Akamai App and API Protector vs Comodo cWatch comparison

Akamai and Xcitium are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Akamai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7, while Xcitium is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0. Akamai holds a 3.6% mindshare in WAF, compared to Xcitium’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Xcitium users who would recommend it.

Akamai App and API Protector

Read 28 Akamai App and API Protector reviews

3,054 Views
1,379 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comodo cWatch

Read 4 Comodo cWatch reviews

391 Views
228 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Akamai App and API Protector

Comodo cWatch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Comodo cWatch and Akamai App and API Protector compete in the cybersecurity domain, offering protection for web applications and APIs. Akamai App and API Protector appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and robust security capabilities.

Features: Comodo cWatch focuses on real-time monitoring, incident response, and a web application firewall. Akamai App and API Protector offers advanced protections like bot management, DDoS defense, and a comprehensive security suite, catering to businesses with high-security demands.

Room for Improvement: Comodo cWatch could enhance its feature set for broader security needs and focus on advanced threat detection enhancements. It may also benefit from expanding integration capabilities. Akamai App and API Protector could streamline its setup process, improve accessibility for less technical organizations, and offer more flexible pricing options to enhance value perception.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comodo cWatch is known for its straightforward deployment and accessible customer support, easing integration into existing systems. Akamai App and API Protector requires detailed setup but benefits from a strong service infrastructure to assist with implementation challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Comodo cWatch presents a lower entry cost, appealing to budget-conscious businesses with its economical pricing and effective protection measures. Akamai App and API Protector, despite its higher cost, provides a high ROI by effectively detecting and mitigating threats, suiting organizations prioritizing comprehensive security over cost savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai App and API Protector

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (4th), Cloud and Data Center Security (10th)

Comodo cWatch

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

28th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Akamai App and API Protector is 3.6%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Comodo cWatch is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Deepesh Singh

Senior Engineering Manager Cybersecurity at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Bot Manager and different features to manage threats

As a product, it has good capabilities, including professional support. However, it's risky for us to rely on AI for real-time traffic management. We use in-house analytics but avoid automatic actions due to their high impact. For example, I live in a developing country. Everyone has different types of phones, apps, and everything else. So, if someone is using a legacy phone, that is still a use case here. If AI decides that this is an end-of-life phone or end-of-life Android operating system, it starts blocking that traffic. We may potentially lose millions or probably thousands and hundreds of thousands of hits per second. Everything is all about how well we serve payments because we're into payments. So, AI is used for analytics but not for real-time decisions. We can't afford to block traffic based on AI models due to the variety of devices and operating systems our users have.

Read full review

Bernardo Murillo

Director De Netquatro at Netquatro

Alerts organizations if any malware is detected and removes it quickly

The solution allows me to change my logo. It gives me a white-label portal because I am a partner. OWASP has been the most effective in malware prevention. It can detect if the headers are okay and do FTP scans. We get alerts if we have some malware. It is removed very quickly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features are powerful and better than F5."

"They have a fantastic tool for analyzing and viewing your traffic."

"The most valuable feature is the custom rules feature. This is because many of our customers require a lot of custom rules. Because it's a very customized project for our customers, I think they have the best of everything already."

"The product has a good user interface."

"The solution can scale extremely well."

"It gives us a report of traffic. It gives us a report of the day-to-day URL traffic, and it also gives an individual report. If we reach out to Akamai, they give us the IPs as well."

"I have contacted the support team of Akamai... I am happy with their responses and answers to my problems."

"The product has a good UI."

More Akamai App and API Protector pros

"We get alerts if we have some malware."

"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."

"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."

Cons

"Akamai needs to focus on quickly responding to risks, even those that may potentially be of zero threat..Maybe some of the documentation is a little confusing. They have a lot of different places where you can go to get information, and some of the information is quite out of date."

"The pricing could be reduced a bit."

"There are some issues with pushing configurations across a network. It still takes about 20 minutes and that means to retract it's another 20 minutes."

"The performance of the cloud monitoring tool is low."

"I do not see any area for improvement. Akamai is already maintaining its own databases for the security concerns, vulnerabilities, and attacks that are there. If anything, they should have a solution in the infrastructure security area as well. They should not be only in cloud cybersecurity; they should also be in infrastructure security."

"Customer support has room for improvement."

"The solution could offer even more integrations."

"A lot of piracy happens in India and other countries. If there is a product for protection from piracy, it would be great. For example, there are multiple hackers that hack your event, and there are some channels that pirate and publish the event on some other website. We protect our streaming through DRM and different technologies. We are also protecting the website, but hacking is still happening. If they can work on protecting from piracy, it would be great."

More Akamai App and API Protector cons

"The portal is a little slow."

"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."

"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, I would say Akamai's pricing is competitive."

"The solution is not expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

"The product is expensive, but it is worth the money."

"The price they are offering is quite reasonable for premium customers, but it's very expensive if you're a small and medium-sized enterprises."

"If you want quality, you have to pay the price. Its price is fair. Their account managers are also very helpful. They help you a lot with pricing even though they are working with Akamai."

"There is no license at all for Akamai. They are going to charge us only for the usage."

"Its price is slightly high. Every company has a justification for the high price. Overall, it feels worth the money based on how the service has been structured, but we do negotiate it."

More Akamai App and API Protector pricing and cost advice

"Comodo cWatch’s first level, which has fewer features, costs $7."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Akamai Web Application Protector?

The product is user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Akamai Web Application Protector?

The price is higher than others. It could be about 80% to 70% more expensive than other tools. So, it’s not just a slight difference.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Akamai Web Application Protector?

It could have better analytics and reporting visibility in the OEM console.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Comodo cWatch?

The portal is a little slow. I have to wait for it to load all the information. CDN's performance must be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Comodo cWatch?

I use the solution to detect vulnerabilities in the site.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo cWatch?

Comodo cWatch’s price is very good compared to Cloudflare’s. The first level of Cloudflare costs us about $20. The next level costs $100. Comodo cWatch’s first level, which has fewer features, cost...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 11% of the time

AWS WAF vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 10% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudflare vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 8% of the time

Arbor DDoS vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 8% of the time

More Akamai App and API Protector Competitors

Atomic ModSecurity Rules vs Comodo cWatch

Compared 59% of the time

Cloudflare vs Comodo cWatch

Compared 20% of the time

AWS WAF vs Comodo cWatch

Compared 12% of the time

Uplynk vs Comodo cWatch

Compared 9% of the time

More Comodo cWatch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector

June 2025

Download Akamai App and API Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

CDN

June 2025

Download Comodo cWatch product report

Also Known As

Akamai Web Application Protector, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Akamai Kona DDoS Defender

cWatch

Overview

Akamai App and API Protector provides website security by preventing DDoS attacks, acting as an application firewall, managing content delivery, and monitoring APIs. It adapts to threat profiles and is used for fast media delivery and identifying malicious activities.

Akamai App and API Protector offers strong protection, adaptable security features, and efficient traffic management. Its WAF blocks IP addresses and country-specific threats while preventing SQL injections. Companies utilize it for scalable CDN services and comprehensive traffic analysis. Known for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly dashboard, this protector stands out for its customizable rules and technical support. Users also highlight the ease of integration and detailed attack insights available through its advanced dashboard.

What are the key features of Akamai App and API Protector?

DDoS Protection: Strong defense against Distributed Denial of Service attacks.
Scalable CDN: Manages content delivery efficiently under high traffic loads.
WAF Capabilities: Blocks specific IPs and countries, prevents SQL injections.
Traffic Filtering: Analyzes and controls incoming requests to maintain security.
Adaptive Stream Delivery: Adjusts content delivery to meet bandwidth needs.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust security tools at a competitive price.
Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Scalability: Easily handles increasing traffic and data loads.
Ease of Integration: Simple integration with existing systems.
Insightful Analytics: Offers data-driven insights into traffic and attack patterns.

In media, Akamai App and API Protector ensures smooth streaming by handling high bandwidth demands. E-commerce companies use it to guard against fraud and data breaches. Financial sectors rely on its ability to protect sensitive transactions. Implementations in healthcare focus on safeguarding patient data while maintaining compliance with regulations.

Akamai

Cwatch delivers robust website protection from hackers - while it helps you stay calm when online. It does not just stop with protection but helps in scanning the website to remove malware instantly. It is a complete website security tool that delivers state-of-the-art protection techniques to ensure SMB website security from simple to complex threat landscape. It ensures early threat detection, instant solution and sophisticated preventive measures.

Xcitium

Sample Customers

Douglas Omaha Technology Commission, ZALORA, PrintPlanet

Xerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch

June 2025

Free Report: Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai App and API Protector vs. Comodo cWatch report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.