Airtable vs LiquidPlanner comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Airtable and LiquidPlanner are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Airtable is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0, while LiquidPlanner is ranked #26. Airtable holds a 1.3% mindshare in PMS, compared to LiquidPlanner’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Airtable users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of LiquidPlanner users who would recommend it.

Airtable

Read 19 Airtable reviews

6,690 Views
2,342 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LiquidPlanner

Read 3 LiquidPlanner reviews

2,130 Views
1,789 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Airtable

LiquidPlanner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

LiquidPlanner and Airtable are competing products in project and database management. LiquidPlanner has the upper hand in detailed task prioritization, while Airtable shines in offering versatility and flexibility across projects.

Features: LiquidPlanner offers predictive scheduling, resource management, and time tracking, enhancing detailed project oversight. Airtable provides customizable workflows, data linking, and a modular approach, enabling flexibility in handling various business tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiquidPlanner's deployment process is in-depth, requiring dedicated onboarding but ensures extensive customer service. Airtable offers a straightforward deployment with strong collaboration tools and a user-friendly interface, resulting in quicker deployment and efficient support.

Pricing and ROI: LiquidPlanner's higher setup cost, reflecting its premium services, suggests a longer ROI period. Airtable presents a lower initial cost, leading to quicker ROI for flexible solutions without extensive investment. Airtable offers better value for cost-effective project needs, while LiquidPlanner justifies higher costs with robust management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Airtable vs. LiquidPlanner Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Airtable vs. LiquidPlanner

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Airtable

Ranking in Project Management Software

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No-Code Development Platforms (3rd), Product Management Software (1st), AI Data Analysis (11th), AI Sales & Marketing (5th)

LiquidPlanner

Ranking in Project Management Software

26th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Airtable is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiquidPlanner is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Airtable	1.3%
LiquidPlanner	1.0%
Other	97.7%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Favour Emosivbe

Automation Specialist at ZapWorx

Has required stronger collaboration features while still supporting complex project workflows

The best features in Airtable include the flexibility and the fact that I could create relational databases. Before I started using Airtable, I was using Excel which didn't offer these capabilities. The ability to create relationships between tables and see through what's working in other departments is great for me. I can do scripting and work on large data sets on Airtable. It makes it easy for me, as working on those data sets on Excel tends to slow me down, but on Airtable, it's much faster. I can integrate Airtable with other platforms; aside from the native integration where I can send notifications to Slack teams and messages to Gmail, I can also connect with Make.com to share data. The interface on Airtable is exceptional. Working for my clients, when a client didn't want access given to all teams, we structured that on the interface and the different teams got different access to different tables. Airtable's rich field types help in organizing complex data for my team. The advanced field types work exceptionally with features such as linking records together. I can link records from other tables and see what's happening, use the lookup field, the roll-up field, and the count field to see what's occurring in other departments and generate insights. Unlike other CRMs, data cannot enter if it's not properly structured. If I want to input an email and it's not valid, it won't allow it because it expects the data to be structured appropriately.

Read full review

Paul Gruver

Sr. Project Manager at Stradley Ronon

Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management

It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product helps us track activities, address complaints, and make improvements."

"With Airtable, we saw clear improvements in efficiency, especially in time and coordination."

"The solution makes it easy to structure data into simple data tables."

"The sorting of the data is the best feature of Airtable. In a Google sheet I have to insert some data and Airtable provides the default option of doing it automatically."

"Airtable does it all with Excel database functionality, spreadsheet capabilities, automation, and visually appealing interfaces, and data insights change in real-time, making it flexible and user-friendly."

"I am impressed with the tool's continuous improvement. Every six months we get to see a completely different product. You can build a new product using no-code applications. We are able to scale up with the product."

"I appreciated the ability to configure a graphical interface for a database, which was quite novel at the time."

"I am impressed with the product's user interface and integrations. It helps me to ship products very fast."

More Airtable pros

"LiquidPlanner is a great tool for Getting Things Done enthusiasts and project managers in general."

"The entire organisation is now on the same page, with one source of truth."

"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable, and we are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."

Cons

"What I would to see improved in Airtable is a chat feature. I really want to see a scenario where collaborators working on a project could easily chat, asking questions and discussing changes immediately on the project."

"However, for a smaller organization, Airtable would not be recommended because it is commercial and a bit expensive for a smaller organization that cannot bear it."

"Reporting, specifically anything involving exports, could be improved."

"I haven't used it in a while, so I cannot really provide specific areas that need improvement."

"The user interface should be more intuitive."

"The product's AI feature needs improvement."

"It'd be nice if the record limit of 50,000 record limit per base on pro accounts were substantially higher."

"The interfaces provided by the company have certainly undergone significant improvements since their earlier versions. The growth and progress have been remarkable. I have personally shared numerous feedback points and observed the prompt implementation of changes within a few months, which is highly commendable. However, I must admit that I have encountered several challenges with their interfaces."

More Airtable cons

"Perhaps my only comment is that it is not cheap but in saying that, it is worth every penny."

"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome."

"I'd like to see more power and triggers in the iOS app."

"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For basic usage, Airtable is an open-source tool but if you need premium features like script automation, then you need to pay for it. As my clients provide me access after buying the subscription I do not have much knowledge about pricing."

"Airtable's pricing depends on the plan that you're on."

"The product would be expensive for customers with only one application or database."

"The solution is not expensive."

"We are utilizing the free version of the software, which adequately meets most of our requirements. As we explore the higher-end versions, we have noticed that the primary distinctions lie in the number of records and usage limitations. However, the free version offers comprehensive functionality, and the disparity between the free and paid versions is minimal, with only a few minor differences."

"The product's price is good."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of users. The product's pricing is okay for personal use. For large organizations, pricing can be a pain. As per the first-rate plan, you need to pay 10 USD per user. The next plan would cost you 20 USD per user. If you are looking for enterprise-type plans, then you need to contact the sales team."

"The product is a little bit expensive."

More Airtable pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

16%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Media Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Construction Company

24%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Airtable?

Pricing, setup cost, and licensing were pretty much easier because Airtable is straightforward. The pricing can be priced for five years and renewal of every two and a half years or every one year ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Airtable?

There is definitely a scope of improvement for Airtable, particularly in understanding the menu bar, which seems very small but has multiple functionalities beneath it. If things could be segregate...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Airtable?

Airtable is used to manage and keep track of sprints, and anything that needs to be prioritized or any specific Jira change requests that need to be considered, as well as any kind of sprint planni...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ServiceNow vs Airtable

Compared 16% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs Airtable

Compared 16% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Airtable

Compared 8% of the time

Asana vs Airtable

Compared 7% of the time

Notion vs Airtable

Compared 5% of the time

More Airtable Competitors

Wrike vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 8% of the time

Ninety vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 8% of the time

CMW Platform vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 8% of the time

Planview ProjectPlace vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 6% of the time

More LiquidPlanner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Airtable

October 2026

Download Airtable product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

October 2026

Download LiquidPlanner product report

Overview

Airtable is recognized for its intuitive operation and robust automation, enhancing data management and collaboration efficiency. It supports a variety of business needs with its flexibility and integration capabilities.

Airtable empowers users with a platform that combines the familiarity of relational databases, data sorting, and custom formulas with the ability to streamline workflows through powerful automation. Its diverse field types, seamless integration with popular tools, and scripting extension significantly enhance data management and reporting processes. Additionally, automatic saving ensures efficient document storage and access, fostering collaboration from any location. Users appreciate the flexibility of its relational databases and grid-like views similar to spreadsheets. While there are sections for enhancement, Airtable remains a flexible tool for project tracking, CRM management, and various operational tasks.

What are the key features of Airtable?

Intuitive Interface: Provides a user-friendly experience while accessing and managing data.
Automation Capabilities: Streamlines repetitive workflows to save time and effort.
Relational Databases: Offers flexibility in managing complex data relationships.
Data Sorting and Custom Formulas: Enhances the ability to analyze and organize data.
Seamless Integration: Connects effortlessly with other tools for comprehensive solutions.
Rich Field Types: Supports diverse data inputs for versatile applications.

What benefits should users consider when reviewing Airtable?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team communication and project management from anywhere.
Workflow Efficiency: Automates tasks to improve productivity across business functions.
Flexible Customization: Adapts to specific business processes and needs.
Data Accessibility: Provides secure, easy access to stored information and documents.

In industries like project management, CRM, and database creation, Airtable helps businesses track projects, manage client databases, control inventory, and automate tasks. Organizations leverage its integrative capabilities with tools like Google Workspace and Pipedrive to monitor site visits, manage communications, and address ecommerce requirements, enhancing overall efficiency.

Airtable

LiquidPlanner offers a dynamic planning solution tailored for businesses that require precise forecasting and task prioritization. It's designed to enhance project visibility and improve time management through sophisticated algorithms.

The tool integrates predictive scheduling, allowing teams to plan with confidence by automatically adjusting tasks and deadlines based on real-time data. Supporting effective collaboration, LiquidPlanner helps eliminate bottlenecks and align team efforts towards shared objectives. The platform suits teams seeking optimized project timelines and data-driven insights.

What are the most valuable features of LiquidPlanner?

Predictive Scheduling: Automatically adjusts timelines based on real-time inputs.
Task Prioritization: Enables clear ranking of tasks to ensure resource focus.
Resource Management: Allocates resources efficiently to maximize output.
Time Tracking: Facilitates accurate monitoring of time spent on projects.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances team communication and data sharing.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Time Efficiency: Streamlined processes reduce project duration.
Improved Forecasting: Accurate predictions help in achieving deadlines.
Enhanced Productivity: Prioritization aids in focusing efforts where needed most.
Cost Savings: Optimal resource use contributes to budget management.

LiquidPlanner is implemented across industries such as IT, consulting, and engineering where project complexity demands adaptable planning tools. Its predictive capabilities make it a suitable choice for environments needing flexibility and precise adjustments to timeframes and resources.

LiquidPlanner

Sample Customers

Cole Haan, Expedia, BuzzFeed, Medium, Shopify, Box, JetBlue

Amazon, Redapt, Toshiba, LinkedIn, Nintendo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cummins

Buyer's Guide

Airtable vs. LiquidPlanner

September 2026

Free Report: Airtable vs. LiquidPlanner

Find out what your peers are saying about Airtable vs. LiquidPlanner and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Airtable vs. LiquidPlanner report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.