Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is DexGuard?

DexGuard mindshare

As of May 2025, the mindshare of DexGuard in the Mobile Application Management category stands at 46.8%, up from 43.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile Application Management
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
Legal Firm
5%
University
4%
Construction Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Educational Organization
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Maritime Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%

Compare DexGuard with alternative products

Learn more about DexGuard

Product Categories

Popular Comparisons

 

DexGuard reviews

Sort by:
AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot user
Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.
Verified user of DexGuard
Nov 6, 2022
Has code hardening and obfuscation features, and adds a security layer; user-friendly and easy to integrate

Pros

"DexGuard is one of the best products I've seen regarding the code hardening and obfuscation layers it can implement. It's a well-known product in the market, and it also has an open-source version called ProGuard which I also find valuable because it's more of an application optimizer for making your code sites smaller. What I like best about DexGuard is that it takes all the features of ProGuard and adds a security layer. DexGuard is also popular as a command line product that can be easily integrated with my company's system. I also like that it's not very difficult to understand as a product and is user-friendly."

Cons

"What needs improvement in DexGuard is its maturity level in terms of Flutter support. DexGuard doesn't cover every aspect of SDK protection, particularly for Flutter-based applications. The product just started supporting Flutter-based applications, so it's not yet on a mature level. Flutter is a platform widely used for mobile application development, and DexGuard still needs many improvements in supporting Flutter for obfuscation purposes. Compared to other products, onboarding DexGuard can be more challenging because it lacks evaluation. The DexGuard team gives a very technical demonstration. Still, there's no evaluation for this product, which means people have to judge it based on the demonstration only, which can be challenging. If you compare DexGuard with Alluvial or New Relic APM based on technical aspects, there's no problem with DexGuard because it's pretty stable. I've not heard anyone saying that it's a low-end product or that it doesn't meet requirements. However, other products can sometimes be a bit more economical when compared with DexGuard because the DexGuard team still has some low-hanging scenarios that need to be taken care of. As DexGuard is a sophisticated product, for example, it can give thirteen layers of obfuscation and a very high level of code hardening. It can catch particular issues and run time through ThreatCast. Hence, it has features that other products don't have, so you might have to pay a small premium based on specific scenarios, which makes other products more economical than DexGuard. This could be another area for improvement."
PeerSpot user
Senior Product Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Verified user of DexGuard
Oct 31, 2022
Good pricing, good support, and robust protection from reverse engineering and hacking

Pros

"Obfuscation is most valuable. One of our clients is using this particular solution because many times, we have seen hackers slowing the game and taking monetary benefits. It protects their mobile application from being hacked."

Cons

"The DexGuard implementation for the libGDX engine is quite tedious. "