VMware Cloud Foundation and Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) both serve the competitive cloud services market. VMware is preferred for complex IT environments due to its robust feature set, while Linode attracts smaller businesses with its cost-effective simplicity and scalability.
Features: VMware Cloud Foundation offers comprehensive life cycle management, strong automation capabilities, and disaster recovery features crucial for data centers. It is favored for scalability and virtualization options and easily integrates with various services. Linode provides simple setup, rapid scalability, and cost-effective services, with a focus on ease of configuration and reliable performance, making it well-suited for smaller businesses.
Room for Improvement: VMware Cloud Foundation users call for better integration flexibility, pricing adjustments, improved life cycle management, and Federation capabilities. Technical support is another area for enhancement. Linode users want enhanced security features, more global data centers, and expanded service options such as role-based access support and managed database services.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Cloud Foundation excels in on-premises and hybrid deployment, though customers report mixed experiences with its customer service despite overall high ratings. It caters well to enterprise environments requiring substantial infrastructure. Linode is praised for its straightforward public cloud deployment, ease of setup, and responsive customer service, making it ideal for small projects.
Pricing and ROI: VMware Cloud Foundation is criticized for its high cost, offering extensive features that may exceed user needs. It's considered expensive for smaller companies despite savings compared to costlier alternatives. Linode's pricing is appreciated for being straightforward and affordable, facilitating cost-effective scaling without budget constraints, leading to potential increased ROI over time.
VMware Cloud Foundation allows cost and time savings by quickly deploying infrastructure requests and integrating automatic ticketing and backup services.
In terms of ROI, although VMware Cloud Foundation is expensive, it saves time in most cases, which indirectly saves costs for users.
They respond with relevant and easy-to-follow solutions.
They were very responsive to my issue.
There are times when support is unclear, and even VMware support personnel may lack familiarity with certain parts, causing difficulties.
Based on my nine years of experience with VMware, I would evaluate their technical support as effective.
The technical support from VMware Cloud Foundation deserves a nine out of ten rating.
For my usage, which is a small business, I rate the scalability of Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) around nine or ten.
When more hosts are added, performance goes slow.
VMware Cloud Foundation supports scalability and company growth.
VMware Cloud Foundation is quite scalable, receiving a rating of eight and a half to nine out of ten.
The stability of VMware Cloud Foundation is very high.
If one component fails to operate in a timely manner, the entire infrastructure can go down because everything is interconnected.
I am currently satisfied with the stability of VMware Cloud Foundation, though having started only two to three months ago, I am still in the monitoring phase.
The main area for improvement is the lack of a backup feature to the local hard disk or storage.
The main improvement I would like to see from Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) is the ability to duplicate the server as it is and initialize a new one with the same features.
It would be useful to have the option to sort or group by tags on the domains page.
VMware Broadcom needs to include auto resource allocation at the VM levels.
The maintenance cost has increased significantly, especially after Broadcom acquired VMware, with a shift from socket-based licensing to core-based licensing.
Each user needs deep knowledge of every aspect of virtualization.
I find Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode)'s pricing very competitive.
The cost has become very high, especially after Broadcom's acquisition, altering the licensing model to a more expensive core-based system.
When comparing prices of both clouds, AWS is cheaper because they offer a free section for practice.
The price is quite higher than some other vendors.
Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) is easy to use and has a fair price, making it accessible and straightforward, which is crucial when compared to other complex solutions.
Their support is really good. I can ask anything at any time, and they are able to resolve issues like reinstating deleted Linodes.
Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) is cheaper.
The solution now offers auto-deployment of VMs.
All features of VMware Cloud Foundation are valuable to us, as it covers every industry standard protocol and requirement protocol.
VMware Cloud Foundation allows for extensive customization, aligning with our customer requirements.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| VMware Cloud Foundation | 18.3% |
| Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) | 1.7% |
| Other | 80.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 27 |
Linode Pricing Page
CPU, transfer, storage, and RAM bundled into one simple price.
VMware Cloud Foundation makes it easy to deploy and run a hybrid cloud. VMware Cloud Foundation provides integrated cloud infrastructure (compute, storage, networking, and security) and cloud management services to run enterprise applications in both private and public environments.
We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
