Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Netskope Private Access Logo

Netskope Private Access Reviews

Vendor: Netskope
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Netskope Private Access?

Netskope Private Access is an integral component of the Netskope Security Cloud platform that provides zero-trust secure access to enterprise applications and data in hybrid IT (public cloud and data center) environments. It offers comprehensive policy management, compliance assessment, and supports any application, protocol, and device to reduce risk and simplify security operations.

Get the Netskope Private Access Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Netskope Private Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform and more!
Netskope Private Access is the #9 ranked solution in top ZTNA services. PeerSpot users give Netskope Private Access an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. Netskope Private Access is most commonly compared to Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks: Netskope Private Access vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks. Netskope Private Access is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 58% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 11% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Netskope Private Access
October 2025
Get the report
Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Featured Netskope Private Access reviews

Read more reviews

Netskope Private Access mindshare

As of October 2025, the mindshare of Netskope Private Access in the ZTNA as a Service category stands at 4.7%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ZTNA as a Service Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Netskope Private Access4.7%
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform17.4%
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks13.7%
Other64.2%
ZTNA as a Service

PeerResearch reports based on Netskope Private Access reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryZTNA as a ServiceOct 31, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersOct 31, 2025Download
ComparisonNetskope Private Access vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange PlatformOct 31, 2025Download
ComparisonNetskope Private Access vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto NetworksOct 31, 2025Download
ComparisonNetskope Private Access vs Cato SASE Cloud PlatformOct 31, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks4.113.7%92%65 interviewsAdd to research
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform4.217.4%98%64 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Netskope Private Access offers efficient security without traditional VPNs, enabling rapid remote access. It provides robust application control, device checks, and adaptive policies. Users experience low latency and no bandwidth limits. Advanced security, including DLP and filtering, ensures protected access. Deployment is easy, with user-friendly UI and integration. Cost-effective with lower maintenance than traditional VPNs, it supports dynamic user needs with scalable, secure global access, and detailed app access segmentation.
  • "The main benefit for users from Netskope Private Access would be secure access from anywhere; they can easily access their systems or applications in their office premises or on-premises environment in a very secure way and the organization can also be assured knowing that whatever access they have been providing to their remote users goes through proper checks and balances before access is provided."
  • "Netskope Private Access covers a wide range of use cases with solutions for client-server and server-to-client connectivity patterns."
  • "In the VPN scenario, what was happening, the user would get back to the complete source. But in NPA, the application will go to the user. There is an outbound connection. There is no inbound. Storage providers are also not there. It's the best feature because it is the replacement of the VPN."

Room for Improvement

Netskope Private Access should include SD-WAN and improve cost efficiency. It needs better on-premises checks, user-friendliness, and DLP policies customization. Integration and support for broadcast protocols, IPv6, ICMP, and server connectivity require enhancement. Addressing agentless access security, developing features faster, and improving global market presence could boost its standing. Users experience implementation challenges, connectivity issues, and a need for data protection strategies, monitoring, and broader DLP and inspection engines for private access traffic.
  • "In some cases, it is a tedious task to do the integration where the application is not that open or it is not supported out-of-the-box from Netskope."
  • "Netskope Private Access could improve by enhancing visibility of user performance and application performance. It should also integrate wider DLP and inspection engines on private access traffic."
  • "Netskope needs to provide some kind of data protection strategy as well because, currently, if you connect through private access, we don't have any data protection policies or implementation."

ROI

The ROI from Netskope Private Access is highly satisfactory. Users praise its ability to enhance security measures and provide seamless remote access. It was noted that the software effectively protected sensitive data, leading to increased trust and peace of mind. Additionally, users appreciated the ease of use and the overall positive impact on productivity.

Pricing

Netskope Private Access is considered cost-effective by many enterprise users compared to competitors. The subscription-based pricing operates on a per-user, per-year model. Users highlight its competitive price, particularly favorable for large organizations. While not the cheapest option, its value justifies the investment, with opportunities for discounts based on feature selection and customer size. It's noted as a more affordable alternative to some solutions like Zscaler but may be costly for smaller businesses.
  • "It is significantly cost-effective compared to its contenders."
  • "The tool's price is normal. It is not very cheap but good compared to the competitors."
  • "There was about 60% ROI, just in terms of savings. We had 40% to 60% reduction in monthly operational costs by using Netskope."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily utilize Netskope Private Access for secure internal and remote access, replacing traditional VPNs. It enables seamless connection to internal resources, supports Zero Trust Network Access, and enhances security policies. Providing frictionless user experiences, it supports digital transformation and compliance by allowing secure connectivity for remote and office-based users. Netskope Private Access also facilitates user-based policy creation, managing access for specific teams and applications on proprietary servers or cloud infrastructure.

Service and Support

Technical support is responsive and multilingual, with availability from pre-sales to post-sales. While queries sometimes face delays, efficient responses and comprehensive solutions are often provided. Migration issues due to updated prerequisites required assistance, especially with connectivity. Support technicians are proactive but ticket processing can take weeks. Users report satisfaction with prompt assistance, though there are occasional persistent challenges, particularly with China-related issues. Overall, customer service is rated highly by many users.

Deployment

Netskope Private Access's initial setup is user-friendly and straightforward. Many companies appreciate its lightweight design and cloud GUI. Organizations can easily register devices and create policies. The deployment often requires minimal staff and time. Documentation is clear, and the user interface supports seamless configuration. Users frequently highlight the ease of management across multiple locations, finding it simple to transition from traditional VPNs to Netskope's advanced security framework.

Scalability

Netskope Private Access excels in scalability, often rated between eight to ten. It efficiently handles thousands of users, supporting large deployments without latency issues. Although modules and licenses enhance scalability, limitations exist for mobile devices. Its architecture allows seamless transitions between publishers to maintain performance. Organizations are satisfied with its ability to scale out, supporting numerous concurrent connections, especially for larger companies that may face more complex challenges. As a cloud-based service, it ensures easy scalability.

Stability

Users generally find Netskope Private Access to be stable, often rating it around eight out of ten. Occasional issues arise with data center switching causing temporary disconnections. Defining access policies is necessary for optimal performance. Users appreciate troubleshooting features in the web UI, which help resolve configuration issues. While some experience complexities based on environment intricacy, they find it more reliable than traditional VPNs. Despite minor outages, service continues without significant business impact.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Netskope Private Access Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business70
Midsize Enterprise45
Large Enterprise161
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
6%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Government
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Retailer
4%
Legal Firm
3%
Non Profit
3%
Media Company
3%
Construction Company
2%
University
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%

Compare Netskope Private Access with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Netskope Private Access

Netskope Private Access customers

Evalueserve, Stroock, Apria, Ather Energy

Related questions

  • 106
Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) vs. Netskope Private Access (NPA)
  • 80
Which is the best choice of Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?
  • 35
How is Zero Trust different from the Least Privileged model?
  • 17
Best Alternative for Zscaler Private Access
  • 19
What is Cybersecurity Mesh and how is it related to Zero Trust?
  • 9
What is ZTNA as a service?
  • 92
When evaluating ZTNA as a Service solutions, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 7
When evaluating ZTNA as a Service, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 106
Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) vs. Netskope Private Access (NPA)
  • 6
What are your top Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) predictions for 2022?

Product Categories

Product Categories
ZTNA as a Service

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Netskope Private Access
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Netskope Private Access
Cloudflare One vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Cloudflare One vs Netskope Private Access
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Netskope Private Access
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Netskope Private Access
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Netskope Private Access
Appgate SDP vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Appgate SDP vs Netskope Private Access
JumpCloud vs Netskope Private Access Logo
JumpCloud vs Netskope Private Access
Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Netskope Private Access
Jamf Connect vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Jamf Connect vs Netskope Private Access
Google BeyondCorp Remote Access vs Netskope Private Access Logo
Google BeyondCorp Remote Access vs Netskope Private Access
See all alternatives
 
Netskope Private Access Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Presales Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees4.0I've used Netskope Private Access for over four years to ensure secure, seamless remote access, appreciating its device checks and adaptive policies, though integration can be tricky and DLP support would further enhance its capabilities.
Network Service Specialist at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees4.5I used Netskope Private Access primarily as a VPN replacement for internal resource access. Its flexible, scalable solutions for connectivity were valuable, though it could enhance user and application performance visibility. I evaluated Zscaler ZTNA during my search.
Regional Manager at Orange4.0I’ve found Netskope Private Access effective for remote and office users, with strong scalability and stability, though setup can be complex. It competes with Zscaler, and I’d rate it 8 out of 10 overall.
Security Architect Manager at Aboitiz Equity Ventures, Inc.4.5Netskope Private Access secures our infrastructure connections with a seamless user experience, offering advanced security features like DLP and web filtering. We've improved ROI and reduced costs by replacing our VPN with Netskope while utilizing AWS as our cloud provider.
Associate Presales Lead at a tech services company with 201-500 employees4.5I use Netskope Private Access to replace legacy VPNs, offering secure outbound connectivity and cost-effectiveness. It eliminates bandwidth limits and maintenance costs but needs improvement in DNS mapping. Compared to others, Netskope is cheaper and aligns with pricing standards.
Senior System Engineer - Microsoft Azure Cloud at a retailer with 51-200 employees4.0We use Netskope Private Access for secure access to remote desktop and Active Directory resources. It allows policy control for private apps, though it lacks ICMP or ping support, complicating connectivity tests. We considered Zscaler, which supports ICMP.
Network Security Specialist at Sogefi Group5.0We deployed Netskope Private Access for robust internet security and VPN access for remote users. It excels in configurability and security but faces issues in China due to the Great Firewall. Netskope is more cost-effective than Zscaler.
Security Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees5.0We use Netskope Private Access for seamless end-user experience across environments. Its granular application access is impressive, but agentless access security needs improvement. We achieved significant ROI, reducing infrastructure costs and replacing cumbersome VPN solutions due to Netskope's flexibility and superior features.