SharePlex vs Upsolver comparison

Quest Software and Upsolver are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Quest Software is ranked #49, while Upsolver is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.3. Quest Software holds a 0.9% mindshare in DI, compared to Upsolver’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Upsolver users who would recommend it.

SharePlex

Read 5 SharePlex reviews

1,991 Views
1,374 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Upsolver

Read 3 Upsolver reviews

869 Views
704 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePlex

Upsolver

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

SharePlex and Upsolver provide data integration and management solutions. SharePlex has strengths in legacy system integration, while Upsolver is ideal for modern analytics due to its agile data processing capabilities.

Features: SharePlex offers reliable database replication, high availability, and scalability for enterprises. Opposing this, Upsolver effortlessly processes streaming data, integrates with data lakes, and provides real-time analytics. SharePlex supports stability for legacy systems, but Upsolver's versatility caters to modern data needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePlex follows a traditional deployment model with structured support for hybrid environments. Its technical support is tailored for enterprise customers. Upsolver's cloud-native deployment affords rapid implementation and flexibility, alongside modern support channels for real-time troubleshooting. This ease of deployment suits fast-growing tech landscapes.

Pricing and ROI: SharePlex typically incurs higher upfront setup costs, which suit businesses needing seamless legacy integration with robust replication capabilities. It presents significant ROI in such scenarios. Upsolver's pricing is flexible, supporting its cloud-based design and appealing to those seeking cost-effective scalability. It shows strong ROI for companies valuing agility and real-time analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed SharePlex vs. Upsolver Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SharePlex vs. Upsolver

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

49th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Upsolver

Ranking in Data Integration

39th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Streaming Analytics (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of SharePlex is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Upsolver is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Upsolver	0.7%
SharePlex	0.9%
Other	98.4%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Kristopher Wells

Oracle DBA at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially

I would rate SharePlex's high availability, and disaster recovery features highly. It works as advertised in terms of rapid fill-over and switch-over opportunities. It reduces the migration time for a multi-terabyte database to an hour or less because it performs real-time replication. SharePlex reduces downtime and migration time exponentially. Something that could take 12 to 24 hours is cut down to one to two hours. By the time you start to migrate, the only remaining replication is a slight difference in data from the point when SharePlex has shut down, and the application has to also switch over to the new database. It allowed the company to replicate data more transparently. Some of the business executives probably don't even know it's there. It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems. It provides what is needed. There's little concern about whether or not it functions. It's allowed the company to achieve its objectives with its clients, reducing and minimizing downtime for substantial migrations and upgrades. It can reduce hardware and storage costs, but my company doesn't utilize it with high-availability architecture.

Read full review

reviewer2784462

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Streaming pipelines have become simpler and onboarding new data sources is now much faster

One of the best features Upsolver offers is the automatic schema evolution. Another good feature is SQL-based streaming transformations. Complex streaming transformations such as cleansing, deduplication, and enrichment were implemented using SQL and drastically reduced the need for custom Spark code. My experience with the SQL-based streaming transformations in Upsolver is that it had a significant positive impact on the overall data engineering workflow. By replacing custom Spark streaming jobs with declarative SQL logic, I simplified development, review, and deployment processes. Data transformations such as parsing, filtering, enrichment, and deduplication could be implemented and modified quickly without rebuilding or redeploying complex code-based pipelines. Upsolver has impacted my organization positively because it brings many benefits. The first one is faster onboarding of new data sources. Another one is more reliable streaming pipelines. Another one is near-real-time data availability, which is very important for us. It also reduced operational effort for data engineering teams. A specific outcome that highlights these benefits is that the time to onboard new sources is reduced from weeks to days. Custom Spark code reduction reached 50 to 40 percent. Pipeline failures are reduced by 70 to 80 percent. Data latency is improved from hours to minutes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The synchronization, data backup, and data transfer are all valuable features of the solution."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

"The core replication and its performance, which is by far the fastest, along with the way it handles replication to multiple targets with basic filtering and from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"Try it out in your production and you won't be disappointed."

"SharePlex has been a good fit for us because it was not as expensive compared to GoldenGate, it was stable compared to AWS DMS, and it was a good product for what we were looking for and within our budget too."

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

More SharePlex pros

"The most prominent feature of Upsolver is its function as an ETL tool, allowing data to be moved across platforms and different data technologies."

"It was easy to use and set up, with a nearly no-code interface that relied mostly on drag-and-drop functionality."

"A specific outcome that highlights these benefits is that the time to onboard new sources is reduced from weeks to days, custom Spark code reduction reached 50 to 40 percent, pipeline failures are reduced by 70 to 80 percent, and data latency is improved from hours to minutes."

"Customer service is excellent, and I would rate it between eight point five to nine out of ten."

Cons

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"The reporting features need improvement."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

More SharePlex cons

"I think that Upsolver can be improved in orchestration because it is not a full orchestration tool."

"On the stability side, I would rate it seven out of ten. Using multiple cloud providers and data engineering technologies creates complexity, and managing different plugins is not always easy, but they are working on it."

"There is room for improvement in query tuning."

"Upsolver excels in ETL and data aggregation, while ThoughtSpot is strong in natural language processing for querying datasets. Combining these tools can be very effective: Upsolver handles aggregation and ETL, and ThoughtSpot allows for natural language queries. There’s potential for highlighting these integrations in the future."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

"Upsolver is affordable at approximately $225 per terabyte per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Upsolver?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was a very good experience, but it is not a direct experience because it was not my responsibility. It was in charge of the customer. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Upsolver?

I think that Upsolver can be improved in orchestration because it is not a full orchestration tool. I believe it could be better in this regard. The cost needs attention at a very large scale. I th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Upsolver?

My main use case for Upsolver is during an IT consulting project for a large enterprise running a cloud-native data platform on AWS. I used Upsolver to ingest and process high-volume stream data fr...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle GoldenGate vs SharePlex

Compared 13% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex

Compared 8% of the time

SSIS vs SharePlex

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

More SharePlex Competitors

Databricks vs Upsolver

Compared 12% of the time

SAS Access vs Upsolver

Compared 9% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs Upsolver

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs Upsolver

Compared 8% of the time

Striim vs Upsolver

Compared 8% of the time

More Upsolver Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SharePlex

March 2026

Download SharePlex product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2026

Download Upsolver product report

Also Known As

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

No data available

Overview

SharePlex delivers robust database replication and migration capabilities, emphasizing performance, synchronization, and data integrity management. Supporting high availability and real-time data syncing, it serves organizations handling vast transaction volumes, especially in IoT data processing.

SharePlex offers reliable data transfer and efficient multi-target replication. Its features like Compare and Repair utilities assist in maintaining data consistency. With PEP fostering scalability for large transactions, it caters to businesses aiming to cut down migration windows and minimize outages. Users employ SharePlex in real-time syncing and failover scenarios across data centers, crucial for handling extensive transaction data during migrations or upgrades.

What are SharePlex's key features?

Core Replication: Ensures reliable data synchronization across multiple targets.
Data Integrity Management: Maintains accuracy during reading and writing processes.
Compare and Repair Utilities: Facilitate data consistency checks and fixes.
PEP: Enhances performance for large transaction volumes.

Why consider SharePlex for your database needs?

Scalability: Supports large-scale transactions with efficiency.
Minimized Downtime: Provides continuous data availability during operations.
Business Continuity: Enables seamless failover and data center transitions.
Real-time Syncing: Supports time-sensitive data processing requirements.

Organizations in sectors like finance and telecommunications implement SharePlex to maintain uninterrupted operations and ensure quick recovery times. By facilitating database migrations to cloud platforms like AWS, they achieve reduced downtime and enhanced operational efficiency, catering to the rigorous demands of data-driven industries.

Quest Software

Upsolver's mission is to turn engineering-intensive data lakes into easy-to-use repositories that serve 50X more data professionals compared to the status-quo today. Upsolver cuts 95% from the tedious process of preparing event data for analytics and machine learning, using a visual SQL-based interface, a cloud-native data platform and deep technology for stream-processing, indexing and eventually-consistent file systems.

Upsolver

Sample Customers

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

SharePlex vs. Upsolver

March 2026

Free Report: SharePlex vs. Upsolver

Find out what your peers are saying about SharePlex vs. Upsolver and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SharePlex vs. Upsolver report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.