Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Commvault Active Copy Management [EOL] vs Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Commvault Active Copy Manag...
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Google Cloud Backup and DR ...
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Copy Data Management (5th)
 

Featured Reviews

Enrico Boseli - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful disaster recovery, effective copy replication, but complex deployment
The primary use of the solution is for backup and disaster recovery for medium to large size companies.  The solution's most valuable features are copy replication, instant recovery, and disaster recovery. The solution could be adapted to fit other use cases for smaller companies.…
reviewer1446237 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to set up and can integrate with cyber recovery solutions but is only for Google Cloud
The initial setup is straightforward. I'd rate the experience eight out of ten. Time-wise, maybe within a couple of hours, everything should be up and running. You need to have good planning to have network communication between your VPCs where your workloads reside and where your backup appliance resides. Good planning is required connectivity-wise. In terms of authentication, you need to plan what level of authentication is required for what level of users. These are the two main things that need to be taken care of at the outset. From the integrator side, one guy should be enough to deploy the product. Once it is operational and handed over, it's up to the customer to handle the product, to maintain the product.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I find most valuable about this solution is that it is robust!"
"The product's technical support is very good."
"The solution's most valuable features are copy replication, instant recovery, and disaster recovery."
"Immediate recovery and data virtualization."
"Technical support is good."
 

Cons

"I would like to see a scaled down version to cater to SME needs, where the licensing model is exchanged for a pay per use model."
"The solution could be adapted to fit other use cases for smaller companies."
"The solution should be offered at a better price."
"Backup to tapes is not supported."
"As of now, it's predominantly meant for Google Cloud. It would be good if it could be extended to other clouds as well."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very effective for the money you spend. They need to have better competent IT department assistants in order to get the best out of the solution."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Copy Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expert International GmbH
Admirals Bank, Euronet Worldwide, Emerald Queen Casino, Rezolve Group Inc., Logi-Tech, Service Credit Union NH
Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, IBM, Hitachi Vantara and others in Copy Data Management. Updated: August 2025.
867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.