Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Sahi Pro vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Sahi Pro
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
20th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Selenium HQ
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
112
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Regression Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Sahi Pro is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Selenium HQ is 5.6%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Regression Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Vipul Saxena - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to deploy, good technical support, and stable
Sahi Pro can improve the transformation process. Suppose we are working in Python and we want to view our code in Python. If the conversion is available, it would be much easier for the user to support Python users, making it a better tool if it can be converted into different languages including Java Script.
Sujata Sujata Ghadage - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation in testing processes sees improvement with multi-browser support and easier website interactions
Selenium HQ could improve by including a robust reporting framework, eliminating the need for external frameworks. The tool could simplify object identification, enabling users to generate XPaths without requiring detailed DOM understanding. Additionally, an automatic update mechanism for Selenium HQ would be beneficial, eliminating the need for manual downloads and updates of browser drivers when new versions are released.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"There are many features that are very easy to use, such as the identification of commands."
"The tool is easy to use and log in with respect to other tools. It is open-source. We can customize the product. I also like its security."
"The ability to present your tests on a wiki page and hooking them up to the scripts/fixtures."
"The solution is very flexible; there are different ways of using it. It's open-source and has a lot of support on offer."
"Ability to integrate with every other tool."
"The stability of the solution has been good, it is reliable we have not had any bugs."
"The most valuable features are the ability to test and debug."
"The solution is free to use."
"Some of the most valuable features of this solution are open-source, they have good support, good community support, and it supports multiple languages whether you use C-Sharp or not. These are some of the most important benefits."
 

Cons

"Sahi Pro can improve the transformation process."
"It would be very great if Selenium would provide some framework examples so newcomers could get started more quickly."
"The solution could be improved regarding communication with browsers, as it is slower and a bit tricky compared to other frameworks. However, with the latest changes involving BiDirectional communication, it is becoming a top choice in automation frameworks."
"Selenium HQ doesn't support Windows-based applications, so we need to integrate with the third-party vendor. It would be great if Selenium could include Windows-based automation. You need to integrate it with a third-party tool if you want to upload any files. When we interact with a Windows application, we usually use Tosca."
"There are some synchronization issues"
"The installation could be simplified, it is a bit difficult to install."
"When we upgrade the version, some features are missing. I want the product to include some AI capabilities."
"It would be awesome if there was a standalone implementation of Selenium for non-developer users."
"Selenium uses a layer-based approach that is somewhat slower than Eggplant when it comes to executing code."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Sahi Pro is priced well."
"Selenium HQ is a free solution."
"Selenium is open-source, so there are no setup costs associated with it."
"It is an open-source product, it is free for anyone to use."
"It is an open-source solution."
"The solution is open-source, so it is 100% free with no hidden charges."
"Selenium is open-source."
"The product is open-source and free."
"Selenium HQ is a free, open-source solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?
Selenium is easy to install and mostly free, so there's no need for a license. This lack of costs makes it an attractive option.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
SeleniumHQ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, OpenText and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: April 2025.
851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.