We performed a comparison between Talend Data Management Platform and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution can run on any machine and that is a big advantage."
"The features that I like the most are the simplicity of the interface, and the ability to quickly develop with a predefined component."
"I like the way that you can use the context variables, and how you can work those context variables to give you values and settings for every development environment, such as PROD, TEST, and DEV."
"The most valuable feature is integration."
"The solution is very user-friendly and easy to understand."
"They're very competitive in terms of performance, which is a good selling point. It has very rich features. It provides a very rich feature set in the application."
"The basic tools are easy to pick up and understand."
"I like everything about this product, but the biggest thing is the ease of use."
"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."
"A product with good API and EDI components."
"The stability is good."
"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."
"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."
"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."
"The product must enhance the data quality."
"Once you get past the basic tools, it gets pretty complicated."
"I'd be interested in seeing the running of Python programs and transformations from within the studio itself."
"Performance and speed could be improved."
"They lack in memory capacity."
"The stability is good, but the performance is slower when I work on a huge amount of data."
"The solution's memory sometimes bottlenecks and that can be challenging."
"I would like to sync a project and do an upload from that current version, and then from GitLab, be able to download the latest one."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"One area that needs improvement is the version upgrade process. Many customers I've worked with encounter challenges when transitioning from their current version, such as x or 9, to a newer version. The process is not smooth, and they must shift their entire website."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."
"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."
"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."
More Talend Data Management Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Talend Data Management Platform is ranked 22nd in Data Integration with 17 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Talend Data Management Platform is rated 8.4, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Talend Data Management Platform writes "Built for everything and packed with features but there are some monitoring limitations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Talend Data Management Platform is most compared with Talend Open Studio, Talend Data Fabric, SAP Data Services, Collibra Catalog and SSIS, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration. See our Talend Data Management Platform vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
