SAP Integration Suite vs webMethods.io comparison

SAP and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. SAP is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.7. SAP holds a 1.3% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

SAP Integration Suite

Read 7 SAP Integration Suite reviews

1,086 Views
1,086 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 94 webMethods.io reviews

8,762 Views
2,541 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

SAP Integration Suite

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

webMethods.io and SAP Integration Suite compete in the integration platform market. SAP Integration Suite has the upper hand with its comprehensive features and seamless SAP application integration, while webMethods.io offers better pricing and support options.

Features: webMethods.io includes hybrid integration, API management, and B2B connectivity, providing flexibility. SAP Integration Suite is highly regarded for seamless SAP application integration, pre-built integrations, and a vast partner ecosystem.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io offers a straightforward deployment model and strong customer service, enhancing the deployment experience. SAP Integration Suite provides comprehensive guidance and support, assuring successful implementation despite a more complex deployment model.

Pricing and ROI: webMethods.io is attractive for setup costs, focusing on competitive pricing strategies for strong ROI. SAP Integration Suite, with potentially higher setup costs, delivers excellent ROI for SAP-focused organizations, justifying the expense through its extensive features and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Integration Suite vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Integration Suite vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Integration Suite

Ranking in API Management

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), Cloud Data Integration (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of SAP Integration Suite is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	2.5%
SAP Integration Suite	1.3%
Other	96.2%

API Management

Featured Reviews

AhilaKelam

Application Development Senior Analyst at Accenture

Integration work has streamlined cross-application automation and supports faster development

Regarding how SAP Integration Suite can be improved, we have something called pre-packaged content, such as standard flows or inbuilt adapters. If we had something called Groovy script for most of the scenarios, it would be very useful. We have some standard scripts for the basic scenarios, such as payload logging, that are frequently usable. For such things, if we had the pre-built scripts, it would be very easy for the developers to reuse them in very common scenarios or requirements and make the work very fast. That would be really helpful for the developers. Regarding additional features for SAP Integration Suite, I think it is good as of now and nothing much needs to be improved because we can see all the expected features. We have the open connectors, cloud connectors, API management, and everything is there. We have the Integration Advisor, and I feel it is good. The only thing I was expecting is pre-built scripts, Groovy scripts, which would be helpful for the developers to speed up the work. Since coding is not manual and we are getting it from ChatGPT and it is all AI, if that is integrated into the tool, it would be very nice and easy for the developers.

Read full review

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers strong integration capabilities and reliable features but needs pricing and scaling improvements

Many things are evolving with the AI buzz in the market. What I would like to see improved or enhanced in webMethods.io in the future is that since webMethods.io is already under IBM, I think IBM will introduce and integrate AI into it. Additionally, regarding what webMethods.io can improve is the license cost. Other cloud players are also providing the same kind of functionality, such as AWS and Azure. webMethods.io is being installed on-premises, but AWS is providing it directly in the cloud. When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that. There are many competitors in the market for this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support services are good."

"The SAP Integration Suite can work with different authentication methods. It supports physical authentication, certificate-based integration, and mTLS authentication. This allows customers to choose the best integration approach based on their policies and procedures. Additionally, the suite offers both push and data integration capabilities."

"The features in SAP Integration Suite, such as the API management and the feasibility to connect with the on-premise systems using the Cloud Connector configuration in BTP Cockpit, are very flexible to work with."

"SAP Integration Suite's event-driven architecture has helped automate processes by providing better scalability, performance, and organization compared to point-to-point methods."

"The most beneficial feature of SAP Integration Suite for our operation is its capability to enable API-based cloud applications to integrate seamlessly with SAP S/4HANA."

"The most beneficial feature for our clients is the easy access to their information, achieved effortlessly through integration."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The solution is scalable."

"The cloud version of the solution is very easy to set up."

"The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."

"webMethods.io is a comprehensive box that provides multiple functionalities; I appreciate it because we can integrate many applications and any kind of API we want to integrate."

"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."

"The developer portal is a valuable feature."

"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."

"We have found the pricing of the solution to be fair."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"I believe there are areas where SAP Integration Suite could be improved, such as enhancing message transformation capabilities and simplifying conditional routing features compared to the on-premise tool SAP PO (Process Orchestration)."

"The setup process for the SAP integration Suite is not straightforward. It involves some technical aspects and can be complex."

"I have faced a few issues with the CPI Helper, which is an extension I was using to enable the trace and check the step-by-step flow and simulation inputs and outputs."

"The product's UI could be faster."

"In PIPO, there were complex and effective tools to measure performance and how messages were processed, but Integration Suite still does not have solid reports that are useful for evaluating and understanding possible bottlenecks."

"The instances are costly."

"They could provide graphical data for over-viewing metrics such as payments, receipts, creditors, and refunds."

"webMethods Integration Server could improve on the version control. I'm not sure if Web Method has some kind of inbuilt integration with Bitbucket or GitHub or some kind of version control system. However, that's one area where they can improve."

"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."

"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."

"Version control is not very easy. The packages and the integration server are on Eclipse IDE, but you can't compare the code from the IDE. For example, if you are working on Java code, doing version control and deployment for a quick comparison between the code isn't easy. Some tools or plug-ins are there, such as CrossVista, and you can also play with an SVN server where you have to place your package, and from there, you can check, but you have to do that as a separate exercise. You can't do it from the IDE or webMethods server. You can't just right-click and upload your service."

"The deployment should be simplified."

"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."

"Support is expensive."

"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is inexpensive for smaller businesses and expensive for larger businesses."

"I'm not well-versed in the details of pricing and standard licensing for SAP Integration Suite as I primarily focus on technical aspects. As far as I know, clients can choose between different levels of offerings based on their messaging frequency and business requirements, with premium levels offering more features and customization options."

"I rate its pricing a five out of ten."

"Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"It is worth the cost."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP Integration Suite?

The SAP Integration Suite can work with different authentication methods. It supports physical authentication, certificate-based integration, and mTLS authentication. This allows customers to choos...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Integration Suite?

I'm not well-versed in the details of pricing and standard licensing for SAP Integration Suite as I primarily focus on technical aspects. As far as I know, clients can choose between different leve...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Integration Suite?

Areas that could be improved with SAP Integration Suite include tools for monitoring and separated error analysis. Some reports contain everything, leading to difficulty in finding particular messa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs SAP Integration Suite

Compared 30% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs SAP Integration Suite

Compared 19% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs SAP Integration Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Apigee vs SAP Integration Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Integration Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Integration Suite Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP Integration Suite

January 2026

Download SAP Integration Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

January 2026

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

SAP Integration Suite is a comprehensive integration platform that facilitates seamless connectivity between applications and data sources, enabling businesses to streamline processes and enhance operational efficiency.

SAP Integration Suite empowers businesses to address complex IT landscapes by providing tools for connecting cloud and on-premises applications. Its robust framework supports API management, data integration, and process automation, offering flexibility and scalability to meet dynamic business demands.

What are the key features of SAP Integration Suite?

API Management: Offers comprehensive APIs to standardize interactions between different applications.
Data Integration: Allows secure and efficient data transfer across systems.
Cloud Integration: Facilitates seamless connectivity between cloud-based solutions.
Process Automation: Enables automation of workflows for increased efficiency.
Monitoring and Analytics: Provides insights into performance and processes.

What benefits should you look for in SAP Integration Suite reviews?

Scalability: Grows with the business and supports expanding workloads.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing technologies and business models.
Efficiency: Reduces manual processes and enhances workflow integration.
Robust Security: Ensures data transfer is secure and compliant.

SAP Integration Suite is widely implemented across industries like finance, manufacturing, and retail, where it enhances operational efficiency and fosters innovation. Its ability to integrate diverse systems allows these sectors to improve data consistency and regulatory compliance, promoting streamlined operations and better decision-making.

SAP

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

SAP Integration Suite vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Free Report: SAP Integration Suite vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Integration Suite vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Integration Suite vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.