No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 vs IBM SoftLayer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

Cloud Storage Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)3.2%
Dropbox Business - Enterprise7.3%
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP6.1%
Other83.4%
Cloud Storage
Public Cloud Storage Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Amazon S313.8%
Amazon S3 Glacier10.9%
Microsoft Azure File Storage8.1%
Other67.19999999999999%
Public Cloud Storage Services
Public Cloud Storage Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM SoftLayer1.4%
Amazon S313.8%
Amazon S3 Glacier10.9%
Other73.9%
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

VA
Regional Manager at Aspire Lifestyles
Security features impress while response times need improvement
We use cloud storage security, which is a virus scanner for their infrastructure, as a new addition. Other than that, it focuses on serverless features, such as Lambda and Aurora SQL server databases. CSS cloud storage security, which is offered by AWS, is integrated into our system. It functions as a virus scanner that monitors whenever any incoming file arrives. The AWS service is excellent security-wise, and I have seen some other features besides security, such as automatic scaling that helped us significantly. Regarding integration, it provides us with the benefit that our data is kept within our account only.
reviewer2774889 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Has reduced storage costs and improved data management through automated lifecycle and seamless service integration
The best features that Amazon S3 offers are high durability and availability with virtually unlimited storage, lifecycle management for automated tiering and cost control, versioning to retain and recover data changes, and integration with services such as Glue, Athena, EMR, Lambda, along with strong security via IAM roles, bucket policies, and encryption. These features help by ensuring data is always available, securely stored, and easily accessible for pipelines. Lifecycle policies reduce manual cleanup, versioning safeguards against accidental deletions, and integrations allow us to directly run analytics or trigger workflows without moving data around. Amazon S3 event notifications help automate tasks such as triggering ETL jobs or Lambda functions on new data arrivals, and features such as cross-region replication ensure data redundancy and compliance, while fine-grained access control makes it easy to manage permissions across teams securely. My organization has seen improvements in data accessibility, reduced infrastructure costs, and simplified data management through Amazon S3. We now have a unified scalable storage layer that supports analytics, backups, and migrations seamlessly, leading to faster workflows and better decision-making.
reviewer1032702 - PeerSpot reviewer
Global Principal Cloud Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Stable with excellent speed and agility
The most valuable aspect of the solution is simply to have the ability to host in a cloud form and out of the data center - the IBM big iron solution. It's the speed and the agility that really sell SoftLayer. The ELT versus ETL extract, transform and load versus extract, load, and then transform, the ELT method is what really sells SoftLayer. The ability to extract act from your current location, load into your future location, with limited change, and then be able to take the transfer actions slowly and methodically after you're in your new location is the part that really makes this awesome. The stability and scalability are quite good.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Elastic File Systems allow me to share data, provision, and manage capacity and performance in AWS."
"Amazon EFS offers the flexibility of scaling as needed without requiring pre-provisioned storage."
"Amazon EFS offers the flexibility of scaling as needed without requiring pre-provisioned storage."
"Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS."
"We can run code and deploy it whenever we want."
"I appreciate Amazon's extensive range of services, which makes it a favorable choice."
"The first valuable thing is it is scalable."
"The productivity of the customer has improved by around 30% by using Amazon EFS instead of a unique EC2 NFS instance."
"The most useful features of Amazon S3 are the intelligent multipart upload."
"The most valuable features of the Amazon S3 are its ease of use and integration"
"AWS is very, very stable; it's actually the most stable cloud service for S3 and all the services provided on the cloud."
"The most valuable features of Amazon S3 are the global availability, resiliency, and ease of access control."
"The most valuable features are unlimited storage, scalability, and performance."
"My organization has seen improvements in data accessibility, reduced infrastructure costs, and simplified data management through Amazon S3, resulting in a unified scalable storage layer that supports analytics, backups, and migrations seamlessly, leading to faster workflows and better decision-making."
"S3 is a great service offering numerous possibilities."
"Some of the most valuable features are how convenient and easy to use S3 is; it's nicely integrated with AWS and is available on the AWS console."
"The stability is the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."
"The ELT versus ETL extract, transform and load versus extract, load, and then transform, the ELT method is what really sells SoftLayer."
"The ability to extract from your current location, load into your future location with limited change, and then be able to take the transfer actions slowly and methodically after you're in your new location is the part that really makes this awesome."
"The solution is highly stable."
 

Cons

"It could be better in connecting with Windows Server instances."
"What should be improved in Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is the costing, as it should be reduced, but that depends on Amazon."
"EFS could be improved by including a one-click setup."
"Their response was not prompt, and it took them a while to figure out solutions. While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week."
"It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to."
"The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3."
"A notable limitation of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is that it does not support Windows."
"There are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption."
"The feature at present does not suffice most of the requirements of an enterprise-class organization."
"The tool's speed is comparatively low, especially considering that there are some other services where we can store data, like EBS."
"The product should enable users to create their own shortcuts."
"The main pain point that I have faced is the need for faster restore times from Glacier tiers, which could definitely be improved."
"The pricing and licensing are pretty complex. It needs to be simplified."
"The cost of the solution should be reduced."
"The installation could be more straightforward for inexperienced users."
"Maybe it could be a bit cheaper."
"The interface is hard to use for us. It should be simplified."
"The interface is hard to use for us. It should be simplified."
"For us, the versioning was an issue."
"For us, the versioning was an issue."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."
"It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."
"The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3. For one GB or ten GB of data, S3 is much cheaper. EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage."
"I would rate the pricing 7 out of 10."
"The product charges are based on the amount of data stored."
"The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment."
"Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay."
"With S3 Standard, there is not a charge for deletion of objects."
"The price of Amazon S3 could be less expensive."
"The price of Amazon S3 is competitive with other solutions."
"This solution has reasonable pricing and a low cost."
"The pricing for Amazon S3 is reasonable, so price-wise, it's a seven out of ten."
"The cost depends on the data we access."
"For pricing, I would give it a six or seven out of ten."
"The pricing can be improved."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
University
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business33
Midsize Enterprise18
Large Enterprise39
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to pe...
What do you like most about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?
The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?
We don't need to purchase it; we are just using it and paying Amazon as per the utilization. We make direct payments ...
What do you like most about Amazon S3?
We can easily connect to the AWS resources.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon S3?
Since using Amazon S3, storage costs have reduced by around 35% to 40% through lifecycle tiering, data availability i...
What needs improvement with Amazon S3?
The only downside is the scalability limitations. I don't know if that is from AWS or my subscription.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
S3, Simple Storage Service
CloudLayer
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend
Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
Whogohost Ltd., Skypicker, Infinity Computers and Communications Company, Grace Co. Ltd., Keyword, Uvionics Tech, Tennis Australia, immixGroup, Salesbox, Cxense ASA, Avnet Inc., Komsomolskaya Pravda, Seekr
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Google, NetApp and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: March 2026.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.