Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Share your experience using OpenVINO

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 94,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Computer Vision Engineer at Ivideon
User
Cross-platform support boosts video analytics development for commercial projects
Pros and Cons
  • "The runtime of OpenVINO is highly valuable for running different computer vision models."
  • "It would be great if OpenVINO could convert new models into its format more quickly."

What is our primary use case?

I am a computer vision developer who uses OpenVINO to build video analytics systems for commercial purposes.

What is most valuable?

The runtime of OpenVINO is highly valuable for running different computer vision models. I use it primarily for this purpose. Additionally, I sometimes use the quantizer to make the models run faster. OpenVINO's cross-platform support, especially on MacOS with Apple silicon, is a significant feature.

What needs improvement?

It would be great if OpenVINO could convert new models into its format more quickly. The PyTorch model hub has more models compared to the OpenVINO model hub. It would also be beneficial if the support for Apple silicon was improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with OpenVINO for about two years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

The initial integration of OpenVINO had challenges such as switching to sync time, but overall, OpenVINO was easy to deploy.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

OpenVINO is quite stable, especially on x86 processors. I do not recall experiencing any critical errors.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

OpenVINO is very scalable, rating nine out of ten. It effectively runs on high-power server machines, particularly with CPUs.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I used PyTorch and TensorFlow for model development, but OpenVINO is the first tool I used for deployment.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of OpenVINO is rated an eight. Its good documentation facilitates a relatively fast setup process.

What about the implementation team?

One person is sufficient for deploying OpenVINO. For maintenance, one or two people are generally enough.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I evaluated NVIDIA TensorRT and other solutions using TensorFlow and PyTorch, but their scope differs since they are not specifically for deployment.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I rate OpenVINO eight out of ten. While it works well with CPUs, its limitation to CPUs can be a restriction when high-power GPUs are required.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
Mahender Reddy Pokala - PeerSpot reviewer
AI Developer at University of Chicago
Real User
Top 10
Improved model deployment on edge devices, but compatibility and scalability present challenges
Pros and Cons
  • "Intel's support team is very good."
  • "Scalability is a challenge with OpenVINO, particularly when I try to connect multiple streams of input or run multiple edge devices consecutively."

What is our primary use case?

I used OpenVINO for almost three years, starting in 2020. My initial use case involved attempting to connect or run models using quantization within cameras as edge devices instead of processing all input frames on a server. This was aimed at performing surveillance analysis within the home, like fire detection or human fall detection.

What is most valuable?

I found OpenVINO's ability to convert custom models into its format particularly beneficial, as businesses sometimes require unique models specific to their use cases. Utilizing OpenVINO allowed me to run these custom models on devices directly, which I found quite impressive. Additionally, the Model Zoo offered by OpenVINO added value to the product.

What needs improvement?

One improvement could be making OpenVINO less dependent on Intel-based processing chips. Expanding cross-platform compatibility, allowing it to work beyond Intel and its edge devices, would be beneficial. It should support different hardware platforms with certain requirements rather than being hardware-dependent.

For how long have I used the solution?

I used OpenVINO for almost three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

OpenVINO occasionally experienced breakdowns, especially when I was running it in production environments. Issues like overload or out-of-memory were not uncommon. However, the Intel team was helpful in resolving these, especially when I was converting large models. Despite occasional problems, updates have improved its stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is a challenge with OpenVINO, particularly when I try to connect multiple streams of input or run multiple edge devices consecutively. I found it unclear how to scale it effectively, as running two cameras was similar to one, but scaling to one hundred was problematic.

How are customer service and support?

Intel's support team is very good. They are responsive, whether I contact them via Discord or email. They assist thoroughly, asking relevant questions to understand the environment and provide solutions. I rate their service around eight out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I tried partnering with Intel, using their 3D cameras and OpenVINO, but due to scalability issues, I decided not to proceed.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is quick for those with technical expertise. I found installing it in Ubuntu OS easier, given its command-line nature. Although Mac is also manageable, Windows can be more challenging and requires more steps.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The OpenVINO software itself is open source and not priced. However, I found edge devices, such as cameras, can be somewhat expensive, around $150.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend OpenVINO based on use case. It works well for one or two cameras but struggles when scaling to a large number. Overall, I rate OpenVINO around 6.5. My experience is from one and a half years ago, so current conditions might be different.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate