SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Virsec Security Platform comparison

Sonar and Virsec Systems are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Virsec Systems is ranked #34 with an average rating of 7.0. Sonar holds a 22.7% mindshare in AS, compared to Virsec Systems’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Sonar users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virsec Systems users who would recommend it.

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 116 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

45,127 Views
28,881 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Virsec Security Platform

Read 1 Virsec Security Platform review

574 Views
281 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Virsec Security Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

SonarQube Server and Virsec Security Platform both aim to enhance software and application security. SonarQube Server outperforms with its extensive feature set, while Virsec Security Platform is attractive for its advanced security measures, appealing to those prioritizing robust security.

Features: SonarQube Server provides comprehensive code analysis, integration capabilities, and support for multiple languages, making it effective in identifying code vulnerabilities during development. Virsec Security Platform focuses on runtime protection, real-time application defense, and memory protection against sophisticated exploits. The primary difference is SonarQube’s concentration on development phase security versus Virsec’s focus on real-time application protection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube Server is known for its straightforward integration process suitable for development environments. Virsec Security Platform requires a more complex deployment given its intricate security features. Customer service for SonarQube is responsive for smooth setup, whereas Virsec offers comprehensive support tailored to deploying advanced security solutions and addressing complex deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube Server offers a cost-effective solution with favorable ROI due to its affordability and development-focused features. Virsec Security Platform, despite higher upfront costs, delivers significant ROI through superior application protection capabilities. The contrasting elements lie in SonarQube’s cost-efficiency for code analysis and Virsec’s perception as a long-term security investment value.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,289 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

116

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Virsec Security Platform

Ranking in Application Security Tools

34th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (56th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 22.7%, down from 26.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virsec Security Platform is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Sthembiso Zondi

Head of Software Engineering at ronaldmariah@gmail.com

Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support

The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.

Read full review

KevinMcCarthy

Security Manager at Klearnow

Helps with Zero-day protection

We use the solution for Zero-day protection. The solution stops any kind of remote code execution. The tool's dashboard needs to load since it is not responsive and takes time to load. I have been using the product for a year. I would rate the tool's stability a six out of ten. I would…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Improve the code coverage and evaluates the technical steps and percentage of code being resolved."

"SonarQube is designed well making it easy to use, simple to identify issues and find solutions to problems."

"The customizable dashboard and ability to include results and coverage from unit test and other static analysis code tools."

"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, easy to access, and they provide good training files."

"SonarQube is scalable. My company has 50 users."

"This has improved our organization because it has helped to find Security Vulnerabilities."

"Engineers have also learned from the results and have improved themselves as engineers. This will help them with their careers."

"The initial setup is simple. It requires some security, but it's simple."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

"We use the solution for Zero-day protection."

Cons

"SonarQube needs to improve its ease of use, integration with third-party platforms, and scalability."

"In terms of analysis and findings, other tools provide more in-depth insights and detailed steps to mitigate or handle issues."

"There needs to be a shareable reporting piece or something we can click and generate easily."

"If the product could assist us with fixing issues by giving us more pointers then it would help to resolve more of the warnings without such a commitment in terms of time."

"The time it took for me to do the whole process was approximately two hours because I had to download, read the documentation, and do the configurations."

"The BPM language is important and should be considered in SonarQube."

"You may need to purchase add-ons to get the useability you desire."

"Currently requires multiple tools, lacking one overall tool."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

"The tool's dashboard needs to load since it is not responsive and takes time to load."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is free."

"SonarQube is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

"Get the paid version which allows the customized dashboard and provides technical support."

"I think comparing the product to competitors it should be less expensive."

"The price of this solution is more expensive than competitors. However, it works better than competitors."

"I requested this license for one million lines of code and they accepted this."

"I use the full trial version of SonarQube."

"I am satisfied with the pricing."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,289 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Healthcare Company

24%

Manufacturing Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Virsec Security Platform?

We use the solution for Zero-day protection.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Virsec Security Platform?

I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Virsec Security Platform?

The tool's dashboard needs to load since it is not responsive and takes time to load.

See all answers

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 14% of the time

Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 6% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Virsec Security Platform

Compared 54% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Virsec Security Platform

Compared 46% of the time

More Virsec Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

June 2025

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

June 2025

Download Virsec Security Platform product report

Also Known As

Sonar

Virsec

Interactive Demo

Sonar

Demo not available

Virsec Systems

Overview

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Virsec Security Platform (VSP) is an enterprise cybersecurity solution that continuously protects application, web and host workloads against advanced cyber threats and neutralizes zero-day exploits with zero dwell time (milliseconds). The Virsec Security Platform (VSP) aligns with Zero Trust Architectural approaches and presents a portfolio of compensating security controls that automate the enforcement of runtime execution of authorized processes, scripts, libraries and dependencies that harden Windows and Linux Host OS (Operating System) server, application, and web workloads at runtime.

Virsec Systems

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Broadcom, Allstate, Department of Homeland Security

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,289 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.