Affinity vs Bullhorn comparison

Affinity and Bullhorn are both solutions in the CRM category. Affinity is ranked #40, while Bullhorn is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.5. Affinity holds a 0.7% mindshare in CRM, compared to Bullhorn’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Affinity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Bullhorn users who would recommend it.

Affinity

Read 3 Affinity reviews

2,327 Views
2,327 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bullhorn

Read 2 Bullhorn reviews

2,070 Views
1,573 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Affinity

Bullhorn

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Affinity and Bullhorn based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two CRM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Affinity vs. Bullhorn Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Affinity vs. Bullhorn

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Affinity

Ranking in CRM

40th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Bullhorn

Ranking in CRM

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Affinity is 0.7%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bullhorn is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

CRM Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Bullhorn	0.6%
Affinity	0.7%
Other	98.7%

CRM

Featured Reviews

Marcus Quinn

Chief Information Officer at Business Growth & Software Development Consultancy

Open source, stable and capable of working with existing Adobe files

Affinity Photo needs to work more. They need to align as much as possible with the shortcuts and keystrokes of Adobe. It's just because when you learn a tool as a professional, you tend to learn all the shortcuts and keystrokes. And if they're not the same as the same type of products that you migrated from, you lose productivity because you forget how to do things. You don't know where things are on the menu. You don't know the icon for it because you just know it as, "Oh, if I press this key, I get that." You forget the user interface. You just remember the keystrokes and the shortcuts. So, if that could align as much as possible with what I'm used to from Adobe, that would be good. And there's another product I use called Pixelmator Pro. And as much as I wish Affinity Photos did everything that Photoshop did, I actually ended up using this other product, Pixelmator, more for image editing because I just find it faster and more in line with what I remember from Photoshop. So, they are good. They've designed a good product. It's just the shortcuts and keystrokes need to match what people are used to, especially coming from Adobe because, let's say, it didn't exist. Affinity is a newer product.

Read full review

Christiane Hauk

COO at RM Group (Switzerland)

Have improved workflows through automation but faced challenges with feature limitations and unclear pricing

The impact of those automation features on our operational efficiency is huge; however, what I don't appreciate about it is that it's very limited; it's limited to Bullhorn and, even within Bullhorn, it's limited to the candidate, the placement, the job, and the contact entity. You cannot automate files, notes, or change requests, so it's very limited, and they also don't do any further development in this anymore since AI is on the market. When it comes to automation in Bullhorn, I would appreciate seeing that automation is possible for integrating files. For example, that you can say, show me all candidates who don't have a file or which have a file that is older than one year, or which have a file type of resume or contract. I would appreciate seeing the possibility to build automations based on change requests, where you can automate according to the status submitted or approved, which is currently not possible, or automation based on notes. When it comes to the missing features in Bullhorn, I have numerous suggestions. Recently they introduced the AI assistant, which is a chatbot within Bullhorn that can refer to candidate, contact, and job data, which is great. However, the output from your prompt can only be copied to a clipboard and not inserted into a Bullhorn field, meaning you always have to do three, four more clicks to get it over to an email or to the field that publishes the job ad. This functionality has to be developed further because there are other tools that can already do this. The prompting and formatting possibilities within the prompt are very limited as well. Regarding AI, there is no match top candidates functionality that provides results good enough to use. We are already using the Textkernel search, which is the future search Bullhorn will integrate. Additionally, we also work with Bullhorn Onboarding, which is a catastrophe; it's not further developed, and they have not provided a new solution for the German-speaking market in five years. We also use the Canvas reporting tool that lacks further development; there are limitations on what you can build reports on. I would appreciate seeing improvements there, and to close this circle, I would appreciate seeing a kind of avatar that can conduct a first interview with a candidate.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that it's completely automated. It's a very robust system. You are not going to have faults in it."

"We are using Affinity as a very robust contact list."

"The most valuable features of Affinity are the connection features it provides because you have a large database of startups. The people who worked in the companies and founded them are displayed in Affinity. It can show if they are using some special intelligence feature and that you may know this person, of your connections. For example, if they know the person. It works similar to the way LinkedIn does when you seek a connection. Additionally, Affinity shows how close this person is and how often they contact each other."

"For me, the most valuable feature is the fact that they work with existing Adobe files. And open and edit PDFs and web-optimized exports. It's been very good."

"The most valuable features of Affinity are the connection features it provides because you have a large database of startups."

"What I appreciate best about Bullhorn is its user interface, which is really nice, and I enjoy the flexibility that you have with it and how you can customize it to meet your needs."

"What I appreciate most about Bullhorn's core functionalities and ATS functionalities is that it is highly customizable, the UI is very user friendly, and it's very easy to train."

Cons

"To get people to migrate, Affinity needs to somehow give them an incentive to change. The key is to make it as similar as possible. Shortcuts and keystrokes would be my biggest learning curve. So, to scale, you're going to have to convince people to relearn their workflow, and everybody's too busy to do that. Scalability is kind of mid because you face adoption resistance if you're pushing out to a studio or staff that are used to Adobe. Many products don't think beyond Microsoft and Adobe. If it's not Microsoft, then they don't understand. So, scalability is a challenge."

"Affinity could improve by adding more features. It has been a while since I have used it, but when I did, the features could improve."

"It would be better if it were pay-per-user instead of pay-per-account."

"It would be better if it were "pay-per-user" instead of "pay-per-account." For example, I'm Siddharth Mallya, and I have two email accounts. Each of those accounts is a separate payable account for me. For instance, I have created a network using my personal email ID, and now I have moved to my company email ID. It'll choose any one of those accounts, and that will become my paid account. For example, if I put in my personal email ID, then that's the account that I pay for. But I'm no longer using it, and it's not going to get updated. If I put in my work email ID, then that's an entirely separate account that I have to pay for."

"I think one thing that could be improved is that it's expensive."

"Bullhorn Onboarding, which is a catastrophe; it's not further developed, and they have not provided a new solution for the German-speaking market in five years."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Affinity is an expensive solution. However, they over a free version trial. The solution is expensive but the people that have used it say it is worth the money."

"Affinity follows a pay-per-account model, and I think there will be a monthly or a yearly paid subscription. I have heard that it was expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

23%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bullhorn?

Bullhorn is expensive, and if you are looking to scale your operations, it really shines.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bullhorn?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bullhorn?

We are an agency, a staffing agency, and we use Bullhorn mainly as an ATS, so we use it for reporting, onboarding, and to process our payrolling requests.

See all answers

Comparisons

Attio vs Affinity

Compared 19% of the time

HubSpot Sales Hub vs Affinity

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs Affinity

Compared 15% of the time

monday.com vs Affinity

Compared 10% of the time

HubSpot CRM vs Affinity

Compared 6% of the time

More Affinity Competitors

Pipeliner CRM vs Bullhorn

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs Bullhorn

Compared 16% of the time

Crelate Recruit vs Bullhorn

Compared 15% of the time

Crelate vs Bullhorn

Compared 15% of the time

Greenhouse vs Bullhorn

Compared 6% of the time

More Bullhorn Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Affinity

August 2026

Download Affinity product report

Buyer's Guide

CRM

August 2026

Download Bullhorn product report

Overview

Affinity empowers businesses with intelligent relationship management, using AI to transform data into actionable insights for decision-making. It's ideal for industries requiring sophisticated network management and data integration.

Affinity is designed to streamline relationship management with cutting-edge AI and ML capabilities. It provides users a comprehensive view of their networks, centralizing data and offering insights into professional connections. With its ability to foster relationship-driven growth, Affinity helps businesses enhance their approach to networking and data-driven strategies. Its rich analytics tools allow for an intuitive understanding of complex relationships, making it essential for professionals who rely on data-driven decision-making.

What key features make Affinity stand out?

AI-Powered Insights: Leverages AI to provide actionable insights and relationship intelligence.
Relationship Intelligence: Centralizes contact information to analyze and visualize networks.
Pipeline Management: Streamlines project management with AI-driven suggestions to improve efficiency.
CRM Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing CRM systems to ensure consistent data flow.

What benefits and ROI should you expect?

Increased Efficiency: Saves time on manual data entry, allowing focus on strategic tasks.
Improved Decision-Making: Offers data-driven insights for informed decisions.
Enhanced Networking: Strengthens professional connections and identifies new opportunities.
Cost-Effective Relationship Management: Reduces costs related to maintaining disparate information systems.

In VC and private equity, Affinity is crucial for uncovering hidden connections and driving strategic investments. Real estate professionals benefit from improved client management, while consulting firms utilize the AI insights to gain competitive advantage. These industry-specific applications showcase Affinity's adaptability and effectiveness in fostering growth and innovation.

Affinity

Bullhorn is a comprehensive platform tailored for staffing and recruiting professionals, offering tools to streamline operations and enhance productivity. Its features integrate seamlessly into workflows to optimize candidate management and placement processes.

Designed with the needs of recruiters in mind, Bullhorn provides an advanced suite of tools including automated data capture, robust reporting capabilities, and seamless integrations with third-party apps. These functionalities support efficient management of candidate relationships and improve overall operational efficiency. Bullhorn's cloud-based system ensures accessibility and real-time collaboration across teams, while its user-friendly interface allows easy navigation through tasks and processes. As a trusted platform in the recruiting industry, Bullhorn continues to innovate, supporting businesses in finding and managing talent effectively.

What are the key features of Bullhorn?

Automated Data Capture: Streamlines information entry and reduces manual errors by automatically capturing data from emails and resumes.
Reporting and Analytics: Provides insights into recruitment performance through customizable reports and dashboards.
CRM Integration: Enhances client and candidate relationship management with seamless integration options.
Mobile Access: Allows recruiters to work on-the-go with a fully functional mobile app.

What benefits or ROI should users expect from Bullhorn?

Increased Productivity: Automation and streamlined processes reduce time spent on administrative tasks, allowing more focus on candidate interaction.
Improved Collaboration: Real-time access and cloud-based features enable better teamwork and communication across locations.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Data-driven insights from robust analytics help refine recruiting strategies.
Scalable Solutions: The system grows with the business, adapting to changing needs without disruption.

In industries such as healthcare, finance, and IT, Bullhorn is implemented as an end-to-end staffing solution, enabling recruiters to efficiently manage high-volume placements and specialized talent sourcing. By tailoring features to suit diverse sector demands, Bullhorn helps businesses achieve their hiring goals efficiently.

Bullhorn

Sample Customers

T3 Advisors, Cushman & Wakefield,

Tiro Partners, Skills Alliance, Think IT Recruitment, Mclaren Consultancy, REACH Employment Services, Aurec, FocusCore, Icon Partners, Curate Partners, Rowben Consulting, Richard Lloyd, Peoplefusion, Gemini People, Glotel

Buyer's Guide

Affinity vs. Bullhorn

August 2026

Free Report: Affinity vs. Bullhorn

Find out what your peers are saying about Affinity vs. Bullhorn and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Affinity vs. Bullhorn report.

See our list of best CRM vendors.

We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.