SAS Access vs SharePlex comparison

SAS and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. SAS is ranked #63, while Quest Software is ranked #47. SAS holds a 0.6% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SAS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

SAS Access

Read 3 SAS Access reviews

792 Views
602 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePlex

Read 5 SharePlex reviews

1,777 Views
1,226 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAS Access

SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

SAS Access and SharePlex compete in the data management and integration market, offering different focal capabilities. SAS Access appears to have the upper hand in data connectivity due to its broad adaptability to various data sources, while SharePlex stands out in data replication because of its robust replication tools and high availability for database management.

Features: SAS Access provides seamless data integration across diverse platforms, ease of use with comprehensive integration capabilities, and broad data source compatibility. SharePlex offers reliable data movement, exceptional database replication features, and high-performance data management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Access benefits from straightforward installation and comprehensive support resources designed for users needing quick data access solutions. SharePlex offers advanced deployment functionalities, focusing on large-scale replication needs with robust documentation and a dedicated support system to effectively address customer requirements.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Access features a lower initial setup cost making it attractive for businesses on limited budgets. SharePlex provides higher ROI over time through strategic emphasis on data replication and operational cost savings. While SAS Access is cost-effective, SharePlex proves beneficial for long-term data management and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed SAS Access vs. SharePlex Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SAS Access vs. SharePlex

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAS Access

Ranking in Data Integration

63rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

47th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of SAS Access is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePlex is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SharePlex	0.9%
SAS Access	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Robert Heck

Co Owner at Hecht und Heck GmbH

The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible

I rate the solution eight out of ten. The number of people required to maintain the solution is dependent on the other applications running. The solution in itself does not require a lot of maintenance. The solution is flexible and I recommend it when you have more complex applications with special requirements.

Read full review

Kristopher Wells

Oracle DBA at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially

I would rate SharePlex's high availability, and disaster recovery features highly. It works as advertised in terms of rapid fill-over and switch-over opportunities. It reduces the migration time for a multi-terabyte database to an hour or less because it performs real-time replication. SharePlex reduces downtime and migration time exponentially. Something that could take 12 to 24 hours is cut down to one to two hours. By the time you start to migrate, the only remaining replication is a slight difference in data from the point when SharePlex has shut down, and the application has to also switch over to the new database. It allowed the company to replicate data more transparently. Some of the business executives probably don't even know it's there. It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems. It provides what is needed. There's little concern about whether or not it functions. It's allowed the company to achieve its objectives with its clients, reducing and minimizing downtime for substantial migrations and upgrades. It can reduce hardware and storage costs, but my company doesn't utilize it with high-availability architecture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."

"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

Cons

"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."

"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."

"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Qlik Talend Cloud vs SAS Access

Compared 14% of the time

Teradata vs SAS Access

Compared 14% of the time

SAP Analytics Hub vs SAS Access

Compared 14% of the time

Talend Data Fabric vs SAS Access

Compared 14% of the time

Toad Data Point vs SAS Access

Compared 13% of the time

More SAS Access Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs SharePlex

Compared 33% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs SharePlex

Compared 11% of the time

Fivetran vs SharePlex

Compared 10% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SharePlex

Compared 9% of the time

More SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

January 2026

Download SAS Access product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePlex

January 2026

Download SharePlex product report

Also Known As

SAS/Access

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Overview

SAS/ACCESS is an out-of-the-box solution for integrating SAS and third-party databases. You can read, write and update data regardless of the database or platform. Because the data appears native to SAS, there is no need to learn Structured Query Language (SQL) or any other database-specific query languages.

SAS

SharePlex delivers robust database replication and migration capabilities, emphasizing performance, synchronization, and data integrity management. Supporting high availability and real-time data syncing, it serves organizations handling vast transaction volumes, especially in IoT data processing.

SharePlex offers reliable data transfer and efficient multi-target replication. Its features like Compare and Repair utilities assist in maintaining data consistency. With PEP fostering scalability for large transactions, it caters to businesses aiming to cut down migration windows and minimize outages. Users employ SharePlex in real-time syncing and failover scenarios across data centers, crucial for handling extensive transaction data during migrations or upgrades.

What are SharePlex's key features?

Core Replication: Ensures reliable data synchronization across multiple targets.
Data Integrity Management: Maintains accuracy during reading and writing processes.
Compare and Repair Utilities: Facilitate data consistency checks and fixes.
PEP: Enhances performance for large transaction volumes.

Why consider SharePlex for your database needs?

Scalability: Supports large-scale transactions with efficiency.
Minimized Downtime: Provides continuous data availability during operations.
Business Continuity: Enables seamless failover and data center transitions.
Real-time Syncing: Supports time-sensitive data processing requirements.

Organizations in sectors like finance and telecommunications implement SharePlex to maintain uninterrupted operations and ensure quick recovery times. By facilitating database migrations to cloud platforms like AWS, they achieve reduced downtime and enhanced operational efficiency, catering to the rigorous demands of data-driven industries.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Buyer's Guide

SAS Access vs. SharePlex

January 2026

Free Report: SAS Access vs. SharePlex

Find out what your peers are saying about SAS Access vs. SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAS Access vs. SharePlex report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.