No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

11:11 Cloud Backup vs Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

11:11 Cloud Backup
Ranking in Cloud Backup
44th
Average Rating
6.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Ba...
Ranking in Cloud Backup
11th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
SaaS Backup (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of 11:11 Cloud Backup is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup0.8%
11:11 Cloud Backup0.8%
Other98.4%
Cloud Backup
 

Featured Reviews

BL
Network Administrator at BROCKPORT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Good deduplication, easy to scale, and has good support
iland Secure Cloud Backup is very scalable. If you ask them for more space, they provide you with the pricing, and they make the adjustments on their end. We just recently went from 10 TB to 15 TB and they also do a great job of deduplication, because we were only using 10 TB, even though our SAN is 20TB, we were using 11 TB of it and we have some physical servers that were we are backing up.
Esther Sultaana - PeerSpot reviewer
Storage Consultant Storage at Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Ransomware attacks have been contained and healthcare data remains accessible 24x7
When I used Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup, I liked it. I really did. I cannot think of anything off the top of my head that says this needs to be improved. If we are going to compete with Commvault or Cohesity, some improvements could be made. However, overall, for what we used it for within the healthcare industry, I think it is fine, especially with the ransomware resilience. You have the isolated recovery environment and zero trust backup architecture. These things really are critical for industries in healthcare. Everything that I mentioned, Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is for SaaS, so it covers all the bases. It is easily installed within five minutes or so. The cost is simple—you do not have any servers, storage, infrastructure, or maintenance, and it is strictly being used for what it is. Its compliance is competitive. Overall, I would say the cost is simple, you have Entra ID backups, deployment is quick, there is no infrastructure, ransomware protection is there, granular restore, and you have Azure region storage control. Where there is a problem is it does not have enterprise-level backup or multi-cloud workloads. It is best used for small and maybe mid-sized businesses, and I would say within healthcare in particular. It is for cloud-first companies, and only if you have M365 protection for MSPs, which is what NTT Data was. It works within that framework. However, for large enterprises, you do not want to look at it. I would recommend Rubrik or Commvault instead.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The service itself wasn't bad."
"Their technical support is very good; I have contacted them a couple of times and I have never had a bad experience with them, and they are one of the better companies as far as their support."
"They have just implemented a Backup and Restore portal that we think is very good."
"We have not identified any issues with this solution and we are very happy with it."
"iland is excellent as far as the interface."
"The product enables us to restore lost files."
"Overall, I am a very satisfied user of Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup."
"Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup really helped considerably with getting healthcare storage and backups back up quickly."
"Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup has positively impacted my organization by helping us with disaster recovery planning and providing redundancy."
"Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup has been a reliable and valuable solution for our organization."
"The most valuable feature is the AI with threat detection that can detect ransomware and restore it."
"Overall, I would rate Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup a nine out of ten."
"I appreciate that Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup saves everything for us, and it's secure and write-once, which means the data cannot be corrupted."
 

Cons

"The vendor needs to changes billing to work like every other business and stop charging people if they stop using your service."
"They don't support a more current version of VMware."
"This product did not help our organization."
"I would like to see a better method of backing up Exchange in the cloud."
"In the future, we are looking for solutions combining both local and cloud backup from a single management platform that was initially not yet available."
"The price may be higher as per the competition from local market brands like Acronis or Veeam."
"The solution may be improved by allowing integration with other platforms."
"Where there is a problem is it does not have enterprise-level backup or multi-cloud workloads."
"Navigating through folders and finding files can be a bit slow, taking up to three to five seconds between clicks, which feels slow compared to the speed in SharePoint or a browser."
"The tool does not support Google Support. I have only Microsoft 365 customers. I don't have a good solution for my G-suite customers."
"I think new IT workers will struggle to recover data from Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup due to the user interface."
"They should adapt to new parameters as the market grows."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Billing practices for iLand are monthly. If you are a business and would like a yearly rate, good luck."
"The licensing costs are approximately $12,000 annually."
"iland is affordable."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"This is a cost-effective solution."
"The product's pricing is fair and competitive."
"The price is reasonable compared to other products."
"The product's pricing is based on the customer's needs because every customer is different."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is that it is good but not expensive.
What needs improvement with Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup?
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is good so far and I do not think it can be improved.
What is your primary use case for Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup?
My main use case for Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is to take backup of Office 365 and Intune. To back up Office 365, I use Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup to recover files or mailboxes, and to r...
 

Also Known As

iland Secure Cloud Backup
Barracuda Cloud to Cloud Backup
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bluestone, rentokil, BBA Aviation, gbe converge, navigator gas, omninet
Delta Dental Plans Association
Find out what your peers are saying about 11:11 Cloud Backup vs. Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.