Sometimes, I use CodePipeline to integrate applications on my EC2 server. Sometimes, I use it with AWS Lambda. I am working as a DevOps engineer. I provide technical support to customers who are using the product. I have to demonstrate the customers' issues and try to resolve them. I recommend the solution to experienced people. If someone uses Amazon’s DevOps tool, I will recommend the solution. Otherwise, I will not recommend the product. Overall, I rate the product a seven to eight out of ten.
In addition to Maven, CodeBuild supports Gradle. Gradle builds have some issues. The tool provides more control over the underlying agent containers. Earlier, we used in-house products. I will recommend the solution if someone is using AWS. It comes with an entire ecosystem. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
We have integrated AWS CodePipeline with AWS services such as Amazon EKS, ECS, and EC2 for virtual machine deployments. We can integrate it with Lambda for event triggering. It is a useful service. It is straightforward to understand for new users who are learning the application deployment through pipelines. While Jenkins requires installation, server setup, and security considerations, CodePipeline simplifies the process by handling the underlying infrastructure, allowing users to concentrate solely on pipeline scripts. I rate the product an eight out of ten.
People using the solution for the first time must have good experience in troubleshooting. If we do something wrong, we should be patient enough to solve it. We should not get frustrated. A good networking experience in AWS and a good knowledge of IP addresses will also be helpful. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Senior ict specialist at Information& eGov Authority
Real User
Top 5
2023-01-06T17:02:42Z
Jan 6, 2023
I would recommend this solution to others as it is one of the most valuable products that can help any DevOps environment for software. Overall, I would rate this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
Build automation tools automate the time-consuming tasks inherent in creating a “build,” or usable version of an application. They automate and orchestrate the sometimes complex processes of compiling computer source code into binary code and packaging that binary code as well as running automated tests
Some PeerSpot members use build automation solutions. In reviews, they offer opinions on the most significant selection factors to consider when looking at this type of software. One theme...
Sometimes, I use CodePipeline to integrate applications on my EC2 server. Sometimes, I use it with AWS Lambda. I am working as a DevOps engineer. I provide technical support to customers who are using the product. I have to demonstrate the customers' issues and try to resolve them. I recommend the solution to experienced people. If someone uses Amazon’s DevOps tool, I will recommend the solution. Otherwise, I will not recommend the product. Overall, I rate the product a seven to eight out of ten.
In addition to Maven, CodeBuild supports Gradle. Gradle builds have some issues. The tool provides more control over the underlying agent containers. Earlier, we used in-house products. I will recommend the solution if someone is using AWS. It comes with an entire ecosystem. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
We have integrated AWS CodePipeline with AWS services such as Amazon EKS, ECS, and EC2 for virtual machine deployments. We can integrate it with Lambda for event triggering. It is a useful service. It is straightforward to understand for new users who are learning the application deployment through pipelines. While Jenkins requires installation, server setup, and security considerations, CodePipeline simplifies the process by handling the underlying infrastructure, allowing users to concentrate solely on pipeline scripts. I rate the product an eight out of ten.
People using the solution for the first time must have good experience in troubleshooting. If we do something wrong, we should be patient enough to solve it. We should not get frustrated. A good networking experience in AWS and a good knowledge of IP addresses will also be helpful. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
I rate AWS CodePipeline an eight out of ten.
I would rate the product an eight out of ten. If you have a multi-cloud infrastructure, then you need to consider Jenkins, GitLab or GitHub.
My advice to others is the implmentation process will take some time because of the poor documentation. I rate AWS CodePipeline a six out of ten.
I would recommend this solution to others as it is one of the most valuable products that can help any DevOps environment for software. Overall, I would rate this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
I'd give it a ten out of ten. It's the best tool. It's good for AWS, however, if you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it.