Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Oracle Cloud Object Storage | 3.9% |
| Amazon S3 | 14.1% |
| Amazon S3 Glacier | 13.8% |
| Other | 68.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 57 |
Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.
Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements
Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.
Brinks
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Sr Quality Engineer at Accenture | 3.5 | We use Oracle Cloud Object Storage primarily for large-scale applications in the cloud, valuing its high availability and stability with large datasets. However, its usability could improve, especially in real-time operations, and technical support is often slow. |
| Cloud Specialist at a legal firm with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | I have used Oracle Cloud Object Storage for storing unstructured data and deploying core banking solutions. It offers multi-region support and scalability, but lacks a load balancer similar to Azure and AWS. It's more secure than other providers. |
| DBA Competency Manager at 4iApps | 4.0 | I find Oracle Cloud Object Storage cost-effective and reliable for backups, though usability and data retrieval could be simpler. It's stable, highly scalable, and well-supported, but setup and interface improvements would enhance the overall experience. |
| IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | I have been using Oracle Cloud Object Storage with the E-Business Suite for around five years, appreciating its manageability, scalability, and security. Despite previously using Amazon for different purposes, I find Oracle's lifecycle management particularly helpful and rate it nine out of ten. |
| President at Asvesot C.A. | 5.0 | I use JBoss on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure for multiple services due to its good performance, cost-efficiency, security features, and ease of use, and I’m satisfied with the support, continuous feature updates, and overall platform stability. |
| Oracle Technology Artchitect and Specialist at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.5 | No summary available |
| IT Infrastructure Manager at Lojas Renner SA | 4.5 | I found Oracle Cloud Object Storage performance good, though improvements and better integration with other platforms would help. Its affordability and compatibility with our Oracle-based systems led us to switch from Azure, despite Azure's superior integration with Microsoft tools. |
| Senior Data and Analytics Engineer at Deloitte | 4.0 | I use Oracle Cloud Object Storage for a Data Lakehouse and appreciate its structured organization. It's stable and scalable, though I’d like better data integration and user experience. Overall, I rate it eight out of ten. |
