Red Canary vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Red Canary and Tenable are both solutions in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category. Red Canary is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0, while Tenable is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Additionally, 100% of Red Canary users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Tenable Vulnerability Management and Red Canary compete in the vulnerability management and security operations category. Tenable shows strength in extensive vulnerability scanning capabilities, while Red Canary leads in advanced threat detection and response.

Features: Tenable offers extensive vulnerability scanning across diverse network assets, providing in-depth security insights through detailed reports. It also facilitates a robust interface for seamless integration with existing solutions. Red Canary focuses on real-time threat intelligence and automated response playbooks, enhancing its proactive threat detection measures. Its integration with EDR solutions like CrowdStrike and Carbon Black further strengthens its security operations.

Room for Improvement: Tenable could enhance its real-time threat intelligence capabilities to match Red Canary's offerings and refine its automated response features for immediate security actions. Additionally, improvements in user interface customization could be beneficial. Red Canary may focus on reducing initial setup costs and expanding its vulnerability management to rival Tenable's comprehensive coverage. Improving integration ease with broader enterprise solutions can add further value.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable ensures a seamless deployment process with robust support for smooth system integration, catering to broader vulnerability management. It is recognized for excellent technical support and integration capabilities. Red Canary is known for quick and easy setup, with responsive support focusing on swift threat detection deployment, ensuring operational continuity and minimal disruption during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable is often viewed as cost-effective, with lower initial costs and a favorable ROI due to its extensive range of security features. Its pricing strategy is appealing for organizations looking for comprehensive solutions at a reduced cost. Red Canary tends to have higher initial costs, justified by its advanced threat detection technology. However, it offers a high ROI for companies prioritizing rapid threat response and real-time security intelligence.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Sagar Shekhar

Cyber Security Analyst at TIAA

An open-source tool that offers great automation capabilities

Red Canary MDR generates a lot of output, so it would be good if, in the end, it generates a summary of all the previous attacks and what was the outcome of a single attack, especially so that it becomes easy for the user to see the summary and analyze the whole thing. In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users.

Read full review

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Have maintained accurate vulnerability scans and gained actionable remediation insights across thousands of servers

Tenable Vulnerability Management agents are very lightweight, and the results we get are very accurate. The solutions they provide to us, assuming if one vulnerability exists, there will be a solution. The resolution they give us in wording will be the best solution. The exploit rates and the reports we get provide a lot of information, making it very easy for us to verify.The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment. That is one of the key aspects of why we have integrated Tenable to our patching tools. It has a vast capacity of pushing the data to our tools due to its capability and compatibility. That is also one of the reasons why we are using Tenable Vulnerability Management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"The valuable features of this solution are it integrates well with different EDR software, such CrowdStrike, and Carbon Black, and the information it provides is helpful."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its automation part."

"I recommended Red Canary to my friends who work in other organizations."

"The near real-time review translates into near real-time action. So, in addition to alerting, Red Canary MDR has response playbooks built out."

"The solution works well for what we use it for and the support and protection are good."

"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."

"The interface is fine."

"One of the most valuable features of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is its exportability, which allows us to conduct risk assessments efficiently."

"You can customize each point in new scans."

"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable."

"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."

"Tenable.io, in particular, is quite a powerful product. It looks at your traditional environment, which is pretty much anything that is on-premises, and it also goes a step ahead and covers your modern assets, which is anything that is currently sitting in the cloud. You get complete visibility of your entire environment and tech operation. The ability to give you visibility across the entire tech surface is one of the biggest advantages that Tenable.io has."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"In general, the solution currently fails to provide a summary to its users."

"I would like there to be an on-premise version of this solution for our data centers because of the proliferation of online threats."

"Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions."

"The price could always be better."

"The most valuable feature of Red Canary MDR is the overall threat protection it provides."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"AI integration for reporting in Tenable would be beneficial."

"The one drawback that we have found is the reports."

"The tool's reports are bad. They're not very customizable or flexible. During audits, we often have to exclude things that aren't relevant to our organization, but we can't do that easily with the reports. They come in HTML or PDF format, and we can't compare current results with previous ones in Excel because we never receive reports in Excel."

"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."

"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."

"The solution must provide penetration testing."

"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution could vary in price depending on how many endpoints a company has."

"Red Canary MDR I use is an open-source tool."

"I have not compared Red Canary to other solutions to know if the price is high or low. However, I have found the price of this solution fair and reasonable, it cost approximately $100 per year, per device. If they could provide the solution for $50 per year, per device, it would be better."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."

"A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."

"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing cost of the product. It is neither a cheap nor an expensive product."

"The solution is not too expensive."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Since we stood Zafran Security up in our private cloud, we handle the maintenance on our side. As we opted not to use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

In terms of areas for improvement, Zafran Security is doing a really great job as a new and emerging company. Oftenti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

My use cases for Zafran Security revolve around two primary areas. One is around vulnerability management and priorit...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Canary MDR?

The services are higher priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Canary MDR?

Red Canary's pricing spectrum may not be ideal for smaller financial institutions.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Canary MDR?

We use Red Canary ( /products/red-canary-reviews ) to monitor incoming and outgoing traffic. For example, when we rec...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I don't think I have any additional features to add for improvement, as Tenable Vulnerability Management does a prett...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 34% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 14% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

Nucleus vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

HackerOne vs Zafran Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Expel vs Red Canary

Compared 14% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Red Canary

Compared 14% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Red Canary

Compared 14% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 13% of the time

Rapid7 MDR vs Red Canary

Compared 8% of the time

More Red Canary Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 12% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Zafran Security

September 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

September 2025

Download Red Canary product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

September 2025

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Tenable.io

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Red Canary Managed Detection and Response (MDR) offers robust threat detection, rapid response capabilities, continuous security monitoring, and seamless integration with existing tools. Valued for its actionable reporting and proactive threat intelligence, it streamlines operations and enhances organizational efficiency and security.

Red Canary

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

DuPont, Quanta Services, Microchip Technology, Hopkins Public Schools, Henny Penny, Schumacher Homes

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

September 2025

Free Report: Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Canary vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.