3scale API Management and Postman compete in the API management and testing space. Based on the comparison, 3scale shows strengths in deployment and integration, while Postman has an advantage in user-friendliness and automation capabilities.
Features: 3scale API Management is recognized for its gateway functions, ease of deployment on OpenShift, and integration capabilities. Postman excels in data-driven testing, automation, and its intuitive user interface, which simplifies API testing and development processes.
Room for Improvement: 3scale needs improvements in API management features, customization options, and SOAP API support, and its use of Liquid templates can be challenging. Postman requires enhancements in SOAP API support, data-driven testing, and better integration with tools like Jenkins, as well as more flexible collection management capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: 3scale API Management is lauded for its deployment flexibility and technical support for Red Hat partners, although documentation could be improved. Postman's deployment is straightforward, with generally positive customer support, though advanced support can sometimes be challenging.
Pricing and ROI: 3scale API Management is viewed as reasonably priced with an appealing cost-benefit ratio, especially when used with OpenShift. Postman offers a free version, making it cost-effective for individuals and small teams, though enterprise users find advanced features can be expensive. Both solutions are valued for their ROI, with 3scale noted for lower licensing costs and Postman for offering an open-source option.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
The tool is generally stable.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
If they can enhance it to have a database kind of validation like we have in ReadyAPI, it would be better.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
It has helped significantly since it is easy; the development team and QA team all use it, enabling us to automate almost 70% of our APIs using Postman.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
It is easy to install, as well as to learn, particularly for new users, even if they are not developers.
3scale is an API management platform that delivers flexible, highly scalable solutions to package, distribute, control, and monetize your APIs, giving you the power to make the most of your API program.
3scale delivers centralized API management features through a distributed, cloud-hosted layer. The platform includes built-in features to help you build a more successful API program, including access control, rate limits, payment gateway integration, and developer experience tools.
Postman's Tools Support Every Stage of the API Lifecycle. Through design, testing and full production, Postman is there for faster, easier API development - without the chaos.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
