I am not too sure about the archiving feature. It has that capability, but I'm not too sure if it's categorized as archiving as per German or European law. We need something revised in a safe backup so it can be held up in court. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Quest QoreStor a seven out of 10.
You need some familiarity with Linux as the system operates on it. There was a big learning curve for me when it came to that. Quest provided help with commands, but understanding Linux basics beforehand is useful. I would rate Quest QoreStor a ten out of ten. I am very happy with it so far.
New users should use a supported configuration for their appliance for installing the software. Work with a certified installer for the software so that it is installed properly and you get the proper support. You can consider buying an appliance that is preinstalled by a certified Quest QoreStor provider, like us at EDSI. It will make the long-term support of the product and reliability much more successful. I would rate QoreStor a ten out of ten for what it offers for the price. It is a great product. There are a lot of features for a customer or an IT managed services provider to work with. Quest makes it very easy to work with them. Their representatives provide great customer support to us as a managed services provider. That is why I would rate the product as a ten out of ten.
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Sep 2, 2021
We may be slightly behind the current version, although that is only because I am too busy with other things to upgrade it at the moment. My advice for anybody who is looking into implementing QoreStor is to plan well. Evaluate what you have and plan for the capacity. From my experience, I would have to say that working with the Quest technicians to do remote implementation was definitely a time-saver and worth the cost. The biggest lesson that I have learned from using this product is that backup to file is actually more than adequate, and really a time-saver compared to backing up to tape. One caveat is that we do not have an easy method of backing up to removable media at this time. If it was more scalable in that manner, to back up to removable media, then that would be helpful. Part of that may have been in our planning stages, as we didn't consider that with the hardware that we purchased. In any event, it would be nice if it had an easier method to replicate to removable media that could be safely taken offsite and stored independently. Not cloud, not offsite as in remote storage, but something we could actually physically take from the building and put it in a safe somewhere. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
My advice for people who would like to buy QoreStor is they can look at the price model. It is hardware-independent, so it is not like an appliance where you shop for the specific hardware. In our case, when we deal with HP, HP can run QoreStor on their platform or server. So, the pricing is focused on the software, and it includes everything. We internally don't use cloud storage for long-term data retention. We only use it for testing. The cloud is a value-add for now, and it is an interesting feature that we expect our customers to look into in the future. Similarly, its Object Direct feature allows you to move an object directly to the cloud without having to de-hydrade and re-hydrade the backups, but we haven't really started to use it for our backup. We only use it for testing internally. We expect that customers will start to look into this feature. The reason why it's so important is that you save a lot of space in the cloud when you just move the dedupe object to the cloud. In terms of whether QoreStor has reduced our backup storage requirements, it certainly did significantly reduce our storage needs. For customers, we can offer up to the maximum of what QoreStor is capable of. It is around 300 terabytes, and we are able to support the maximum. If you go to the cloud, then you can have three times more. For example, if you have a unit with 100 terabytes, then you can have an additional 300 terabytes in the cloud with the same license. I would rate Quest QoreStor an eight out of 10. The reason why it is not a 10 is that it is still a new product, and they need to increase their capacity.
Manager, IT Systems Services at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Apr 19, 2021
It's a good product. QoreStor has a lot of features that I don't know about. It would be nice to take advantage of these features by getting updates from them that these features exist. I would rate it a nine out of ten.
Executive Director at Fenway Library Organization Inc
Real User
Apr 14, 2021
If you're in a situation where you're still using tape, at a minimum, this is worth investigating. For me, the biggest lesson was the exposure it gave me to the cloud environment. Prior to using this, I had heard people talk about AWS, and I had heard semi horror stories about how you never know what it's going to cost you if you get involved in that environment. We worked with our local co-location company and they had built out their own cloud environment. So it was a really good opportunity for me to dip my toes in cloud. From what I can tell, Quest is clearer about what your costs are going to look like. In this case, we're just paying for that cloud storage cost. They give me a number so that I can calculate, based on how many terabytes of data, what it's going to look like, and what it is potentially going to look like a year or two from now. If my data continues to grow at the rate it's growing, then I know it's within the tolerance of what I can afford. That was a great learning experience. It was nice to move down the technology path and to get a little more familiar with the cloud environment. That was a useful step forward for a small business, like ours, that hadn't really been there. Along with the deduplication, it also provides replication and archiving capabilities, but we don't run that. You have to build out another infrastructure somewhere else to do that, or maybe have another license of QoreStor that they can mount somewhere else. We haven't needed to go to that level. Prior to using Qorestor, we hadn't ever done any cloud backups. But when it starts to back up into the cloud there's a pretty big spike on IO as all that data is moving across. When I look at my IO over 24 hours, there are two big spikes which happen when the data is flowing into the cloud environment. I'm not sure it would make any difference, but the cloud environment is also in the same location as our cabinet infrastructure, our server infrastructure. We're right in the same data center where the cloud equipment is. It hasn't compromised our network traffic in any fundamental way. Overall, it just does the job. I don't really have to think about it. It was really just the complexity of the setup that would drop my rating of it a little bit, to eight out of 10. But my experience has been good with it.
QoreStor optimizes storage costs through advanced deduplication and compression, seamlessly integrating with backup infrastructures and supporting diverse hardware. It enhances data security with replication and offers flexible deployment with minimal maintenance.QoreStor offers significant benefits in deduplication, which leads to space savings and reduced storage expenses. This system integrates effortlessly with backup platforms like NetVault and Veeam, functioning as a reliable backup...
I am not too sure about the archiving feature. It has that capability, but I'm not too sure if it's categorized as archiving as per German or European law. We need something revised in a safe backup so it can be held up in court. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Quest QoreStor a seven out of 10.
You need some familiarity with Linux as the system operates on it. There was a big learning curve for me when it came to that. Quest provided help with commands, but understanding Linux basics beforehand is useful. I would rate Quest QoreStor a ten out of ten. I am very happy with it so far.
New users should use a supported configuration for their appliance for installing the software. Work with a certified installer for the software so that it is installed properly and you get the proper support. You can consider buying an appliance that is preinstalled by a certified Quest QoreStor provider, like us at EDSI. It will make the long-term support of the product and reliability much more successful. I would rate QoreStor a ten out of ten for what it offers for the price. It is a great product. There are a lot of features for a customer or an IT managed services provider to work with. Quest makes it very easy to work with them. Their representatives provide great customer support to us as a managed services provider. That is why I would rate the product as a ten out of ten.
Overall, I would rate it a ten out of ten. Issues with QoreStor occur only when there is a power outage. Other than that, it works perfectly.
We may be slightly behind the current version, although that is only because I am too busy with other things to upgrade it at the moment. My advice for anybody who is looking into implementing QoreStor is to plan well. Evaluate what you have and plan for the capacity. From my experience, I would have to say that working with the Quest technicians to do remote implementation was definitely a time-saver and worth the cost. The biggest lesson that I have learned from using this product is that backup to file is actually more than adequate, and really a time-saver compared to backing up to tape. One caveat is that we do not have an easy method of backing up to removable media at this time. If it was more scalable in that manner, to back up to removable media, then that would be helpful. Part of that may have been in our planning stages, as we didn't consider that with the hardware that we purchased. In any event, it would be nice if it had an easier method to replicate to removable media that could be safely taken offsite and stored independently. Not cloud, not offsite as in remote storage, but something we could actually physically take from the building and put it in a safe somewhere. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
I would rate QoreStor a nine out of ten.
My advice for people who would like to buy QoreStor is they can look at the price model. It is hardware-independent, so it is not like an appliance where you shop for the specific hardware. In our case, when we deal with HP, HP can run QoreStor on their platform or server. So, the pricing is focused on the software, and it includes everything. We internally don't use cloud storage for long-term data retention. We only use it for testing. The cloud is a value-add for now, and it is an interesting feature that we expect our customers to look into in the future. Similarly, its Object Direct feature allows you to move an object directly to the cloud without having to de-hydrade and re-hydrade the backups, but we haven't really started to use it for our backup. We only use it for testing internally. We expect that customers will start to look into this feature. The reason why it's so important is that you save a lot of space in the cloud when you just move the dedupe object to the cloud. In terms of whether QoreStor has reduced our backup storage requirements, it certainly did significantly reduce our storage needs. For customers, we can offer up to the maximum of what QoreStor is capable of. It is around 300 terabytes, and we are able to support the maximum. If you go to the cloud, then you can have three times more. For example, if you have a unit with 100 terabytes, then you can have an additional 300 terabytes in the cloud with the same license. I would rate Quest QoreStor an eight out of 10. The reason why it is not a 10 is that it is still a new product, and they need to increase their capacity.
It's a good product. QoreStor has a lot of features that I don't know about. It would be nice to take advantage of these features by getting updates from them that these features exist. I would rate it a nine out of ten.
If you're in a situation where you're still using tape, at a minimum, this is worth investigating. For me, the biggest lesson was the exposure it gave me to the cloud environment. Prior to using this, I had heard people talk about AWS, and I had heard semi horror stories about how you never know what it's going to cost you if you get involved in that environment. We worked with our local co-location company and they had built out their own cloud environment. So it was a really good opportunity for me to dip my toes in cloud. From what I can tell, Quest is clearer about what your costs are going to look like. In this case, we're just paying for that cloud storage cost. They give me a number so that I can calculate, based on how many terabytes of data, what it's going to look like, and what it is potentially going to look like a year or two from now. If my data continues to grow at the rate it's growing, then I know it's within the tolerance of what I can afford. That was a great learning experience. It was nice to move down the technology path and to get a little more familiar with the cloud environment. That was a useful step forward for a small business, like ours, that hadn't really been there. Along with the deduplication, it also provides replication and archiving capabilities, but we don't run that. You have to build out another infrastructure somewhere else to do that, or maybe have another license of QoreStor that they can mount somewhere else. We haven't needed to go to that level. Prior to using Qorestor, we hadn't ever done any cloud backups. But when it starts to back up into the cloud there's a pretty big spike on IO as all that data is moving across. When I look at my IO over 24 hours, there are two big spikes which happen when the data is flowing into the cloud environment. I'm not sure it would make any difference, but the cloud environment is also in the same location as our cabinet infrastructure, our server infrastructure. We're right in the same data center where the cloud equipment is. It hasn't compromised our network traffic in any fundamental way. Overall, it just does the job. I don't really have to think about it. It was really just the complexity of the setup that would drop my rating of it a little bit, to eight out of 10. But my experience has been good with it.