If I were to put the support on a scale from one to ten, I would give a score of four. We are users without any partnerships with BlueCat. Somebody needs to see how the application is running on it, and it also needs to be updated. The versions of BlueCat need to be updated, and while we faced some challenges there, it went with support. Overall, I rate Micetro a seven out of ten.
Community and Customer Marketing Co-op at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Jun 8, 2026
 Thank you for sharing your feedback and for your honest assessment of your experience with Micetro. We're sorry to hear that your support experience and upgrade process did not meet expectations. We encourage you to reach out to our Customer Success team so we can better understand the challenges you encountered, review your environment, and help ensure you're running the latest recommended version with the best possible experience.
I would recommend Micetro because it is easy to operate. In larger teams, different roles can be assigned to people. It is easy to maintain and provides much more inside information about what's on your network. I would rate Micetro a nine out of ten.
Director of Infrastructure at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
Jun 14, 2024
I would rate Micetro ten out of ten. Micetro requires minimal maintenance; we'll only need to install updates. While automatic updates might be available, we follow the standard practice of manually reviewing update information before installation. This occasional task is the extent of Micetro's maintenance needs. Initially hesitant to grant Micetro full control, we used it as a basic IPAM system without write-back capabilities or active DNS. We quickly recognized this as a mistake and enabled Micetro's full functionality. The product has been flawless, with no issues like bad records or duplicate IPs. Trust the product and leverage its full potential from the start.
I would rate Red Hat Enterprise Linux nine out of ten. Organizations seeking to reduce costs associated with RHEL support or those with internal teams capable of managing and supporting the operating system can leverage the open-source version. Our system administrators handle maintenance, and we additionally cover annual maintenance costs. I recommend adhering to best practices and maintaining the system regularly for optimal stability.
DDI (DNS-DHCP-IPAM) streamlines the management of IP addresses, DNS services, and DHCP configurations, making network administration more effective and efficient.
DDI solutions centralize and automate the core services that enable network communication. By integrating DNS, DHCP, and IP address management into a single system, organizations can reduce errors, enhance security, and improve overall network reliability. These solutions suit enterprises of all sizes looking to manage...
If I were to put the support on a scale from one to ten, I would give a score of four. We are users without any partnerships with BlueCat. Somebody needs to see how the application is running on it, and it also needs to be updated. The versions of BlueCat need to be updated, and while we faced some challenges there, it went with support. Overall, I rate Micetro a seven out of ten.
 Thank you for sharing your feedback and for your honest assessment of your experience with Micetro. We're sorry to hear that your support experience and upgrade process did not meet expectations. We encourage you to reach out to our Customer Success team so we can better understand the challenges you encountered, review your environment, and help ensure you're running the latest recommended version with the best possible experience.
I would recommend Micetro because it is easy to operate. In larger teams, different roles can be assigned to people. It is easy to maintain and provides much more inside information about what's on your network. I would rate Micetro a nine out of ten.
I would rate Micetro ten out of ten. Micetro requires minimal maintenance; we'll only need to install updates. While automatic updates might be available, we follow the standard practice of manually reviewing update information before installation. This occasional task is the extent of Micetro's maintenance needs. Initially hesitant to grant Micetro full control, we used it as a basic IPAM system without write-back capabilities or active DNS. We quickly recognized this as a mistake and enabled Micetro's full functionality. The product has been flawless, with no issues like bad records or duplicate IPs. Trust the product and leverage its full potential from the start.
I would rate Red Hat Enterprise Linux nine out of ten. Organizations seeking to reduce costs associated with RHEL support or those with internal teams capable of managing and supporting the operating system can leverage the open-source version. Our system administrators handle maintenance, and we additionally cover annual maintenance costs. I recommend adhering to best practices and maintaining the system regularly for optimal stability.