SAS Access vs SharePlex comparison

SAS and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. SAS is ranked #59, while Quest Software is ranked #47. SAS holds a 0.8% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SAS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

SAS Access

Read 3 SAS Access reviews

1,587 Views
1,238 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePlex

Read 5 SharePlex reviews

2,878 Views
1,871 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAS Access

SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

SAS Access and SharePlex compete in the data integration and management sector. SharePlex holds an upper hand due to its real-time data replication and performance optimization features, coupled with a streamlined deployment process.

Features: SAS Access provides extensive data connectivity, effective data manipulation, and access to a wide range of databases. SharePlex offers real-time data replication, high availability features, and performance optimization, making it a highly efficient solution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Access benefits from established customer service channels for reliable support. SharePlex provides a straightforward installation process with strong technical support, ensuring a more user-friendly deployment experience.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Access involves higher setup costs as a long-term investment with comprehensive features. SharePlex offers competitive pricing with strong ROI due to efficient replication capabilities and lower operational costs, making it more cost-effective long-term.

To learn more, read our detailed SAS Access vs. SharePlex Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SAS Access vs. SharePlex

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAS Access

Ranking in Data Integration

59th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

47th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of SAS Access is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePlex is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SharePlex	1.1%
SAS Access	0.8%
Other	98.1%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Robert Heck

Co Owner at Hecht und Heck GmbH

The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible

I rate the solution eight out of ten. The number of people required to maintain the solution is dependent on the other applications running. The solution in itself does not require a lot of maintenance. The solution is flexible and I recommend it when you have more complex applications with special requirements.

Read full review

Kristopher Wells

Oracle DBA at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially

I would rate SharePlex's high availability, and disaster recovery features highly. It works as advertised in terms of rapid fill-over and switch-over opportunities. It reduces the migration time for a multi-terabyte database to an hour or less because it performs real-time replication. SharePlex reduces downtime and migration time exponentially. Something that could take 12 to 24 hours is cut down to one to two hours. By the time you start to migrate, the only remaining replication is a slight difference in data from the point when SharePlex has shut down, and the application has to also switch over to the new database. It allowed the company to replicate data more transparently. Some of the business executives probably don't even know it's there. It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems. It provides what is needed. There's little concern about whether or not it functions. It's allowed the company to achieve its objectives with its clients, reducing and minimizing downtime for substantial migrations and upgrades. It can reduce hardware and storage costs, but my company doesn't utilize it with high-availability architecture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The SAS/ACCESS ability to connect creates an elegant simplicity."

"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."

"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."

"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."

"SharePlex has been a good fit for us because it was not as expensive compared to GoldenGate, it was stable compared to AWS DMS, and it was a good product for what we were looking for and within our budget too."

"Try it out in your production and you won't be disappointed."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"The synchronization, data backup, and data transfer are all valuable features of the solution."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

"The core replication and its performance, which is by far the fastest, along with the way it handles replication to multiple targets with basic filtering and from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

More SharePlex pros

Cons

"The primary way that this product can be improved is by adjusting their pricing model."

"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."

"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication."

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

More SharePlex cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Access

Compared 8% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs SAS Access

Compared 8% of the time

Toad Data Point vs SAS Access

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Business Data Cloud vs SAS Access

Compared 7% of the time

Upsolver vs SAS Access

Compared 7% of the time

More SAS Access Competitors

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SharePlex

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex

Compared 5% of the time

More SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

May 2026

Download SAS Access product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePlex

April 2026

Download SharePlex product report

Also Known As

SAS/Access

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Overview

SAS Access connects users to data across platforms, enabling insights and analytics. It provides seamless access and integration for data processing and management, bridging the gap between extensive datasets and analytics capabilities.

SAS Access offers robust features that facilitate data access and integration, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking to manage, manipulate, and analyze data spread across different storage systems. Users benefit from its ability to deliver comprehensive data access, enhancing efficiency and productivity. By reducing complexities in accessing distant or disparate data, SAS Access stands as a versatile tool for businesses that want to overcome data silos and drive analytics innovation.

What Are the Valuable Features of SAS Access?

Scalability: Efficient handling of large-scale data allows organizations to grow without data processing bottlenecks.
Compatibility: Offers compatibility with a wide range of data sources, including databases and third-party applications, facilitating seamless data integration.
Security: Ensures robust data security protocols to protect sensitive data and maintain compliance with industry standards.

What Benefits Should Be Considered in Reviews?

Improved Decision-Making: Access to diverse data sources bolsters decision-making with comprehensive insights.
Time Savings: Streamlined data access reduces time spent on data preparation, accelerating project timelines.
Cost Efficiency: Efficient data processing reduces infrastructure costs and optimizes resource usage.

In finance, SAS Access is used to streamline data reporting and analysis, providing essential insights for risk management. Retailers use it to merge customer data from disparate sources, enabling personalized marketing. Healthcare organizations utilize it to integrate patient data securely, improving care delivery and outcomes.

SAS

SharePlex delivers robust database replication and migration capabilities, emphasizing performance, synchronization, and data integrity management. Supporting high availability and real-time data syncing, it serves organizations handling vast transaction volumes, especially in IoT data processing.

SharePlex offers reliable data transfer and efficient multi-target replication. Its features like Compare and Repair utilities assist in maintaining data consistency. With PEP fostering scalability for large transactions, it caters to businesses aiming to cut down migration windows and minimize outages. Users employ SharePlex in real-time syncing and failover scenarios across data centers, crucial for handling extensive transaction data during migrations or upgrades.

What are SharePlex's key features?

Core Replication: Ensures reliable data synchronization across multiple targets.
Data Integrity Management: Maintains accuracy during reading and writing processes.
Compare and Repair Utilities: Facilitate data consistency checks and fixes.
PEP: Enhances performance for large transaction volumes.

Why consider SharePlex for your database needs?

Scalability: Supports large-scale transactions with efficiency.
Minimized Downtime: Provides continuous data availability during operations.
Business Continuity: Enables seamless failover and data center transitions.
Real-time Syncing: Supports time-sensitive data processing requirements.

Organizations in sectors like finance and telecommunications implement SharePlex to maintain uninterrupted operations and ensure quick recovery times. By facilitating database migrations to cloud platforms like AWS, they achieve reduced downtime and enhanced operational efficiency, catering to the rigorous demands of data-driven industries.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Buyer's Guide

SAS Access vs. SharePlex

May 2026

Free Report: SAS Access vs. SharePlex

Find out what your peers are saying about SAS Access vs. SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAS Access vs. SharePlex report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.