Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM DOORS Next Logo

IBM DOORS Next Reviews

Vendor: IBM
3.9 out of 5
406 followers
Start review

What is IBM DOORS Next?

Featured IBM DOORS Next reviews

IBM DOORS Next mindshare

As of June 2025, the mindshare of IBM DOORS Next in the Application Requirements Management category stands at 9.1%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Requirements Management

PeerResearch reports based on IBM DOORS Next reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Requirements ManagementJun 1, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJun 1, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM DOORS Next vs IBM DOORSJun 1, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM DOORS Next vs JiraJun 1, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM DOORS Next vs Polarion RequirementsJun 1, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Jira4.115.5%91%274 interviewsAdd to research
IBM DOORS4.032.9%88%55 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
22%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
Transportation Company
5%
Construction Company
5%
University
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Retailer
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Engineering Company
2%
Hospitality Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Media Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
 

IBM DOORS Next reviews

Sort by:
JT
System Engineer at Toll Collect GmbH
Verified user of IBM DOORS Next
May 21, 2025
Traceability and structured requirements management support comprehensive project processes

Pros

"The usability of IBM DOORS Next is very good, and the features are very good."

Cons

"In my opinion, IBM DOORS Next does not have any Agile support, and that is why for requirement analysis, IBM DOORS Next is correct, but for someone who is working in an Agile process, IBM DOORS Next is not the solution because it is not integrated into the Agile working process."
DB
Senior Technical Product Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of IBM DOORS Next
Jan 4, 2024
A quite scalable requirement management tool that offers good performance

Pros

"My company contacts the solution's technical support, and they are good and responsive."

Cons

"IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is not a very user-friendly product."
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DOORS Next. Updated May 2025
853,831 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Roger Trackwell - PeerSpot user
System Engineering Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of IBM DOORS Next
Aug 29, 2022
An industry-leading tool to demonstrate traceability between requirements, with valuable features for tailoring modules and managing several thousand requirements

Pros

"One of the most valuable features is how you can tailor the modules."

Cons

"The only additional feature would be if it had dynamic linking to other MBSE tool sets or industry-leading tools. "
PeerSpot user
Project System Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of IBM DOORS Next
Dec 24, 2022
Reliable, easy to make updates to requirements and can handle sizeable documentation

Pros

"As far as maintaining our requirements so that we can have copies of them, it's good. I can print it out if necessary."

Cons

"It does have a tendency to condense the requirements. It kind of puts them in a tree format. Sometimes those trees are a little difficult."
Kapil Raikar - PeerSpot user
Senior Manager – Development, PD, Data Virtulization at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Verified user of IBM DOORS Next
Sep 19, 2022
Has the capability to extend or add extensions to the data model

Pros

"There are many good features with DOORS. The solution has a concept of streams and baselines, as well as a concept of components. A component is a subproject inside a project."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the APIs that they have exposed for integration."
Rahul Kumar Jangir - PeerSpot user
System Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of IBM DOORS Next
Apr 18, 2024
A PLM solution that offers good control and configuration management with global and local configurations

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is displaying requirements in a tabular format. This means you can see everything laid out in columns and rows. It is more aesthetic compared to other tools. The traceability matrix helps to view things better. It comes with different linking rules. "

Cons

"IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation has room for improvement compared to other tools like Polaris and Jama Connect. These tools offer more flexibility and options for developers, which IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation lacks. For example, you can define your link rules in Jama Connect, but you can't do that in IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation. "
HZ
Technical Sales Specialist at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of IBM DOORS Next
Jan 16, 2022
Product version discussed: 7.0.2
Offers good scalability as it's easy to expand to different servers

Pros

"IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is easier to expand to build a backend with several servers, so you can also use it to scale up to several hundreds of users without major problems."

Cons

"Both the data storage and reporting for this solution need improvement."
Lasse Mikkonen - PeerSpot user
Principal Consultant at Contribyte
Verified user of IBM DOORS Next
Mar 3, 2025
Efficient audit processes save costs while complex UI and slow support need improvement