Red Canary vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Red Canary and Tenable are both solutions in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category. Red Canary is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while Tenable is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9. Additionally, 100% of Red Canary users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Tenable Vulnerability Management and Red Canary compete in the vulnerability management and security operations category. Tenable shows strength in extensive vulnerability scanning capabilities, while Red Canary leads in advanced threat detection and response.

Features: Tenable offers extensive vulnerability scanning across diverse network assets, providing in-depth security insights through detailed reports. It also facilitates a robust interface for seamless integration with existing solutions. Red Canary focuses on real-time threat intelligence and automated response playbooks, enhancing its proactive threat detection measures. Its integration with EDR solutions like CrowdStrike and Carbon Black further strengthens its security operations.

Room for Improvement: Tenable could enhance its real-time threat intelligence capabilities to match Red Canary's offerings and refine its automated response features for immediate security actions. Additionally, improvements in user interface customization could be beneficial. Red Canary may focus on reducing initial setup costs and expanding its vulnerability management to rival Tenable's comprehensive coverage. Improving integration ease with broader enterprise solutions can add further value.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable ensures a seamless deployment process with robust support for smooth system integration, catering to broader vulnerability management. It is recognized for excellent technical support and integration capabilities. Red Canary is known for quick and easy setup, with responsive support focusing on swift threat detection deployment, ensuring operational continuity and minimal disruption during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable is often viewed as cost-effective, with lower initial costs and a favorable ROI due to its extensive range of security features. Its pricing strategy is appealing for organizations looking for comprehensive solutions at a reduced cost. Red Canary tends to have higher initial costs, justified by its advanced threat detection technology. However, it offers a high ROI for companies prioritizing rapid threat response and real-time security intelligence.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at Novartis

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Sagar Shekhar

Cyber Security Analyst at TIAA

An open-source tool that offers great automation capabilities

Red Canary MDR generates a lot of output, so it would be good if, in the end, it generates a summary of all the previous attacks and what was the outcome of a single attack, especially so that it becomes easy for the user to see the summary and analyze the whole thing. In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users.

Read full review

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Streamlines vulnerability management with excellent reporting and potential AI integration

Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting. It allows me to easily fetch and schedule reports. The software's discovery feature aids in strengthening our security posture. The single-sensor installation process on various operating systems is smooth, unlike Rapid7, which requires different versions for separate systems. Furthermore, Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"I recommended Red Canary to my friends who work in other organizations."

"The near real-time review translates into near real-time action. So, in addition to alerting, Red Canary MDR has response playbooks built out."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its automation part."

"The solution works well for what we use it for and the support and protection are good."

"The valuable features of this solution are it integrates well with different EDR software, such CrowdStrike, and Carbon Black, and the information it provides is helpful."

"The tool has an easy-to-use interface."

"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."

"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"It's a recommended tool for penetration testers because it's effective for that purpose."

"The interface is fine."

"Technical support has been good. They respond quite quickly."

"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"The price could always be better."

"The most valuable feature of Red Canary MDR is the overall threat protection it provides."

"In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users."

"I would like there to be an on-premise version of this solution for our data centers because of the proliferation of online threats."

"Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions."

"They've been able to think about everything in terms of where the world is going and the type of assets that you've got. They've everything sorted out in that aspect, but you have to pay for most of the other components that they've got to give you complete visibility across your tech surface. If it already had those capabilities in-built, without having to add them on to take advantage of them, it would be a very compelling value proposition."

"It can have more integration."

"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."

"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."

"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."

"The solution must be promoted more in the market."

"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I have not compared Red Canary to other solutions to know if the price is high or low. However, I have found the price of this solution fair and reasonable, it cost approximately $100 per year, per device. If they could provide the solution for $50 per year, per device, it would be better."

"The solution could vary in price depending on how many endpoints a company has."

"Red Canary MDR I use is an open-source tool."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."

"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."

"Tenable charges around $40 per device."

"The solution is not too expensive."

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

23%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

I find that the pricing for Zafran aligns well with the comprehensive features it offers. The asset and user-based li...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

Zafran is a new startup. Features are continuously being added or improved. 1) Continued integrations with existing (...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

We connect this to our vulnerability scanner as input, our security tools to better determine risk, and our change ma...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Canary MDR?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its automation part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Canary MDR?

The services are higher priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Canary MDR?

Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions.

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io. My current client doesn't have access to it. Howeve...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 55% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 22% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 14% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Red Canary

Compared 20% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 20% of the time

Expel vs Red Canary

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Red Canary

Compared 10% of the time

Rapid7 MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Canary Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 22% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

March 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

April 2025

Download Red Canary product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

April 2025

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Tenable.io

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR) offers robust threat detection, rapid response capabilities, continuous security monitoring, and seamless integration with existing tools. Valued for its actionable reporting and proactive threat intelligence, it streamlines operations and enhances organizational efficiency and security.

Red Canary

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

DuPont, Quanta Services, Microchip Technology, Hopkins Public Schools, Henny Penny, Schumacher Homes

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

April 2025

Free Report: Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.