A10 Thunder TPS vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection comparison

A10 Networks and Nexusguard are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. A10 Networks is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.0, while Nexusguard is ranked #24. A10 Networks holds a 1.5% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Nexusguard’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of A10 Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nexusguard users who would recommend it.

A10 Thunder TPS

Read 15 A10 Thunder TPS reviews

1,993 Views
1,993 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Read 5 Nexusguard DDoS Protection reviews

1,507 Views
1,507 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

A10 Thunder TPS

Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

A10 Thunder TPS and Nexusguard DDoS Protection are competing products in the DDoS mitigation category. While A10 Thunder TPS excels in ease of deployment and customer support, Nexusguard is favored for its advanced features, appealing to those in need of a comprehensive solution despite potential higher costs.

Features: A10 Thunder TPS integrates robustly with existing systems and provides advanced threat intelligence, focusing on high-capacity traffic management with rapid attack mitigation. In contrast, Nexusguard leverages a global threat detection network and emphasizes ease of scalability with cloud-based protection, ensuring seamless and flexible solutions. Nexusguard's adaptable cloud infrastructure distinguishes it from A10’s hardware-based offerings.

Room for Improvement: A10 Thunder TPS could enhance its cloud capabilities for users preferring non-hardware solutions. More intuitive user interfaces and automation features can streamline its deployment process. Additionally, expanding integration with third-party tools might enhance its flexibility. Nexusguard could work on reducing initial setup costs and improving transparency around service performance metrics. Enhancing customizability for diverse threat environments and increasing on-premise options might attract a broader user base.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nexusguard offers straightforward cloud-based deployment, which allows for rapid implementation and easy scalability, backed by strong customer service. A10 Thunder TPS, though comprehensive, often involves intricate on-premise installations that require more technical management. However, A10 is recognized for its responsive customer support and technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: A10 Thunder TPS provides a competitive pricing model with significant long-term ROI due to its hardware investment and lower ongoing costs. Nexusguard, with potentially higher initial expenses for its cloud-based solutions, offers long-term ROI rooted in service flexibility and reduced need for hardware updates. This creates a notable difference where A10 is more cost-effective for organizations leaning towards hardware investments, whereas Nexusguard's upfront cost is counterbalanced by its scalable and adaptable service model.

To learn more, read our detailed A10 Thunder TPS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

A10 Thunder TPS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

A10 Thunder TPS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

24th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of A10 Thunder TPS is 1.5%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nexusguard DDoS Protection is 2.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
A10 Thunder TPS	1.5%
Nexusguard DDoS Protection	2.1%
Other	96.4%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

reviewer1126782

Information Technology Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Management console adds value and technical support delivers timely solutions

I had issues with the user interface because, when putting settings up, the system asked me for strange things like virtual local networks that I didn't create. For example, I set an NTP server, and after some clicks, a message appeared stating 'setup is incorrect'. It asked for a VLAN even though no VLANs were created. We had to find workarounds for issues like A10 blocking necessary traffic, sometimes leading to decreased security, because it was the simplest way to deal with them. This was a real issue. A more flexible policy for demo licenses would also be helpful.

Read full review

ShashikaKodikara

Head of Cybersecurity at Technovage Solution

A solution requiring straightforward maintenance while remaining cost-effective compared to its competitors in the market

I am not in a position to speak about the areas where the solution needed improvement because I resigned during the implementation phase. At that time, the implementation was ongoing, and everything seemed to be going well. Using the solution, our team managed to transfer a couple of routers through a few areas. However, I believe the migration is still ongoing. Nonetheless, the first phase of the implementation was successful before my departure. There was a certain level of performance degradation in the solution, which I don't know if it can be tuned. This is because I was working for a short period on the solution. In my experience, it is an area that can be improved while also considering the stability and scalability aspects of the solution. If one wants to scale up, then one needs to change their plan. However, the thing is, one can always go for the larger scale based on one's anticipation of future traffic.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The GUI is very use-friendly, you can configure it through CLI or GUI so they give you an option to choose, and it's a good solution in terms of the appliance itself because it's very light compared to other brands that offer DDoS solutions."

"Based on previous equipment that we had, it's amazing that this device can do what it can do in a 1U form factor. The devices that we have right now have never gone over capacity and we've actually mitigated some pretty large attacks."

"Thunder TPS has automated mitigation and fully managed support in case the device cannot handle the attack. They have engineers available to respond."

"The primary benefit that we see from their systems is that their filtering technology has the ability to detect and drop the malicious traffic from the legitimate traffic with a high success rate. That, in combination with the very small effort needed to manage their systems, are the two most important benefits to us."

"It is a scalable solution."

"I had a rather positive experience with A10 Networks Support Service."

"The most valuable feature of A10 Thunder TPS is load balancing."

"The solution has reduced the amount of manual intervention required during an attack. We have the inline solution and when it comes to the customers that we have on it, it has saved us some troubleshooting time."

More A10 Thunder TPS pros

"The managed service allows us to confidently rely on Nexusguard’s professional team to take relevant actions as and when required to make sure DDoS attacks are successfully mitigated, ensuring 100% uptime of our service."

"Based on the support received for implementation, I rate the solution's technical support a nine out of ten."

"Nexusguard has exponentially improved the availability of our services because we don't have to worry much about any threats or DDoS attacks towards our services."

"Nexusguard has given us confidence that we are protected against any outside attacks."

"The support team was helpful."

"Filters can be customized depending on the characteristics of the attack traffic. This feature has made it easier for Nexusguard's SOC team to further isolate any specific attack that can't be blocked by pre-configured mitigation."

"Cloud Diversion is another good feature packaged with the whole solution. When attack traffic is detected, Cloud Diversion triggers to automatically route our prefix to Nexusguard’s scrubbing center, ensuring that all attack traffic is dropped in the shortest time possible."

Cons

"Its documentation could be better."

"They have a cloud scrubbing feature that redirects the traffic if the on-prem appliance can't accommodate a large amount of traffic but it's not available where we are."

"If there's one aspect of A10 that needs improvement it would be the training."

"We currently do not use the solution's machine-learning-powered Zero-day Automated Protection because of an issue with it... We also use the aGalaxy platform, which is a management platform for the TPS devices. The issue is that some TPS features were added at the TPS level but weren't carried over to aGalaxy, and we manage all of our devices through aGalaxy. So we can't actually use some of the new features that are available on the TPS because that functionality doesn't exist in aGalaxy. That is one of my biggest complaints."

"I had issues with the user interface because, when putting settings up, the system asked me for strange things like virtual local networks that I didn't create."

"I would like for them to develop an advanced reporting feature."

"The solution is a little expensive."

"The upgrade process for the boxes is not efficient. We have to go through the A10 aGalaxy where we have issues, like timeouts. They told me it was fixed in the latest version, but I tried to do it on the Portal and it is not working all the time."

More A10 Thunder TPS cons

"The mitigation scope of Origin Protection is not fully efficient as there could be delays in activating the countermeasures."

"One of the features that should be added to the next release is report generation. Currently, reports can be downloaded every month and are only available at the beginning of each month. It would be nice to generate the reports based on specific dates that we prefer and not have to wait until the next month for the current month’s report."

"The solution must provide features for the post-processing of the traffic type and the traffic quality."

"One of the features that should be added to the next release is report generation."

"There was a certain level of performance degradation in the solution, which I don't know if it can be tuned...In my experience, it is an area that can be improved while also considering the stability and scalability aspects of the solution."

"One thing that we would like to improve from them is to provide more training to SOC team for them to have a deep understanding of the solution so that they would always be ready to answer anything without the need to escalate queries to senior personnel."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is very reasonable."

"We did a price survey, and compared to other solutions, A10 Thunder TPS wasn't cheap."

"The tool is expensive. If one is low price and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as a ten."

"We may need to pay fifty percent more if we purchase other solutions. For the payments made to A10 Thunder TPS, we have received three-year support."

"Pricing was much higher with Arbor (APS) for the same type of solution."

"The financials are always a challenge with this type of technology. That's not really a product-functionality thing but it's the area where we push A10 the most."

"We had a customer who was down for six hours and the loss of revenue for him was three times the price he was paying for us per year. The customer just said, "I don't care about paying you because on only one attack I saved money. It's three times better than losing money.""

"On a scale of one to ten, where one represents a cheap option, and ten represents an expensive option, I would rate the solution a seven in terms of cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

32%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

44%

Media Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for A10 Thunder TPS?

I have not seen specific prices, like $10,000 or $20,000. A frustrating aspect is the lack of demo versions. The vendor insists on commercial licenses despite requests for demo licenses. The global...

See all answers

What needs improvement with A10 Thunder TPS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for A10 Thunder TPS?

Currently, I have a test setup. A10 Thunder TPS ( /products/a10-thunder-tps-reviews ) works in a chain with a Check Point firewall and a Juniper MX router. Recently, we had a presentation from a ve...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Arbor DDoS vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 26% of the time

Radware DDoS vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 15% of the time

Cloudflare vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Shield vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 9% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 8% of the time

More A10 Thunder TPS Competitors

F5 Silverline Managed Services vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudflare vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Arbor DDoS vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Kaspersky DDoS Protection vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Radware DDoS vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Compared 7% of the time

More Nexusguard DDoS Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

A10 Thunder TPS

August 2026

Download A10 Thunder TPS product report

Buyer's Guide

Nexusguard DDoS Protection

August 2026

Download Nexusguard DDoS Protection product report

Overview

A10 Thunder TPS provides advanced DDoS mitigation with seamless traffic management, ensuring legitimate network activity while blocking threats efficiently. It operates with minimal oversight, featuring quick response capabilities and operational simplicity.

A10 Thunder TPS is engineered for rapid detection and defense against DDoS threats, employing programmable automated solutions through RESTful API integrations and aGalaxy management. This system efficiently handles extensive attacks with multi-vector protection, supporting functions such as load balancing. Its intuitive interface allows quick adaptation, helping organizations minimize operational expenses and quickly counter threats. Challenges arise in aligning TPS features with aGalaxy, necessitating improvements in reporting and user training methods. Integration issues due to import restrictions further complicate deployment endeavors.

What are the key features of A10 Thunder TPS?

Advanced Filtering: Detects and removes malicious traffic while maintaining legitimate data flow.
Fast DDoS Mitigation: Quickly resolves attacks with automated programmable defenses.
Multi-Vector Protection: Shields against diverse attack methods efficiently.
Load Balancing Support: Ensures optimal distribution of network traffic.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies complex defense tasks to enhance response time.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Operational Efficiency: Lowers management effort with automated solutions.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces operational costs through streamlined resource use.
User Satisfaction: Interfaces that cater to quick and intuitive interaction support.
Adaptability: Works in various attack scenarios offering dependable network defense.

A10 Thunder TPS serves as a robust defense for cloud infrastructure and hosting companies against powerful DDoS threats. By rerouting harmful traffic and ensuring legitimate traffic reaches its destination, this protection system is employed on-premises alongside other tools for substantial availability. Its capabilities in load balancing and network troubleshooting further reinforce its role in maintaining security and reliability against high-capacity attacks across industries.

A10 Networks

Nexusguard DDoS Protection provides comprehensive Origin Protection, customizable filters, and cloud-based attack traffic routing to ensure 100% uptime without additional hardware or staff.

Nexusguard DDoS Protection is designed to shield networks and critical infrastructure from cyber-attacks, including DDoS incidents. It offers Origin Protection and customizable filters covering site, network, and host levels. With automatic traffic routing through Cloud Diversion, businesses enjoy managed services ensuring consistent uptime. Nexusguard's local scrubbing capacity reaches up to 100 GB, and transparent traffic analysis is facilitated through intuitive dashboards. Users have access to 24/7 support via the Help Center, ensuring efficient DDoS mitigation and minimized downtime without requiring extra hardware or staff. Areas for improvement include report generation and post-processing features, while application security within Origin Protection might benefit from enhanced application layer analysis.

What are Nexusguard DDoS Protection's key features?

Origin Protection: Safeguards against all attack types with customizable filters.
Cloud Diversion: Automatically reroutes attack traffic to scrubbing centers.
Local Scrubbing: Supports up to 100 GB to handle larger threats.
Intuitive Dashboards: Facilitates transparent traffic analysis.
24/7 Support: Assistance via Help Center for uninterrupted operations.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

100% Uptime: Maintains consistent service availability.
Network Efficiency: Reduces downtime without additional hardware or staff.
Scalability: Accommodates growing demands with robust protection.
Compliance Assurance: Keeps businesses aligned with security standards.

Industries like online gaming and cargo management utilize Nexusguard DDoS Protection to maintain service availability and meet uptime requirements. By effectively managing network traffic and overcoming ISP-related challenges, companies can ensure seamless operations and continuity. Nexusguard’s customizable, enterprise-grade services support proactive security measures, enabling businesses to remain resilient against cyber threats.

Nexusguard

Sample Customers

DDoS defense solution trusted for more than 200 service providers, online gaming, and enterprises including; Bungie, Comcast, KDDI Corporation, Leaseweb, Microsoft Azure, NTT Docomo, Softbank, Turkcell Superonline, Verizon and more.

21st Century Technologies, Netpluz, REDtone, SNOC, StarHub, aamra

Buyer's Guide

A10 Thunder TPS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection

August 2026

Free Report: A10 Thunder TPS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about A10 Thunder TPS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our A10 Thunder TPS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.