We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why
  • Home
  • Sentinel Dynamic vs. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle

Sentinel Dynamic vs Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
Veracode
Read 24 Veracode reviews.
60,232 views|33,073 comparisons
Sentinel Dynamic Logo
Sentinel Dynamic
1,616 views|1,337 comparisons
Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle Logo
Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle
Read 17 Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle reviews.
23,885 views|13,468 comparisons
Featured Review
Riley Black
Researched Sentinel Dynamic but chose Veracode: Increased productivity, helped build and improve security and development departmental relationships
Veracode has improved our Application Security program by providing numerous integrations and tools to take our AppSec/DevSecOps to the next level.... Read more →
Use Sentinel Dynamic? Share your opinion.
Andy Cox
Helps our developers be aware of duplicate components in their code, but .NET open-source licensing recognition needs...
The solution has improved the way our company functions in terms of the way that developers think about the components that are being built into... Read more →
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: January 2022.
Download now
564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization."
  • "I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good."
  • "Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing."
  • "If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount."
  • "Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive."
  • "We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive."
  • "The pricing is really fair compared to a lot of other tools on the market."
  • "It is very reasonably priced compared to what we were paying our previous vendor. For the same price, we are getting much more value and reducing our AppSec costs from 40 to 50 percent."

    • More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "The license fee may be a bit harder for startups to justify. But it will save you a headache later as well as peace of mind. Additionally, it shows your own customers that you value security stuff and will protect yourselves from any licensing issues, which is good marketing too."
  • "In addition to the license fee for IQ Server, you have to factor in some running costs. We use AWS, so we spun up an additional VM to run this. If the database is RDS that adds a little bit extra too. Of course someone could run it on a pre-existing VM or physical server to reduce costs. I should add that compared to the license fee, the running costs are so minimal they had no effect on our decision to use IQ Server."
  • "Pricing is decent. It's not horrible. It's middle-of-the-road, as far as our ranking goes. They're a little bit more but that's also because they provide more."
  • "Lifecycle, to the best of my recollection, had the best pricing compared with other solutions."
  • "Cost is a drawback. It's somewhat costly."
  • "It's expensive, but you get what you pay for. There were no problems with the base license and how they do it. It was transparent. You don't have to worry. You can scan to your heart's delight."
  • "Given the number of users we have, it is one of the most expensive tools in our portfolio, which includes some real heavy-duty tools such as GitLab, Jira, etc. It is definitely a bit on the expensive side, and the ambiguity in how the licenses are calculated adds to the cost as well. If there is a better understanding of how the licenses are being calculated, there would be a better agreement between the two parties, and the cost might also be a little less. There is no extra cost from Sonatype. There is an operational cost on the BT side in terms of resources, etc."
  • "There are additional costs in commercial offerings for add-ons such as Nexus Container or IDE Advanced Toolkit. They come with additional fees or licenses."

    • More Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
    Top Answer: 
    SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What do you like most about Veracode?
    Top Answer: 
    There is a single area on the dashboard where you can get a full view of all of the tests and the results from… more »
    Read all 61 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode?
    Top Answer: 
    I was impressed with the pricing we got from Veracode. I was able to make it work very well within our budget.
    Read all 39 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    How does Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle compare with SonarQube?
    Top Answer: 
    We like the data that Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle consistently delivers. This solution helps us in fixing and understanding… more »
    What do you like most about Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle?
    Top Answer: 
    The quality or the profiles that you can set are most valuable. The remediation of issues that you can do and how the… more »
    Read all 20 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle?
    Top Answer: 
    There are additional costs in commercial offerings for add-ons such as Nexus Container or IDE Advanced Toolkit. They… more »
    Read all 15 answers   →
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WhiteHat Security Application Security Testing
    Nexus Lifecycle
    Learn More
    Veracode
    NTT Application Security
    Sonatype
    Overview

    Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

    WhiteHat Sentinel delivers a proven, scalable, and affordable enterprise application security platform, accelerating the identification and remediation of Web application security vulnerabilities

    Nexus Lifecycle gives you full control over your software supply chain and allows you to define rules, actions, and policies that work best for your organization and teams.

    Offer
    Keep your software secure
    Find out more

    Application security starts with secure code. Find out more about the benefits of using Veracode to keep your software secure throughout the development lifecycle.

    Learn more about Sentinel Dynamic
    Learn More
    Learn more about Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    State of Missouri, Rekner
    StreetCred Software, ReachLocal
    Genome.One, Blackboard, Crediterform, Crosskey, Intuit, Progress Software, Qualys, Liberty Mutual Insurance
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company9%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Insurance Company17%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise51%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise44%
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: January 2022.
    Download now
    564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Sentinel Dynamic is ranked 27th in Application Security while Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is ranked 3rd in Application Security with 17 reviews. Sentinel Dynamic is rated 0.0, while Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle writes "Checks our libraries for security and licensing issues". Sentinel Dynamic is most compared with SonarQube, OWASP Zap, WhiteSource, Qualys Web Application Scanning and Checkmarx, whereas Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is most compared with SonarQube, WhiteSource, Black Duck, JFrog Xray and GitLab.

    See our list of best Application Security vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.