VulnCheck Reviews

My main area of interest in testing VulnCheck was vulnerability intelligence and prioritization. I wanted to understand how VulnCheck enriches vulnerability records with exploit information and provides exploitation context. This information can help security teams distinguish vulnerabilities that need urgent attention from those that can be reviewed according to their risk and environment.

Exploit details included information about known exploits, proof of concept availability, exploit maturity, and exploitation activity. When it comes to rich risk context, additional information helps determine how urgently a vulnerability should be addressed, such as exploitation evidence and vulnerability severity.

I evaluated VulnCheck's vulnerability intelligence capabilities focusing on exploit details, exploitation timelines, and exploit maturity information. This evaluation helped me understand how exploit intelligence can support vulnerability prioritization.

VulnCheck has positively impacted my organization by saving time and providing exploit intelligence that adds valuable content when reviewing security findings. Rather than relying on severity scores, the team can consider whether exploitation information is available when deciding what to investigate first.

It has reduced the manual effort required to gather vulnerability information and check exploit availability. This made the triage process more focused, though I have not measured an exact amount of time saved.

The exploit intelligence helps the team prioritize vulnerabilities based on exploitation evidence and maturity, allowing them to focus remediation efforts on higher-risk issues first. I would assess that impact using remediation times, outstanding critical vulnerabilities, and confirmed exposure reduction, which may also help reduce vulnerability backlog and improve security posture over time.

The best features that VulnCheck offers in my opinion are exploit intelligence, vulnerability enrichment, exploitation timelines, and information about exploit maturity. These details provide content-based insights beyond a basic vulnerability score and help teams make better-informed prioritization decisions.

The exploitation timelines and maturity information have been useful for understanding the status of known exploits. This content can help security teams prioritize vulnerabilities more effectively instead of relying on severity scores.

The exploitation data provides useful content about exploit availability, maturity, and exploitation activity. This information can help security teams understand vulnerability risk and prioritize remediations, although some technical details may be required as cybersecurity knowledge to interpret correctly.

VulnCheck provides useful exploit intelligence, which can help security teams identify vulnerabilities without any exploitation activity and prioritize urgent threats. Exploitation details and maturity information can support faster, more informed threat response decisions.

I am not currently using the Canary Intelligence feature, but I understand its potential value in providing early visibility into emerging exploitation activity and helping security teams prioritize threats.

VulnCheck's operational exploit artifacts can help security teams understand exploit behavior and improve detection and response planning. They may support the development and validation of detection rules and help analysts investigate suspicious activity more effectively.

VulnCheck's scanless exposure insight feature provides visibility into potential external exposure without requiring active scanning in the environment. Its effectiveness depends on the accuracy and coverage of available data, so findings should be validated before making critical security decisions.

VulnCheck's Initial Access Intelligence (IAI) artifacts provide useful context about vulnerabilities and exploitation techniques associated with initial access. This information helps security teams understand potential attack vectors, improve detection strategies, and prioritize defensive measures.

VulnCheck's EVI (Exploit Validation Intelligence) Index adds valuable context to CVE records by providing information about exploit maturity and real-world exploitation evidence. This helps security teams distinguish vulnerabilities with a credible exploitation signal from those that may be less urgent, thereby supporting more informed prioritization and remediation decisions.

VulnCheck's machine-readable intelligence supports security automation by making vulnerability exploit data easier to consume through integrations and APIs. This information helps automate vulnerability enrichment, prioritize findings, and support remediation workflows, with the actual impact depending on integration quality and how extensively the data is used in existing security processes.

A clearer onboarding process and more end-to-end integration examples would help new users get started with VulnCheck. I also value flexible reporting, easier ways to customize vulnerability prioritization, and practical guidance for connecting intelligence to existing security tools.

The documentation is useful for understanding vulnerability intelligence. I would mention that more step-by-step tutorials, practical API integration examples, and troubleshooting guides would make it easier for new users.

I have evaluated VulnCheck to understand its vulnerability and exploit intelligence capabilities. My experience is limited to the period and features I actually tested rather than long-term product use.

VulnCheck appears suitable for vulnerability intelligence workflows, but I have not conducted long-term production testing. To independently verify its stability, I would assess its availability by monitoring API availability.

VulnCheck appears scalable for growing security workloads because it offers paginated API queries, bulk data downloads, and documentation regarding limits for larger workloads, although coaching and higher API limits may be needed.

VulnCheck provides customer support through email, and eligible customers can access a dedicated customer success manager and engineer. Support is also available through Slack or Teams, web meetings, and phone calls, which helps with integration, troubleshooting, and product-related queries.

I have not contacted customer support yet, as we are in a trial version. The initial setup and everything was good, so I have not found the necessity for customer support until now.

I considered a general approach of using public vulnerability databases and existing vulnerability information sources. The key difference I wanted to understand is how exploit intelligence and additional vulnerability context could improve prioritization, and I did not conduct a comprehensive comparison of commercial alternatives.

I have used VulnCheck in my organization to deploy in a public cloud.

I have not calculated a measurable return on investment. The potential value lies in reducing manual effort in gathering vulnerability information and helping teams prioritize remediation; quantifying ROI would require measuring time spent on triage, remediation outcomes, and integration costs.

My experience with VulnCheck's pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been limited to evaluation. I have not completed a full paid deployment, so I cannot accurately assess the total licensing cost. Before adopting it at scale, I would review the available price plans, usage limits, integration costs, and license terms to understand overall cost and value.

Before choosing VulnCheck, I mainly considered existing vulnerability intelligence sources, such as the NVD and CISA's known exploitation vulnerabilities from the KEV catalog. VulnCheck's focus on exploit intelligence, exploit maturity, and real-world exploitation evidence offers additional context for prioritizing vulnerabilities, and I would compare data coverage, update frequency, integration options, and licensing costs before making a final decision.

I rate VulnCheck documentation as eight out of ten if it matches your experience.

I chose the number eight because the documentation can help users understand vulnerability intelligence and exploit maturity. However, as I mentioned previously, more step-by-step tutorials for practical APIs and troubleshooting guides would make onboarding easier.

VulnCheck's vulnerability intelligence supports security governance by helping the team prioritize vulnerabilities using exploit-related information, while access control, secure API key management, and appropriate handling of sensitive security data become more important when integrated into existing workflows. I would also assess the platform's security documentation, access management, and compliance requirements before adopting it in production.

Accurate vulnerability intelligence and reliable exploit information are important for effective security prioritization. VulnCheck's exploit details and maturity information help analysts assess vulnerabilities more effectively. Findings should still be validated against trusted sources and organization environments, and I would evaluate data coverage, update frequency, and consistency before relying on them for critical security decisions.

VulnCheck is worth evaluating if you need vulnerability intelligence and CVE data for security workflows before committing. Test its data coverage, API integration, documentation, and pricing against your requirements to ensure it fits your use case.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

I mainly use VulnCheck for vulnerability intelligence and prioritization. It helps us identify vulnerabilities that are more likely to be exploited and focus our investigation and remediation efforts on the most critical risk. This helps the SOC work more efficiently with the vulnerability management team.

One example of how I have used VulnCheck for prioritization in my daily work is when we have a large number of vulnerabilities reported across our environment. I use VulnCheck to check the threat and exploitation context of a vulnerability and prioritize the ones that are actively exploited or have a high risk of impact. This helps us focus on the most important vulnerabilities first instead of treating every vulnerability with the same priority.

Another use case is using VulnCheck to enrich vulnerability information with threat intelligence. In my day-to-day work, it helps me understand which vulnerabilities need immediate attention and provides additional context for investigations and remediation decisions.

In my opinion, the best features VulnCheck offers are its vulnerability intelligence, exploitation tracking, and risk-based prioritization. I find the threat context especially useful because it helps us identify vulnerabilities that are more likely to be exploited and focus our remediation efforts accordingly.

The exploitation tracking feature has helped my team because it helps us understand which vulnerabilities are being actively exploited or are more likely to be targeted. This gives us better context when prioritizing vulnerabilities and helps the team focus on urgent remediation instead of treating all vulnerabilities equally.

Another useful feature is threat intelligence context around vulnerabilities. It helps us connect vulnerability information with real-world threats, which makes prioritization and communication with the vulnerability management team easier. Overall, it helps us focus on the vulnerabilities that present the most immediate risk.

VulnCheck has impacted my organization positively by helping us improve how we prioritize vulnerabilities by giving us better threat and exploitation context. Instead of focusing only on severity scores, we can identify vulnerabilities that have a higher likelihood of being exploited. This helps us use our security resources more effectively and respond to higher risk vulnerabilities faster.

VulnCheck has helped us improve vulnerability prioritization and reduce the time spent reviewing a large number of vulnerabilities. We are able to focus faster on vulnerabilities with active exploitation and higher threat relevance. I do not have a specific organization-wide metric to share, but the main improvements have been more efficient prioritization and better context of remediation decisions.

VulnCheck could be improved with more detailed remediation guidance and easier integration with vulnerability scanners and ticketing systems. It would also be helpful to have more customization options for risk scoring and prioritization. These improvements would make it easier to fit VulnCheck into existing SOC and vulnerability management workflows.

One improvement I would like to see is more detailed context around the real-world impact of a vulnerability, along with clearer remediation recommendations. Better reporting and dashboard customization would also help teams communicate higher priority vulnerabilities more easily. Overall, making the workflow more streamlined would improve the day-to-day experience.

I have been using VulnCheck for 1.5 years.

I would say VulnCheck scales well because it is cloud-based and API-driven, so it can support growing volumes of vulnerability and threat intelligence data without requiring significant additional infrastructure. From my experience, it works well as the number of vulnerabilities and assets increases, and the API makes it easier to integrate the intelligence into existing security workflows.

The customer support is good.

We have seen a positive impact on efficiency, mainly through faster vulnerability prioritization. VulnCheck reduces the time spent manually researching exploitability and threat context for individual CVEs, allowing the team to focus on the vulnerabilities that need immediate attention. I do not have a specific organization-wide ROI figure, but the improved prioritization and reduced manual effort have been valuable.

My advice would be to consider VulnCheck if your team needs better exploit intelligence and more context for vulnerability prioritization. I would recommend integrating it with your existing vulnerability management and security tools so the intelligence can be used directly in the recommendation workflow. Also, start with a few high-priority use cases and expand after the team is comfortable with the platform.

I rate VulnCheck as nine out of ten because its vulnerability intelligence and exploitation tracking provide useful context for prioritizing risk. What keeps it from being a ten is that I would like to see more integrations, deeper remediation guidance, and more customization options for risk prioritization.

I think VulnCheck's AI capabilities have a good approach to governance and security, especially since vulnerability and threat intelligence data can be sensitive. From a SOC perspective, I would want strong access controls, data protection, and clear visibility into how AI-generated recommendations are produced. Human validation is still important before making major remediation decisions.

I find VulnCheck's AI-assisted output useful for providing additional context and helping with vulnerability prioritization. The results are generally helpful, but I would still validate important findings against other threat intelligence sources before making critical remediation decisions. Overall, it works well as an analyst aid rather than a complete replacement for human judgment.

I find VulnCheck's first-party exploitation intelligence relatively easy to understand. The exploitation context helps me quickly determine whether a vulnerability is being actively exploited or has a higher likelihood of exploitation. This makes it easier to prioritize vulnerabilities without spending too much time researching each one manually.

I find VulnCheck's early exploit visibility useful because it can give the team an earlier indication that a vulnerability may become a real threat. This helps us prioritize investigation and remediation sooner instead of waiting for the vulnerability to become a major incident. It supports a more proactive approach to threat response.

We use the operational exploit artifacts to add more context to vulnerability investigations. They help the team understand how a vulnerability could potentially be exploited and use that information to improve detection and prioritize remediation. This gives the SOC and vulnerability management teams more actionable information during investigations.

I find the EVI index useful because it adds more context to a CVE beyond the standard severity score. The exploit maturity and real-world evidence help us better understand which vulnerabilities are more likely to become an actual threat. This makes vulnerability prioritization more practical for the SOC and vulnerability management teams.

I find Scanless Exposure Insight useful for getting an initial view of potential exposure without running an active scan. It can help us quickly identify systems or vulnerabilities that may need attention and prioritize for the investigation. This is especially helpful when we want faster visibility without adding scanning activities to the environment.

VulnCheck has improved efficiency mainly by reducing the manual effort needed to research CVEs and determine their exploitability. My rating for this review is 9 out of 10.

Private Cloud

Microsoft Azure

My main use case for VulnCheck is verifying and monitoring information efficiently as part of our day-to-day workflow, and it helps us to quickly check relevant details, identify potential issues, and keep the process more organized instead of relying entirely on manual checks.

One example of how I use VulnCheck in my daily workflow is during a routine verification task where we need to quickly validate information before moving forward; it helps us to identify the relevant details in one place and reduce the amount of manual checking involved, which makes the process quicker and gives the team more confidence in the information we are working with.

One thing I would add about my main use case for VulnCheck is that it is useful because it brings the verification process into a more structured workflow, reducing some of the repetitive manual checking and making it easier for the team to review information consistently before taking the next step.

The best features that VulnCheck offers are the verification capabilities, centralized information, and the ability to streamline repetitive checking tasks. I also appreciate that the workflow is relatively straightforward, which makes it easier for the team to review information consistently without adding too much manual effort.

The main benefit of the centralized information feature in VulnCheck is having the relevant information available in one place instead of checking multiple sources manually; it makes it easier for the team to review details, compare information, and keep the verification process consistent, which saves some time and makes the overall workflow easier to manage.

I appreciate that the features of VulnCheck are focused on making the verification process simpler and more organized, as the combination of centralized information and a streamlined workflow reduces repetitive manual work while still giving the team enough visibility to review the details before making a decision.

Overall, VulnCheck has positively impacted my organization by making our verification workflow more organized and efficient; it reduces some of the repetitive manual checking and gives the team a more consistent way to review information, which helps us save time and focus more on tasks that require actual analysis or decision making.

VulnCheck could be improved by making the interface even more intuitive and adding more customization around how information is displayed and reviewed; more detailed reporting and clearer explanations when a verification result needs attention would also be helpful, and these improvements would make the workflow quicker, especially for users who are new to the platform.

Another improvement for VulnCheck would be adding more automation for repetitive verification tasks and giving users greater control over notifications; better integration with existing tools would also be useful as it could reduce the need to switch between different systems and make the overall workflow more efficient.

One other area of VulnCheck that can be improved is the integration experience; more readymade integrations and simpler configuration with existing security and IT tools would make it easier to incorporate VulnCheck into established workflows, and better customization of dashboards and notifications would also be useful for different teams and use cases.

I have been using VulnCheck for around six months.

Overall, I have found VulnCheck to be stable and reliable in day-to-day use; the platform has been consistent when accessing vulnerability and exploit intelligence, and we have not experienced any major stability issues, making it dependable for supporting our regular security analysis and prioritization workflows.

VulnCheck scales well for our needs; as the volume of vulnerability and security data increases, it remains useful for organizing and prioritizing the information without adding a lot of manual effort, and the centralized approach also makes it easier for the team to use the platform as our security environment grows.

Overall, the customer support for VulnCheck has been good; the team has been responsive when we have had questions about the platform or needed help understanding specific intelligence, and their guidance has been useful during troubleshooting, although faster resolution on more complex issues would make the experience even better.

We previously relied more on traditional vulnerability intelligence sources and manual research, and moved to VulnCheck because we wanted more actionable exploit intelligence, better visibility into real-world exploitation, and a more efficient way to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual risk.

Overall, the pricing and licensing experience for VulnCheck has been fairly straightforward; the licensing structure was easy to understand, and the initial setup did not require a lot of overhead from our side, with the main value being that the platform brings useful threat and vulnerability intelligence together without creating a complicated management process.

We have not calculated a formal ROI with specific financial figures for VulnCheck, but the qualitative impact has been quite positive; the biggest benefit is time saved during vulnerability and threat prioritization because the intelligence provides more context around exploitability and real-world activity, helping the team focus on the issues that need attention instead of spending as much time manually researching them.

We evaluated a few vulnerability and threat intelligence options before choosing VulnCheck, mainly comparing them on the quality of exploit intelligence, real-world evidence, risk prioritization, ease of use, and how actionable the information was for our security team, and VulnCheck fit well with the way we wanted to prioritize our vulnerabilities.

I would recommend VulnCheck to teams that want more actionable vulnerability and exploit intelligence rather than relying only on standard severity scores; before getting started, define how you want to prioritize vulnerabilities and integrate the intelligence into your existing workflow, as once that is clear, the platform can provide useful context for making remediation decisions. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

My main use case for VulnCheck is for IT management and case management, as it is a good product to manage IT services for our current organization.

I use VulnCheck for IT or case management in my organization, managing desktop, laptop, and renting data products to deploy the services for customers, and engaging the clients. We are using VulnCheck day to day; it is a very good product for engaging customers, data management, and processing. Currently, we are using it for that only.

VulnCheck offers the best features including time saving and money saving, having no occupancy for the remote connection, connection, and data transformation; it is a very good product for transforming data from one way to another.

For processing the data, using VulnCheck is very fast, so we can say it is time saving. The money-saving aspect is significant too; when we connect through VulnCheck, customers do not ask for money or anything, and they provide free services to the organization.

The reliability of VulnCheck is good, and the ease of use is also good. VulnCheck has positively impacted my organization, as I have noticed improvements; it is very fast. The improvements I notice include client happiness and faster response times.

VulnCheck is already good, and I do not wish for anything to change. Everything is fine, and there are no improvements needed for VulnCheck that I have not mentioned yet.

I have been using VulnCheck for the past one and a half years.

VulnCheck is stable.

VulnCheck's scalability is very good.

Customer support is nice. I will give the customer support a rating of 10 out of 10.

Previously, we have not used any solution before VulnCheck; we directly switched to it.

My experience with VulnCheck's pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good for all of these aspects.

I purchased VulnCheck through AWS Marketplace.

I have seen a return on investment, including money saved and time saved.

My experience with VulnCheck's pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good for all of these aspects.

We have not evaluated other options before choosing VulnCheck.

The governance and security of VulnCheck is good; AI governance and security are mostly in line with my expectations.

The accuracy and reliability of output from VulnCheck is very good compared to other products. VulnCheck is deployed in a public cloud, hybrid cloud, and on-premises setup. We are using Amazon, Google Cloud, and Microsoft as our cloud providers for VulnCheck.

I find understanding the exploitation data provided by VulnCheck's first-party exploitation intelligence to be all good. My impression of VulnCheck's early exploit visibility is that it provides faster response, with no need for improvement; it is a good product.

I utilize the operational exploit artifacts provided by VulnCheck, which are good for team management and managing IT services, deploying processes for our current organization. For real-world evidence, the EVI index provided by VulnCheck is good; all aspects are good, and VulnCheck provides good services for our organization.

The scanless exposure insight feature is good, providing positive responses. I give a positive response to others looking into using VulnCheck software. I would rate this review a 10 out of 10 overall.

Over the year and a half that I have been dealing with VulnCheck, I have also worked with numerous similar solutions. I know the market and understand the similarities and what VulnCheck can do, what it cannot, and what other competitors offer within the field.

Essentially, what we are looking to accomplish with VulnCheck is to enable organizations to view vulnerabilities that exist within the cybersecurity landscape. I am taking this to partners to then sell to their customers, but their customers are simply looking for a way to sift through thousands of CVEs or new vulnerabilities. Traditional tools will just give you a long list. VulnCheck is an exploit intelligence platform that takes all that mass of information and then provides you with a clear view of the major vulnerabilities that need attention.

A partner or customer has used VulnCheck to take a load of CVE scores or vulnerability scores and then identify which ones are dangerous in the real world. It essentially indicates if a bug is dangerous, shows you how hackers are getting in, and where the attacks are coming from. This is facilitated by the IP intelligence feature, which gives contextualized data that matters because, at the end of the day, it can indicate how quickly a business can be breached or compromised. The core idea is simple, as it examines all different vulnerabilities and provides context to which ones have been found and how they can breach your organization.

I am focused on enterprise security teams and government critical national infrastructure, all collating data. What VulnCheck does is based on real-life exploitability and is continuously updated with intelligence to focus on what really matters. It does not generate a long list full of noise and is a very proactive solution.

In my opinion, the best feature of VulnCheck is the vulnerability intelligence piece, which enriches vulnerability data beyond just standard databases. It provides context regarding the validity of exploit availability and the attacker's activity. Essentially, it can answer the question: Is this bug dangerous? Could it breach us in a real-world attack? Another valuable feature is the IP intelligence, which identifies attackers' infrastructure, specifically the command and control servers, showing where the attacks are originating from.

Our customers and partners typically use the IP intelligence feature by employing AI and ML to find, connect, and prioritize signals indicating that a vulnerability is being exploited. It is not a single model; it is a pipeline of data collection with enrichment and scoring, and I also utilize AI extraction. This is where AI kicks in to highlight what is vulnerable, providing a kind of correlation.

I would probably say that the main feature of VulnCheck is its ability to cut down all the noise and provide a scoring of how you are going to get attacked and breached. It then utilizes intelligence to show you where the attacker is located.

VulnCheck needs improvement in terms of data. It is primarily an intelligence and data layering system and not a complete vulnerability management platform. This means that it lacks native patch workflows, so you do not have asset discovery as you would with Tenable or Qualys. You will require other tools to act on the data that you find, which necessitates engineering time for API integration, data mapping, and tuning. Additionally, not all exploit signs are clear; some can be noisy or ambiguous, so teams need to apply their judgment. Finally, the time to value is not instant; it requires integration, workflow changes, and team training.

I think VulnCheck is an excellent tool and valuable data resource. However, if you wish to send alerts via an API to platforms like Rapid7 or Tenable VM, you will need to integrate that with a SIEM solution to perform any kind of risk management.

I have been using this product for a year and a half. 

Although I do not have the exact numbers for VulnCheck, I can categorize the ROI into three buckets: preventing breaches, which is the most significant value; faster detection, which translates to real savings; and operational efficiency, which is often hidden but represents a real ROI. The average breach costs around five million, and incidents can be stopped by monitoring vulnerabilities on a daily basis. VulnCheck detects exploitable vulnerabilities days to weeks earlier than alternatives, with customer detection averaging just under six and a half days sooner than most competing products, resulting in an estimated $145,000 risk avoided per incident and about $700,000 risk avoided.

VulnCheck has shifted the mindset within my organization and my partners from a reactive to a more proactive approach. By contextualizing vulnerabilities and understanding how people get breached, VulnCheck gives us the ability to adopt a proactive mindset rather than a reactive one. More often than not, a reactive approach leads to responding to breaches instead of being on top of vulnerability management.

I would definitely recommend looking into VulnCheck as a solution.

I think it is a really good tool to find vulnerabilities and help identify what is exploitable within your infrastructure. However, if you are seeking something to manage or take action on your vulnerabilities, you will still need a vulnerability management tool or a SIEM solution to facilitate any actions. Overall, it is an easy-to-use tool that provides simple ways to view risks without much noise.

On-premises

Other

VulnCheck serves as our primary vulnerability management platform for managing organizational vulnerabilities. VulnCheck is exceptional because it provides not only CVE listings of exploited vulnerabilities but also known exploited vulnerabilities, referred to as KEV, enabling us to assess ransomware associations and proof-of-concept availability. This allows us to ensure that our EPSS score is reliable and receive notifications for any vulnerabilities that are globally exposed.

As a vulnerability management tool, VulnCheck scans our on-premise environment and cloud infrastructure, primarily on AWS. It provides comprehensive results of all vulnerabilities present on our endpoints, servers, hosts, or network devices. VulnCheck also provides the initial CVSS score for all vulnerabilities, which is later elevated to EPSS scores based on breaches recorded worldwide, including known exploited vulnerabilities, ransomware associations, proof-of-concept availability, and attacker activity in the environment. We conduct these local and hybrid scans throughout our organization and prioritize the vulnerabilities for remediation.

We have scheduled scans during our downtimes on Sundays and Saturdays, allowing us to receive comprehensive updates regarding vulnerabilities across our public cloud and on-premises environments. This approach ensures reliable updates and visibility on vulnerabilities, where VulnCheck's scans are quick and efficient, unlike Rapid7, which often fails to accurately scan cloud resources.

VulnCheck has positively impacted our organization. Initially, we had thousands of vulnerabilities on the server side. After introducing VulnCheck, we constantly monitor the vulnerabilities and the EPSS score, which updates based on real threats associated with existing vulnerabilities in the market. This has enabled us to identify, correlate, and find solutions to upgrade our systems, servers, hosts, and network devices, ensuring everything is up-to-date and secure from potential attackers. Therefore, VulnCheck plays a crucial role for us, and the reporting is clear and to the point, making the major vulnerability patching process simple and efficient.

Before using VulnCheck, our vulnerability count exceeded 4,000, but after three to four months of using it, we are down to just hundreds, which represents the major improvement we have seen on the server level. The endpoints and network devices are managed effectively because we can reboot and patch them as needed.

The best features VulnCheck offers are the feasible scans it provides and the local and hybrid scans that are very helpful for gathering vulnerability details and prioritizing the exploits or vulnerabilities happening worldwide. Additionally, the comprehensive exploit intelligence, including all the POCs and ransomware associations, stands out. The detailed descriptions of all present vulnerabilities along with emerging threats, well-documented details, and frequent updates of threat intelligence contribute significantly to reducing the remediation workload by prioritizing the vulnerabilities that matter most.

VulnCheck is an emerging next-generation AI-implemented vulnerability security tool, and its governance and security capabilities are impressive. The AI capabilities enhance the EPSS scores, making them more specific and helpful for prioritizing remediation. VulnCheck is a reliable tool that supports multi-tenancy and multi-cloud environments, with effective scans for both on-premises and cloud assets. It is essentially a one-stop solution for all vulnerability management needs.

VulnCheck outputs are very consistent, with a level of precision in outputs, and the remediation status for vulnerabilities is immediately actionable as soon as we complete remediation. The stability of daily vulnerability intelligence operations is maintained, with a consistent threat integration feed and API responses delivering smooth updates.

Regarding improvements needed for VulnCheck, there are not many areas, as the pre-built integrations with common vulnerability scanners and SIMS are seamless. Integration with ITSM ticketing tools is also quite good. However, it would be beneficial to have more customizable dashboards and executive-level reporting, as well as improved visibility into vulnerability remediation.

I chose a rating of nine for VulnCheck because some parts, such as the implementation aspect and the patch remediation trackers, are lacking. Additionally, VulnCheck could benefit from providing simpler executable dashboards and more conceptual insights, potentially taking references from Rapid7 for the reporting and remediation project areas.

I have been using VulnCheck for more than 1.5 years.

VulnCheck is stable, and I have not experienced any issues with uptime or reliability.

VulnCheck scales exceptionally in our organization, regardless of size. As an AI-driven and cloud-hosted tool, it integrates efficiently with enterprise vulnerability management workflows and supports a large number of assets and vulnerability records without needing additional infrastructure.

We have not engaged with VulnCheck's customer support because we already use multiple vulnerability tools. However, others have reported positive responses and helpful documentation available regarding various reports missing in the tool.

Before utilizing VulnCheck, we used Rapid7 InsightIDR. Switching to VulnCheck is cost-effective and reliable, using VulnCheck intelligence for risk-based remediation instead of merely prioritizing vulnerabilities by CVSS score. We continuously monitor newly published KEVs and exploit intelligence for timely risk management, highlighting significant improvements in risk-based vulnerability management and efficient remediation processes.

We previously used Rapid7 due to scanning issues, but after switching to VulnCheck, our operations have improved considerably. Pricing for VulnCheck is more favorable compared to Rapid7.

Since using VulnCheck, we see a significant return on investment as we no longer spend excessive time on scanning, which was an issue with Rapid7. VulnCheck provides a solid security vulnerability management solution that allows SOC analysts to work more efficiently without wasting time.

I do not have visibility on the pricing, setup costs, and licensing for VulnCheck, as only higher management is involved in those decision-making processes.

We did not evaluate other options before selecting VulnCheck.

I have completed everything regarding my main use case and any unique ways I use VulnCheck in my environment. I have added all the points regarding VulnCheck. If you are looking for a one-stop solution for vulnerability management that offers lower costs and superior visibility into vulnerabilities, then VulnCheck is the right choice. We do not use the operational exploit artifacts provided by VulnCheck. My overall rating for VulnCheck is nine out of ten.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

My primary day-to-day use case for VulnCheck is for vulnerability management, where I mainly use it to review findings, review vulnerabilities, find, prioritize critical and high severity issues, track remediation status, and also follow up with the respective teams until vulnerabilities are solved.

A recent example of how I've used VulnCheck would be when it identified a vulnerability on a server; I reviewed the vulnerability details, affected asset, and the severity, then coordinated with the infrastructure team for the patching. After remediation, I checked the asset in VulnCheck to confirm the vulnerability was resolved.

The best features of VulnCheck are centralized vulnerability visibility, risk prioritization, remediation tracking, and reporting.

I find myself relying most on the centralized vulnerability visibility and risk prioritization because it gives me a clear view of the affected asset and helps me focus on the critical and high severity vulnerabilities first, making my daily monitoring and remediation follow-up much more efficient.

We see improvement in our vulnerability visibility and remediation process with VulnCheck, as it helps us in identifying and prioritizing the critical vulnerabilities faster and also helps us track the vulnerabilities more efficiently, providing clear reports to the relevant teams. Overall, it has helped us reduce manual tracking and improve our security posture.

VulnCheck is stable for our daily vulnerability management, and we haven't experienced any downtime or reliability issues.

The best features of VulnCheck are centralized vulnerability visibility, risk prioritization, remediation tracking, and reporting.

I find myself relying most on the centralized vulnerability visibility and risk prioritization because it gives me a clear view of the affected asset and helps me focus on the critical and high severity vulnerabilities first, making my daily monitoring and remediation follow-up much more efficient.

We see improvement in our vulnerability visibility and remediation process with VulnCheck, as it helps us in identifying and prioritizing the critical vulnerabilities faster and also helps us track the vulnerabilities more efficiently, providing clear reports to the relevant teams. Overall, it has helped us reduce manual tracking and improve our security posture.

The main benefit is faster remediation and better visibility rather than a specific headcount reduction.

VulnCheck is a really good tool, but it could be improved with a more user-friendly dashboard and also with more detailed vulnerability context.

I would like to see more out-of-the-box integrations, such as integration with SIEM, EDR, and also with any ticketing platform, while alert customization could also be better, with more flexible severity and notification rules. For reporting, a more customizable dashboard and trend-based reports would be useful for both the SOC team and management.

It is overall really good, but there is a little bit of improvement lacking in the UI and the integration, which is why I took off that one point.

I have been using VulnCheck for one year.

VulnCheck is stable for our daily vulnerability management, and we haven't experienced any downtime or reliability issues.

VulnCheck has good scalability, as it has handled an increasing number of assets and vulnerabilities as our organization is growing, allowing us to use it across our changing vulnerability management needs without major performance issues.

I don't have experience with the customer support because I haven't reached out, but I think it's good.

We did not use any other solution.

I have a rough estimate of a twenty to thirty percent improvement in remediation efficiency for the workflows we track, allowing us to identify the critical vulnerabilities faster and reduce the time spent on manual tracking and follow-ups.

My advice would be to start with a clear vulnerability management goal and integrate VulnCheck with your existing security and ticketing tools, using its risk prioritization and remediation tracking features efficiently while ensuring the team responsible for patching is aligned with the workflow to help you get value from the platform quickly. I gave this review a rating of nine out of ten.

Private Cloud

Microsoft Azure

My main use case for VulnCheck is vulnerability intelligence and prioritization, especially to identify which vulnerabilities are actively exploited.

The best features VulnCheck offers are exploit intelligence and KEV-style tracking, real-time vulnerability enrichment, API integration with existing tools, and clear prioritization based on risk.

VulnCheck's real-time vulnerability enrichment and API integration have significantly helped my workflow. This provides a practical vulnerability management experience rather than textbook answers. From my experience with VulnCheck, this is one of the most valuable features. We often see hundreds of CVEs from scans, but not all are actually dangerous. VulnCheck helps us identify which vulnerabilities are being actively exploited or are listed as similar to known exploited vulnerabilities. Instead of patching everything blindly, we focus first on vulnerabilities that attackers are actively using, which makes our response much more practical.

When a new CVE comes in, VulnCheck adds details including exploit availability, attack complexity, and real-world usage. Instead of just seeing the CVSS score, we understand the actual risk, which helps in better decision-making. We integrated VulnCheck with our vulnerability scanning and SIEM tools, and when vulnerabilities are detected, the API enriches them automatically with threat intelligence. This reduces manual effort and speeds up prioritization. The clear prioritization based on risk is probably the biggest day-to-day benefit. Instead of handling hundreds of vulnerabilities equally, we focus on actively exploited ones, internet-facing assets, and critical systems, which helps us reduce the noise and focus on what really matters.

The most important features—exploit intelligence and prioritization—have the biggest impact on real life. In our organization, the biggest impact is that exploit intelligence and knowing whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited changes how we spend our resources. It helps reduce the noise from vulnerability scans by focusing on what really matters.

VulnCheck's UI and reporting can be improved for better visibility. More customization in dashboards and reporting would be helpful for management-level insights.

I have been using VulnCheck for around one year.

VulnCheck is stable.

VulnCheck scales well since it is API-driven.

Support for VulnCheck is very responsive, active, and helpful.

We relied on a basic vulnerability scanner and public CVE databases previously.

We have seen ROI mainly through better prioritization and reduced effort on low-impact vulnerabilities.

The pricing is reasonable for the value VulnCheck provides, especially for threat intelligence. We evaluated the differentiation and licensing options.

We looked at other threat intelligence sources and platforms.

Do not rely only on CVSS scores; instead, use tools such as VulnCheck to understand real-world risk. In today's environment, prioritization is key, and VulnCheck helps focus on vulnerabilities that actually matter. I would rate this review an 8.

Public Cloud

Google

I primarily use VulnCheck for newly discovered vulnerabilities and the remediation time period for those vulnerabilities, with the team reviewing the severities.

Using VulnCheck with real-world threat data, it has a capability where it updates 14 days before the NVD National Vulnerability Database has updated.

That is my main use case for VulnCheck.

I find that VulnCheck's best features include using CVSS, mapping it to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, and tagging indicators of compromise.

The features of mapping CVSS to the MITRE ATT&CK framework and tagging indicators of compromise help my team assess risks based on the severity: high, medium, low, and common.

The unique feature of VulnCheck is the 14-day advance notice, as it provides data on exploits with exploits, which is a very quick update compared to the NVD and open CVEs.

VulnCheck positively impacts my organization by enabling risk-based reduction, identifying actively exploited vulnerabilities, and providing valuable insights.

When I mention service-based reduction and identifying active risks, I notice faster remediation times and that we are compliant as per the SOC 2 Type 2 terms, which is the best threat intel so far.

I wish VulnCheck could improve by having a scoring system that is domain-based, IP-based, and reputation-based, along with an internal capability for checking internal inventory vulnerabilities.

My main addition about needed improvements is that if VulnCheck works on the inventory of the software my organization uses, it would be really helpful.

I have been using VulnCheck for over a year.

VulnCheck is stable.

VulnCheck demonstrates good scalability.

I find that customer support is good, and I'm impressed.

Previously, I used a security scorecard, a domain rating level scorecard that provides a security rating, but it didn't have as many capabilities, so I switched to VulnCheck.

Currently, I find the pricing of VulnCheck to be reasonable and not much expensive.

Before choosing VulnCheck, I compared it with Security Scorecard, and that was the extent of my evaluation.

As a security engineer, I find it very easy and manageable to understand the exploitation data provided by VulnCheck's first-party exploitation intelligence.

With VulnCheck's early exploit visibility, I can remediate vulnerabilities quickly, making timely decisions before the vulnerabilities are known to the public and hackers.

I utilize operational exploit artifacts provided by VulnCheck, which help me prioritize them sooner based on severities and check the exploit status in terms of how deep the exploit can penetrate.

VulnCheck's scanless exposure insight feature is useful whenever scanning is not permitted, allowing me to perform vulnerability checks.

I have utilized the Initial Access Intelligence (IAI) artifacts, which add value to my security measures through data validation, active checks, and access control, ensuring only authorized users can access.

It is about the remediation of vulnerabilities to make it faster and to make sooner decisions based on the exploit status, which is the main factor.

I advise others looking into using VulnCheck to ensure it is useful for their specific needs and to check if the scope matches what VulnCheck offers.

I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Other

My main use case for VulnCheck is vulnerability checks, which allows us to check what vulnerabilities we have in our dependencies, ensuring we are on the latest versions of the dependencies we are using in the code, and it also manages the CVSS score.

The primary use case of VulnCheck is to enhance our vulnerability management by helping us identify vulnerabilities that are already actively exploited. For example, the CVSS score of Log4j, which is a well-known vulnerability, can be easily detected across all modules and potentially entangled between different modules. These are critical scenarios as we prioritize our remediation efforts based on exploit intelligence rather than relying solely on CVSS scores.

When VulnCheck flagged the Log4j vulnerability, it provided an alert to the security team, which was handed over as a Jira ticket. We fixed it right away. It was not a production issue because production had a version without that CVSS score, but the vulnerability was real and we checked everything behind the VPN.

I use VulnCheck for vulnerability checks, as we prioritize vulnerabilities across the entire infrastructure, allowing our security team to focus on critical risks, reducing remediation time by presenting everything on one page and improving the overall vulnerability management system.

VulnCheck offers helpful endpoint security, providing centralized visibility and enabling us to automate incident response effectively, translating that to the actual team responsible for fixes. Additionally, we really appreciate its backup and disaster recovery features and commendable network access control.

The biggest benefit of automated incident response with VulnCheck is reducing overall time in identifying and solving problems right away, which has reduced our mean time to recovery in scenarios where we need to identify vulnerabilities, as we already have complete information on the page to address the exact issue.

VulnCheck positively impacts our organization by allowing us to manage our secrets properly. We use the platform to detect exposed APIs, passwords, tokens, and other sensitive credentials across source codes or repositories, ensuring no API is exposed during our CI/CD pipeline and allowing us to maintain strong security policies for our cloud applications.

VulnCheck's early exploit visibility has positively influenced our threat response strategy by enabling us to check vulnerabilities faster while reducing overall time. We utilize a bot called Raccoon that creates a PR based on this exploitation data.

The scanless exposure insight feature of VulnCheck effectively provides exposure mapping without active scanning, as it maps everything first and only checks for changes, which saves time during CI/CD runs.

We have utilized the Initial Access Intelligence artifacts to better understand how attackers gain access to our systems, significantly improving our security posture by supporting faster threat hunting.

We have utilized VulnCheck's machine-readable threat intelligence feeds and API integrations, automating threat responses and eliminating manual analysis, giving us an edge in managing vulnerabilities.

I'm not completely sure how VulnCheck can be improved, but based on my experience, it does what it says, covering most features reliably. However, I suggest improvements in the reporting dashboard and customization for management understanding.

For the needed improvements, I would recommend making it simpler, as the current reporting is more catered to engineering, while management should easily access the dashboard. It should be straightforward enough for anyone to check.

Regarding VulnCheck's AI capabilities, I find that it currently lacks AI-driven capabilities. It mainly utilizes vulnerability checks and could benefit from integrating a small chatbot for better prioritization and summarization of vulnerabilities.

I have been working in my current field for two and a half years.

We evaluated other options before choosing VulnCheck, and I can confirm that it is stable. We have not faced any problems.

In terms of scalability, I have not experienced any issues. I'm not the primary manager of scalability, but there have been no trouble signs.

VulnCheck's customer support is good, and I have no complaints. They have been very helpful.

We previously used Tenable but switched due to pricing issues. This switch was not something I directly decided.

We have seen a return on investment, observing a reduction of 20% to 30% in critical and high-risk vulnerabilities due to the automated end-to-end flow, which significantly enhances our efficiency.

We have covered everything around VulnCheck's aspects that need discussion.

I have not utilized the operational exploit artifacts provided by VulnCheck.

I'm not using the Canary Intelligence feature. The security team manages it, and they may be utilizing it, but I do not have extensive information on that.

We have observed a measurable reduction in our vulnerability backlog since using VulnCheck, estimating a decrease of 20% to 35% for high-priority vulnerabilities and reducing our mean time to remediation for critical vulnerabilities by around 30%. I would rate this review an 8 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)