Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adobe Web Experience Management vs DIGITAL CX comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Web Experience Manage...
Ranking in Customer Experience Management
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
DIGITAL CX
Ranking in Customer Experience Management
17th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Customer Communications Management (CCM) (3rd), Social CRM (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Customer Experience Management category, the mindshare of Adobe Web Experience Management is 2.1%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DIGITAL CX is 0.8%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Experience Management
 

Featured Reviews

Syed Hasan - PeerSpot reviewer
It has a lot of features, and it is very easy to learn, use, integrate, and manage
It would be better if it also supports some styling. Currently, whenever we have to do design for a particular client according to their brand strategy, it takes a good amount of effort. Adobe never focuses on this area. They say that you design your pages, templates, etc. If they can define common components or a common section of the style sheet so that if you want to have a button by default, you can go and just mention the specifications, such as the color code, and those specifications are automatically followed across the whole site or multiple sites according to the brand strategy. Such functionality will be helpful because currently, it takes a lot of effort to manage them separately. They can increase the number of components in terms of combinations. For example, if I take an image and a text component, currently, Adobe gives you just an image and text component. It should provide multiple versions, such as image, text, and video. That's because, on most of the sites, clients always come up with this combination. They want to have a video. They want to have an image, and they want to have some text. There could be options to have any of the following combinations: * The image on the left, the video on the right, and the text at the bottom. * The image on the left, the video on the right, and the text at the top. * The image in the center, the video on top, and the text at the bottom. If they can come up with such permutations and combinations, it will make the work easier. It will help us in putting out the site in a faster way, instead of us having to do the regular development every time. They can come up with some out-of-the-box components to help you drag and drop a video that will be displayed in a particular player. Currently, some of the features are not available, and we have to customize them. They can look into the top video players that are being used by most of the end-users from a location and provide out-of-the-box components. They can look into the features of YouTube, Vimeo, and other top players.
reviewer1295121 - PeerSpot reviewer
Advanced VoIP functions that scales well and integrates AI
I am primarily working with Zoom products, including Zoom Video, Zoom Phone, Zoom Rooms, Zoom Webinar, and Zoom Contact Center. I also have experience with RingCentral, where I have helped customers with their phone system and resolving configuration issues RingCentral has a good implementation…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The templates and components that come out of the box are very helpful, especially in terms of the content fragments and experience fragments. Every client would like to have some templates and components, and they would like to cut down the effort of having to create every component that's customized. So, they try to use them out of the box. Other than that, the user roles and permissions workflows, third-party integrations, and system integration are the features that are very important."
"Good content and digital management capabilities."
"RingCentral has a good implementation of voice over IP and is easy to use, enabling a range of VoIP functions."
 

Cons

"It would be better if it also supports some styling. Currently, whenever we have to do design for a particular client according to their brand strategy, it takes a good amount of effort. Adobe never focuses on this area. They say that you design your pages, templates, etc. If they can define common components or a common section of the style sheet so that if you want to have a button by default, you can go and just mention the specifications, such as the color code, and those specifications are automatically followed across the whole site or multiple sites according to the brand strategy. Such functionality will be helpful because currently, it takes a lot of effort to manage them separately."
"Unable to handle very large video files."
"RingCentral could improve by incorporating more advanced AI functionalities, as Zoom currently has AI integrated across their products."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's definitely an expensive solution, but it comes with a lot of features and scalability. As compared to other content management systems that we have in the market, AEM is the costliest one. There is no hidden or additional fee."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Experience Management solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DIGITAL CX?
Pricing on RingCentral can be confusing due to numerous surcharges and fees, making it important to consider all fees for a true comparison with other services. Zoom, however, is more competitive a...
What needs improvement with DIGITAL CX?
RingCentral could improve by incorporating more advanced AI functionalities, as Zoom currently has AI integrated across their products.
What is your primary use case for DIGITAL CX?
I am primarily working with Zoom products, including Zoom Video, Zoom Phone, Zoom Rooms, Zoom Webinar, and Zoom Contact Center. I also have experience with RingCentral, where I have helped customer...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Dimelo, a Ring Central Company
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg, University of Georgia, The University of Auckland, Dalhousie University, KfW Bankengruppe, IG Group, National Australia Bank, Investec, New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT), Swiss Federal Railways (SBB), Singapore Tourism Board, European Southern Observatory (ESO)
Orange, SCNF, AXA, Total, Cdiscount, DB, PMU, Ooredoo, Telenor, BNP...
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Qualtrics, Salesforce and others in Customer Experience Management. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.