

Acunetix and CloudBees are prominent in the security and CI/CD automation spaces respectively. While Acunetix offers deep security insights, CloudBees outpaces it in scalability and integration efficiency.
Features: Acunetix offers robust testing capabilities with features like Interactive Application Security Testing, a Login Sequence Recorder, and comprehensive vulnerability scanning. CloudBees excels in scalability with advanced integration options that cater to large teams. Its pipeline management and automation features are extensive, providing seamless deployment processes.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix users seek improvements in reducing false positives, enhancing the IAS tool, and offering more flexible licensing. CloudBees users wish for better management of plugin updates, improved performance speed, and a more intuitive user interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix provides various deployment options like on-premises and hybrid cloud and receives mixed reviews for its support responsiveness. Meanwhile, CloudBees offers robust deployment options across public and private clouds backed by responsive support primarily through a ticketing system.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix's price increases have led users to reassess its value. Despite this, it provides a positive return on investment by enhancing security outcomes. CloudBees, though considered expensive, is justified in cost by its valuable CI/CD capabilities and integration benefits.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
I have seen a return on investment with Acunetix, including time saved and cost reduction, because it provides us threats on our web application servers.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
Acunetix's scalability for my growing needs is great; it is a very scalable product compared to others.
I did not need to reach customer support because the product is very stable.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| CloudBees | 2.7% |
| Acunetix | 7.4% |
| Other | 89.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
CloudBees provides a highly scalable and secure platform that supports seamless integration and automation across multiple environments. It excels in managing Jenkins instances and offers flexible deployment options, enhancing efficiency for large teams.
CloudBees is recognized for its integration with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible, allowing companies to leverage its robust automation capabilities for continuous integration and deployment. With its strong support for Docker and Kubernetes, teams benefit from streamlined code management and operational efficiency. Its scalable architecture, real-time feedback, and premium vendor support help manage large-scale applications and microservices. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with pipeline setup, service availability, and GUI accessibility, which suggest room for improvement in these areas.
What are the key features of CloudBees?
What benefits should users expect in reviews?
In tech and software industries, companies implement CloudBees for managing complex CI/CD pipelines. Its integration with DevOps tools facilitates automation and workflow optimization. Industries with large teams managing thousands of microservices use CloudBees to maintain high availability, streamline processes, and ensure security compliance, driving efficient production workflows.
We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.