The resolution suggestions could be better, and the compliance features could be more customizable for Indian regulations. Overall, the compliance aspects are good. It gives us a comprehensive list, and its feedback is enough to bring us into compliance with regulations, but it doesn't give us the specific objects."
"We've found a lot of false positives."
"It does not bring much threat intel from the outside world. All it does is scan. If it can also correlate things, it will be better."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon EKS is ranked 15th in Container Security with 39 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Container Security with 77 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". Amazon EKS is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Linode and Rancher Labs, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security, AWS GuardDuty and Sysdig Secure. See our Amazon EKS vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
