Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Coverity Static effectively reduces false positives, allowing users to focus on genuine vulnerabilities and improve code quality.
It significantly enhances staff productivity, improving work quality by approximately 20%.
The security analysis and capabilities, such as interprocedural analysis, help in identifying critical vulnerabilities and ensuring software security.
The integration with tools like Jenkins and Jira supports seamless continuous integration and issue tracking, making development processes smoother.
Coverity Static is noted for its stability and scalability, ensuring consistent performance without downtime.

CONS

Coverity Static faces challenges with false positives, resulting in wasted time addressing issues that are not actual problems.
Reporting engine and integrations like SCM need significant enhancements to provide more robust and timely feedback.
The setup process is lengthy and complex, requiring improvements in ease of use and integration with developer workflows.
Customizability is limited, particularly in defining custom validation routines and checkers, hindering its adaptability to specific needs.
Coverity Static's pricing and licensing model are concerns, particularly in terms of user-based licenses and line of code restrictions.
 

Coverity Static Pros review quotes

VV
Apr 26, 2024
Coverity integrates with issue-tracking systems like Jira and provides email notifications, alerts, and other features.
reviewer1428837 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 30, 2020
The most valuable feature is that there were not a whole lot of false positives, at least on the codebases that I looked at.
VV
Oct 12, 2021
One of the most valuable features is Contributing Events. That particular feature helps the developer understand the root cause of a defect. So you can locate the starting point of the defect and figure out exactly how it is being exploited.
Learn what your peers think about Coverity Static. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BL
Apr 3, 2024
In my opinion, the most effective Coverity feature for identifying critical vulnerabilities is the extra checks, which offers deep analysis.
Md. Shahriar Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
May 3, 2024
The reporting feature is up to the mark.
AP
Nov 9, 2023
The interface of Coverity is quite good, and it is also easy to use.
it_user1316571 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 2, 2020
Coverity is quite stable and we haven’t had any issues or any downtime.
Yantao Zhao - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 4, 2019
The features I find most valuable is that our entire company can publish the analysis results into our central space.
GR
Jun 23, 2023
Coverity gives advisory and deviation features, which are some of the parts I liked.
Arun Dahiphale - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 20, 2024
The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.
 

Coverity Static Cons review quotes

VV
Apr 26, 2024
Coverity concerns its dashboards and reporting.
reviewer1428837 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 30, 2020
It should be easier to specify your own validation routines and sanitation routines.
VV
Oct 12, 2021
Right now, the Coverity executable is around 1.2GB to download. If they can reduce it to approximately 600 or 700MB, that would be great. If they decrease the executable, it will be much easier to work in an environment like Docker.
Learn what your peers think about Coverity Static. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BL
Apr 3, 2024
We're currently facing a primary challenge with automation using Coverity. Each developer has a license and can perform manual checks, and we also have a nightly build that analyzes the entire software. The main issue is that the tool can't look behind submodules in our code base, so it doesn't see changes stored there.
Md. Shahriar Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
May 3, 2024
The reporting tool integration process is sometimes slow.
AP
Nov 9, 2023
Coverity takes a lot of time to dereference null pointers.
it_user1316571 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 2, 2020
I would like to see integration with popular IDEs, such as Eclipse.
Yantao Zhao - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 4, 2019
The setup takes very long.
GR
Jun 23, 2023
SCM integration is very poor in Coverity.
Arun Dahiphale - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 20, 2024
It would be great if we could customize the rules to focus on critical issues.