RHEV vs Spot comparison

Red Hat and Spot are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Red Hat is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8, while Spot is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0. Red Hat holds a 3.4% mindshare in SVS, compared to Spot’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 79% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spot users who would recommend it.

RHEV

Read 36 RHEV reviews

4,043 Views
4,043 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Spot

Read 2 Spot reviews

1,121 Views
34 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

RHEV

Spot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

RHEV and Spot compete in cloud infrastructure management. Spot seems to have the upper hand with its advanced features and superior resource management capabilities, offering flexibility and scalability that are advantageous for businesses seeking dynamic solutions.

Features: RHEV offers virtualization efficiency, security integration, and cost competitiveness, making it suitable for enterprises with a focus on secure and budget-conscious solutions. Spot provides scalability, dynamic resource allocation, and advanced workload adaptability, facilitating optimal resource utilization and flexibility in cloud management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spot simplifies deployment with comprehensive documentation and proactive customer support that accelerates the setup process. RHEV follows a traditional deployment approach that might demand more time and resources for configuration. Spot's focus on customer guidance ensures quicker operational readiness.

Pricing and ROI: RHEV's pricing is economical, appealing to organizations with budget constraints looking for cost-effective solutions. Spot, though more expensive, offers higher ROI due to automation and advanced resource management, which can reduce operational costs over time, making it a worthy investment for maximizing returns despite its higher initial cost.

To learn more, read our detailed RHEV vs. Spot Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

RHEV vs. Spot

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

RHEV

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spot

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (32nd), Cloud Operations Analytics (1st), Cloud Analytics (5th), Compute Service (11th), Containers as a Service (CaaS) (6th), Cloud Cost Management (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of RHEV is 3.4%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spot is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Virtualization Software

Featured Reviews

Sujeet-Kumar

Project Manager Cloud Infrastructure at Path Infotech ltd

The solution is scalable and affordable, but it lacks features, and it is not easy to manage

Management of RHEV is not as easy as VMware. Some features do not work. The product does not provide features similar to VMware’s VMotion. After creating the cluster, the VM is moved to another node if we move down. However, the VM does not move the parent node automatically. It has to be moved manually. VMware moves it automatically. RHEV moves it to the parent node only if we restart. Everything can be handled in VMware through the GUI. However, in RHEV, some things can be managed through UI, and others cannot. We have to troubleshoot and use CLI. A few features of the product do not work as well as those in VMware.

Read full review

Manpreet_Singh

Senior Principal Infrastructure Engineer at Mphasis

Used to manage Kubernetes infrastructure, but it doesn't have support from OCI

Spot Ocean is deployed on the cloud in our organization. I would recommend the solution to other users. You need to have an experience with Kubernetes, or else this product is of no use. It is not difficult to learn to use Spot Ocean. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest aspect for me is the disk usage, the virtual manager, and the deployment of machines."

"The solution makes migration easy."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The solution has a good licensing module."

"The price is the solution's most valuable aspect. It's much cheaper than, for example, VMware."

"I advise keeping an open mind. It's an excellent solution."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is the popularity of the OS."

"RHEV’s cost is much less compared to VMware."

More RHEV pros

"The solution offers both block access and file access, making it a nice solution for customers."

"The solution helps us to manage and scale automatically whenever there is a limit to the increase in the application workflow."

Cons

"This solution could be more secure."

"Specifically, enhancements in managing virtual machine migrations, cloning, and the creation of different VMs could further optimize its functionality."

"The support is tricky in a few places. We're facing some challenges within Malaysia where we don't really have the system integrators available who can provide extended support. When we need personnel on-site, we can't get them."

"We would like the dashboard feature of this solution to be improved, as it is not very detailed at present."

"While everything needs improvement in some way, I have no specifics."

"When we do a direct comparison, then obviously VMware does better in terms of having Fault Tolerance and doing active disaster recovery and these kind of things. This is something that can be improved within Red Hat."

"I heard that there are big differences between Red Hat eight and seven, but it's still quite difficult for me to judge it. I found it a bit more difficult to manage than version seven, which was much easier. In term of features, though, it is still not yet clear which is better. I have no clear idea of which features need to be changed at the moment."

"The UI should be more interactive with additional features."

More RHEV cons

"There are no particular areas for improvement I can identify."

"The solution doesn't have support from OCI, and it should start working to onboard OCI."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product has a variety of licensing options available. However, the level of licensing, and therefore the cost of licensing, is dependent on the number of servers being utilized."

"Price-wise, RHEV is okay, in my opinion."

"We buy a license for commercial use, and we also use the free editions."

"We have to pay extra for vulnerability and fault tolerance."

"It's a budget product as far as I'm concerned. It's way cheaper than any of its competitors. The only thing cheaper than Red Hat is that the people who take the Red Hat code clone it and then self-support it."

"I believe we pay on a yearly basis."

"The price of RHEV is high. It is an open-source solution, the price should be less. The price should not be on par with a solution, such as VMware. It's not more or equal to VMware, it's less, but the difference should be more substantial."

"The solution does not require licencing but a subscription is necessary, which is very affordable."

More RHEV pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Thang Le Toan (Victory Lee)

CIO at Robusta Technology & Training

Jan 13, 2015

vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer

We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about RHEV?

The initial setup is fairly straightforward and well-documented. The process is very similar to its competitors. The success of your setup depends on how well you plan.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RHEV?

It's the open source. There's not much cost. It's very minimal comparably. Compared to what I am paying for VMware, it's negligible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with RHEV?

The RHEV management plane could be improved, particularly the management interface. Something more similar to a Google, Amazon, or Azure interface might attract people to use its management interfa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spot Ocean?

The solution helps us to manage and scale automatically whenever there is a limit to the increase in the application workflow.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spot Ocean?

There are no particular areas for improvement I can identify.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spot Ocean?

Spot by NetApp is primarily used for backup and also for Fiservware.

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware vSphere vs RHEV

Compared 39% of the time

Proxmox VE vs RHEV

Compared 27% of the time

Hyper-V vs RHEV

Compared 11% of the time

KVM vs RHEV

Compared 10% of the time

Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs RHEV

Compared 7% of the time

More RHEV Competitors

ProsperOps vs Spot

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Spot

Compared 16% of the time

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs Spot

Compared 14% of the time

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs Spot

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudability vs Spot

Compared 11% of the time

More Spot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

RHEV

August 2025

Download RHEV product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Analytics

August 2025

Download Spot product report

Also Known As

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization

Spot Ocean, Spot Elastigroup, Spot Eco

Overview

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, or RHEV, is a leading open standard enterprise virtualization management solution. This solution supports virtualization of servers and desktops using the same infrastructure and a single easy-to-use interface.

Because RHEV is based on open standards, it is vendor-independent and a lot more cost effective and flexible than proprietary solutions.

Red Hat

Spot provides dynamic workload management for cloud environments, offering cost optimization and enhanced performance. It stands out with its unique approach to managing resources efficiently.

Spot is designed to enhance cloud resource utilization and cost-effectiveness through intelligent workload management. With real-time analysis, Spot determines and deploys the most efficient resources, ensuring optimal performance for applications. Businesses benefit from reduced cloud expenses and increased operational efficiency, making it an essential tool for managing cloud infrastructure effectively.

What are the key features of Spot?

Automated Scaling: Automatically adjusts cloud resources based on demand and usage patterns.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides continuous oversight to ensure optimal performance and operational efficiency.
Cost Optimization: Reduces expenses by utilizing spot instances and leveraging cost-effective cloud resources.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with existing cloud services and infrastructures.

What benefits should users look for in Spot?

Cost Reduction: Users can expect to see a significant decrease in cloud expenses.
Improved Efficiency: Enhancements in operational processes and workload management.
Resource Optimization: Better allocation and usage of cloud resources.
Scalability: Capability to handle increasing amounts of work effectively.

In finance, Spot ensures cost-effective cloud computing for trading platforms, while in e-commerce, it dynamically manages back-end processes. In the entertainment industry, Spot optimizes media streaming by deploying resources when user demand spikes. Each industry leverages Spot to maximize performance and minimize operational costs, demonstrating its versatility and reliability across sectors.

Spot

Sample Customers

Qualcomm and Bonham's Auction House.

Freshworks, Zalando, Red Spark, News, Trax, ETAS, Demandbase, BeesWa, Duolingo, intel, IBM, N26, Wix, EyeEm, moovit, SAMSUNG, News UK, ticketmaster

Buyer's Guide

RHEV vs. Spot

July 2025

Free Report: RHEV vs. Spot

Find out what your peers are saying about RHEV vs. Spot and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our RHEV vs. Spot report.

See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.