Algolia vs Amazon AWS CloudSearch vs Azure Search comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Algolia Logo
919 views|697 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
1,971 views|1,670 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
1,890 views|1,610 comparisons
62% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Algolia, Amazon AWS CloudSearch, and Azure Search based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft and others in Search as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Search as a Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The Algolia solution really helped us to improve our conversion rate and click through rate."

More Algolia Pros →

"The initial setup is straightforward.""The most valuable feature of Amazon AWS CloudSearch is its ability to receive data quickly. You can access your data easily in a short time.""It's the best solution for any company. It has a hosting ERP system for any task. AWS is stable. AWS is more flexible and its elastic concept is a new concept. AWS is also very secure. It has many layers of security, like hardware security and software security. This is a big issue.""It is remarkably efficient and beneficial.""AWS CloudSearch's best features are good performance under high CPU and memory use, and ease of deployment and scaling.""The quality of the solution is good.""The most valuable feature of Amazon AWS CloudSearch is the cloud aspect. I do not need to have the physical infrastructure, everything is in the cloud.""CDN service reduces latency when accessing our web application."

More Amazon AWS CloudSearch Pros →

"Azure Search is well-documented, making it easy to understand and implement.""The amount of flexibility and agility is really assuring.""Creates indexers to get data from different data sources.""Because all communication is done via the REST API, data is retrieved quickly in JSON format to reduce overhead and latency.​""The search functionality time has been reduced to a few milliseconds.""It provides good access capabilities to various platforms.""Offers a tremendous amount of flexibility and scalability when integrating with applications.""The product is extremely configurable, allowing you to customize the search experience to suit your needs."

More Azure Search Pros →

Cons
"I think they could improve the analytics view."

More Algolia Cons →

"A reboot should be enhanced.""Maybe they are common in Egypt, but you should make a request on Amazon to create a function to monitor CPU performance, memory, and files. It is very difficult in AWS. I would tell them it should be simple, just drag and drop. I think they could develop this option so we can drag and drop to monitor performance of the processor and memory.""Security is a concern but they're working on it.""Regarding the period of propagation on CDN servers, sometimes we update photos or files and we don't see the update instantly. We need to wait for sometime.""The price of the solution can be expensive.""Latlon data type only supports single value per document. All other types support multiple values. We faced issues with this because we had scenarios where, for each document, we needed to store multiple latlon values for different geographical locations.""Index cleanup is sometimes painful. No easy way to clean indexes or a bulk of documents. Full indexing or regeneration of entire indexes sometimes gets stuck. In one instance, we had to delete the entire index and re-create it.""AWS CloudSearch's documentation isn't very clear. Also, the on-premise version of the solution is less stable than the cloud version."

More Amazon AWS CloudSearch Cons →

"They should add an API for third-party vendors, like a security operating center or reporting system, that would be a big improvement.""The pricing is room for improvement.""The initial setup is not as easy as it should be.""For SDKs, Azure Search currently offers solutions for .NET and Python. Additional platforms would be welcomed, especially native iOS and Android solutions for mobile development.""The solution's stability could be better.""It would be good if the site found a better way to filter things based on subscription.""For availability, expanding its use to all Azure datacenters would be helpful in increasing awareness and usage of the product.​""Adding items to Azure Search using its .NET APIs sometimes throws exceptions."

More Azure Search Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We are currently on a contract with Algolia for licensing and price."
  • More Algolia Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We chose AWS because of its cost and stability."
  • "There was no license needed to use this solution."
  • "Amazon AWS CloudSearch charging is based on how many resources you consume or and the solution is known to be a bit expensive."
  • "Our license costs around $4,000 per month."
  • "I'm not sure how much we pay a year. It might be around $30,000 a year."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one point is cheap, and ten points are expensive, I rate the pricing as medium or reasonable."
  • "In comparison to IBM and Microsoft, the pricing is more favorable."
  • More Amazon AWS CloudSearch Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "​When telling people about the product, I always encourage them to set up a new service using the free pricing tier. This allows them to learn about the product and its capabilities in a risk-free environment. Depending on their needs, the free tier may be suitable for their projects, however enterprise applications will most likely required a higher, paid tier."
  • "For the actual costs, I encourage users to view the pricing page on the Azure site for details.​"
  • "I think the solution's pricing is ok compared to other cloud devices."
  • "I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where one is the low price, and ten is the high price."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "The cost is comparable."
  • More Azure Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Search as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: The Algolia solution really helped us to improve our conversion rate and click through rate.
    Top Answer:We are currently on a contract with Algolia for licensing and price.
    Top Answer:I think they could improve the analytics view. I think they can improve by increasing the number of the terms that are… more »
    Top Answer:It is remarkably efficient and beneficial.
    Top Answer:In comparison to IBM and Microsoft, the pricing is more favorable. I would rate it eight out of ten.
    Top Answer:A reboot should be enhanced. There are issues with the VBC collection.
    Top Answer:The after-hour services are slow. It could be better.
    Top Answer:We use the solution to link the Active Directory account to Office 365.
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 13 in Search as a Service
    Views
    919
    Comparisons
    697
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    339
    Rating
    9.0
    5th
    out of 13 in Search as a Service
    Views
    1,971
    Comparisons
    1,670
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    367
    Rating
    8.2
    6th
    out of 13 in Search as a Service
    Views
    1,890
    Comparisons
    1,610
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    395
    Rating
    6.8
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview


    Algolia helps businesses across industries quickly create relevant, scalable, and lightning fast search and discovery experiences. Algolia’s mission is to make every search interaction meaningful and rewarding. Our hosted platform reduces the complexity of building relevant digital experiences. More than 7,500 companies like WW, Lacoste, Twitch, Medium and Stripe rely on Algolia’s enterprise-grade APIs to manage over 60 billion search queries a month.

    Founded in 2012, Algolia is backed by $74M in funding from Accel Partners, Alven Capital, Point Nine Capital and Storm Ventures. The team is headquartered in San Francisco with offices in Paris, London, New York, and Atlanta. To learn more, visit www.algolia.com.

    Amazon CloudSearch is a managed service in the AWS Cloud that makes it simple and cost-effective to set up, manage, and scale a search solution for your website or application.
    Amazon CloudSearch supports 34 languages and popular search features such as highlighting, autocomplete, and geospatial search. With Amazon CloudSearch, you can quickly add rich search capabilities to your website or application. You don't need to become a search expert or worry about hardware provisioning, setup, and maintenance. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain and upload the data that you want to make searchable, and Amazon CloudSearch will automatically provision the required resources and deploy a highly tuned search index.

    You can easily change your search parameters, fine tune search relevance, and apply new settings at any time. As your volume of data and traffic fluctuates, Amazon CloudSearch seamlessly scales to meet your needs.

    Azure Search is a search-as-a-service cloud solution that gives developers APIs and tools for adding a rich search experience over your data in web, mobile, and enterprise applications. Functionality is exposed through a simple REST API or .NET SDK that masks the inherent complexity of search technology. In addition to APIs, the Azure portal provides administration and prototyping support. Infrastructure and availability are managed by Microsoft.
    Sample Customers
    Birchbox, Twitch, Lacoste, Stripe, WW, Medium, Cousera, National Geographic, Zendesk, Magento
    SmugMug
    XOMNI, Real Madrid C.F., Weichert Realtors, JLL, NAV CANADA, Medihoo, autoTrader Corporation, Gjirafa
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise51%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Search as a Service
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft and others in Search as a Service. Updated: April 2024.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.