Allot DDoS Secure vs Arbor DDoS comparison

Allot and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Allot is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.3. Allot holds a 0.4% mindshare in DDOS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 9.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Allot users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Allot DDoS Secure

Read 1 Allot DDoS Secure review

242 Views
242 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arbor DDoS

Read 56 Arbor DDoS reviews

5,461 Views
5,133 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Allot DDoS Secure

Arbor DDoS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Allot DDoS Secure and Arbor DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Radware, NETSCOUT and others in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Allot DDoS Secure

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Arbor DDoS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of Allot DDoS Secure is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Arbor DDoS is 9.8%, down from 13.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Arbor DDoS	9.8%
Allot DDoS Secure	0.4%
Other	89.8%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

reviewer1767993

Senior Network and Security Consultant | Specialized Services at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Protects critical infrastructure from alerts but GUI needs improvement

If we consider a default setup without customization, I would rate it a ten out of ten. However, the initial setup can be time-consuming for specific requirements needing customization, possibly requiring extensive fine-tuning. With the detailed and specific features we require, along with the need for tuning and customization, the process can indeed take several weeks. Allot DDoS Secure's case of integration with existing infrastructure is not too hard.

Read full review

Sanjin Zuhric

Team Lead Network Engineer at Artco Group d.o.o Sarajevo

Reliable protection ensures robust network defense and simplifies DDoS management

I am not sure if we plan to use additional features because we have many vendors and platforms that we support. We use the main function and that is it. The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive. The licensing is subscription-based. From our sales department, they discuss that prices are very high. A potential improvement could be establishing a contract with Cisco to sell via their channel. This could be beneficial because we work extensively with Cisco. If you are a Cisco partner, you can sell Arbor DDoS. That would be good for customers that are Cisco-based because many customers in Bosnia are Cisco-based customers. BH Telecom, our main customer, sells Arbor DDoS to other customers for protection. They buy Arbor and sell the product services to others via Internet links. They sell add-on DDoS protection via Arbor DDoS. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, Arbor DDoS is not present in many customers. Some customers try to sell it, but they sell other vendors such as F5. Arbor DDoS is mainly seen in telecom operators but not much in other customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has good architecture, concepts, and diagrams to protect end customers. Machine learning, artificial intelligence, and pattern creation are its most valuable features. The tool's alerting systems protect critical infrastructure."

"The technical support of Arbor DDoS is good."

"The solution looks into volumetric attacks and gets them resolved."

"In the GUI, the packet capture is a very good option, as is the option to block an IP address."

"It's just one dashboard with mitigation. You decide which mitigation you want and at what threshold to do this or that. Its operation is pretty simple. It's easy."

"The most valuable features include the traffic categorization and control of the traffic. The filtering of the traffic is very precise. When you want to stop some traffic, you precisely stop that traffic."

"With real-time packet capture features, you can easily and quickly response."

"I highly recommend Arbor DDoS to others."

"We use almost all the features of Arbor DDoS, but it really depends on the customer’s requirements, so I can’t specify exactly which features we use. However, many customers appreciate the basic DDoS protection, especially those without specific protection needs. For example, financial companies benefit from the cloud DDoS protection. It’s a straightforward solution that effectively meets their needs."

More Arbor DDoS pros

Cons

"The tool's GUI and Java-based management platform needs improvement."

"The look and feel of the management console is a little old, excessively simple. If you compare it with other solutions, the look and feel of the console is like you're using technology from five or six years ago. It doesn't show all the technology that is actually behind it. It looks like an older solution, even though it is not."

"An improvement would be to provide information on how pricing is done on different customer levels."

"It is an expensive product, so there is room for improvement in terms of pricing."

"On the main page there are alerts that we are unable to clear, even though the issue has been resolved."

"Arbor's SSL decryption is confusing and needs external cards to be installed in the devices. This is not the best solution from an architectural point of view for protecting HTTPS and every other protocol that is SSL encrypted."

"The solution needs to enhance its features to compete with other tools."

"The implementation should be made easier."

"They should improve the reporting section and make it a little bit more detailed. I would like to have much better and more detailed reports."

More Arbor DDoS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Allot DDoS Secure's pricing a five out of ten."

"You need to find a way to get a good offering from Arbor by negotiating a price. That is the challenge."

"I'm a technical guy. But I know it's expensive compared to its competitors. After you have the on-premise solution, for your solution to be effective you have to subscribe to an "upper level," so there's another cost. There is also a subscription to cloud services, which is another cost."

"I don't know about the pricing details as our company's service provider offers us the solution as an inbuilt feature within the internet bandwidth they provide us."

"I believe that the price of Arbor DDoS falls under the bracket of medium to high price."

"I don't deal with the pricing, but it seems that you need to get basic support in order to upgrade the software and implement some patches."

"The price is a little high."

"Arbor's products are very expensive. Their competitors are cheap when compared with Arbor."

"Arbor DDoS is quite expensive, but all these solutions are expensive because they deal with confidential information."

More Arbor DDoS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Allot DDoS Secure?

The product has good architecture, concepts, and diagrams to protect end customers. Machine learning, artificial intelligence, and pattern creation are its most valuable features. The tool's alerti...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Allot DDoS Secure?

I rate Allot DDoS Secure's pricing a five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Allot DDoS Secure?

The tool's GUI and Java-based management platform needs improvement.

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arbor DDoS?

The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive. The licensing is subscription-based. From our sales department, they discuss that prices are very high.

See all answers

Comparisons

Radware DDoS vs Allot DDoS Secure

Compared 63% of the time

More Allot DDoS Secure Competitors

Radware DDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 13% of the time

Corero vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 6% of the time

A10 Thunder TPS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 6% of the time

More Arbor DDoS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

January 2026

Download Allot DDoS Secure product report

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS

January 2026

Download Arbor DDoS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Arbor Networks SP, Arbor Networks TMS, Arbor Cloud for ENT

Overview

Allot DDoS Secure is your first line of defense against both inbound and outbound attacks. It surgically mitigates volumetric DDoS attacks and isolates infected hosts, before either can impact your service and business.

Allot

Arbor DDoS offers a comprehensive defense system against DDoS attacks, integrating a user-friendly GUI and advanced threat mitigation technologies for enhanced network protection.

Arbor DDoS is recognized for its ability to manage high-volume DDoS attacks efficiently, providing extensive protection through real-time traffic analysis and automated threat detection. It utilizes advanced techniques such as blackhole and BGP Flowspec for effective threat management. Arbor's cloud signaling allows users to handle and mitigate volumetric attacks while maintaining service availability. Though it provides robust security features, users note potential improvements in auto-mitigation, scalability, and AI integration. Challenges like an outdated graphical interface, hardware stability, and false positives need addressing to further enhance its usability and integration with third-party systems.

What are the key features of Arbor DDoS?

User-Friendly GUI: Provides an intuitive interface for ease of use.
Effective Mitigation: Combats high-volume DDoS attacks effectively.
Predefined Filters: Simplifies threat management with pre-configured settings.
Real-Time Traffic Analysis: Offers insights into traffic patterns and potential threats.
Automated Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats without manual intervention.
Able to Handle High-Volume Attacks: Ensures extensive protection even under large-scale attacks.
Packet Capture and Integration: Facilitates comprehensive security analysis.
Cloud Signaling: Enhances attack traffic management through hybrid deployments.

What benefits should users expect from Arbor DDoS?

Enhanced Protection: Safeguards networks from diverse DDoS threats.
Improved Service Availability: Maintains business operations without disruptions.
Timely Reporting: Delivers detailed attack reports for proactive prevention.
AI Capabilities: Leverages AI for smarter threat mitigation strategies.
Comprehensive Security: Combines on-premise and cloud deployments for optimal defense.

Internet service providers and telecom companies commonly adopt Arbor DDoS to protect their networks and infrastructure from DDoS attacks. It is also implemented in financial and government sectors to ensure web application security and maintain high availability. Arbor DDoS supports a hybrid approach, utilizing both on-premise and cloud solutions to manage traffic efficiently and sustain service quality during attacks.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

TIER-1 Cable, Swiftel Networks, Bristol Virginia

Xtel Communications

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Radware, NETSCOUT and others in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.