Quorum OnQ vs SAP NetWeaver comparison

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use."

"From a disaster-recovery point of view, one of the things I really like is that I can test the virtual copy of the physical server on a test network and compare the servers side-by-side, without interfering with the production network. So I can see and make sure that the latest copy of the server is the physical copy of the server, without interfering with production."

"It is a stable solution."

"The solution offers good documentation."

"Being able to spin up a machine in a sandbox is amazing because it allows us to test things that we otherwise would not be able to do."

"A very high level security environment for secondary data."

"The most useful feature is the one-click recovery."

"The biggest feature is being able to do a file recovery to the original server. That is extremely useful and has saved us a few times when we've had ransomware. In some of those cases, people's computers were locked down by viruses which spread to things they had access to, including server shares. But we were easily able to just restore to four hours prior, instead of a day or two or more ago."

"The solution is scalable."

"With SAP, you can trust what it tells you."

"We strongly rely on our SAP data. We need access to the information to analyze it, so the solution allows us to make use of the data that we get from SAP. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"SAP NetWeaver is doing its job, and it performs well. In the last year, I have not had any problems with it."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of SAP NetWeaver is the integration and it is a complete solution."

"It is the central point for all our data storage. We have one single version of the truth that we can communicate to all our customers."

"The stability is not an issue, and I would rate it at seven out of ten."

"It feels to me like it's going to be a little bit more work than I originally anticipated when upgrading the appliance. I haven't done that yet so I can't speak from true experience, but I went through the project plan and it feels to me like there's quite a number of pieces and components and things that have to be done. Quorum is going to manage the rollout, but in starting the initial conversation there were a lot of unanswered questions"

"Better integration with cloud-based solutions like Azure and Office 365 is needed."

"I paid for subscription of Firewall. I paid for subscription of endpoint protection. Thet should introduce single subscription for all services."

"There seems to be a lack of technicians. Sometimes they are very busy and I don't hear back for a day or two. The technicians they have are great. They are fantastic, but it seems difficult, at times, to get in contact with anyone."

"They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments with different needs."

"They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive."

"I don't love the scheduler, as I think that interface could use an overhaul."

"I would really like it if they followed comparable products from other vendors and had an option where you could offload to tape. I know it sounds incredibly antiquated, but the benefit I see is that there would be a better air gap than you have with backing up to an online source."

"SAP NetWeaver it's still complex for a normal user unless you memorize those action codes."

"Has become somewhat unstable recently."

"It can always improve. It should have the ability to connect with other databases. It was a little bit tough to do that. I would like to have the ability to research certain markets and then integrate it with NetWeaver. I'd like to compare it with other databases from other companies being used in the world so we can integrate it with our own products to compare if we are still current on the market."

"It needs more improvement in terms of user-friendliness. SAP wasn't user-friendly at all."

"The product documentation can be improved."

"Technical support response time was slow."

"The initial setup was not very easy."

"Though SAP NetWeaver has been pretty stable and mature, some issues arose after some customizations, so that's an area for improvement."

"The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."

"I am not sure how much it costs, but I know it's expensive."

"When we first got the Quorum the licensing was different."

"The pricing is about $1,400 a month. It's a little bit on the higher side. But it's one of those situations where time is valuable for me. So if it costs a little bit more money for me to have a solution that just works and requires less of my day-to-day management, I'm willing to pay a little bit more."

"We have never questioned whether it is worth it because it so obviously is a great value."

"The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has to be renewed annually. We spent close to $6,000, between the two offices, for support."

"Quorum OnQ can be described as a medium-priced product...There are no ingress and egress charges in the product."

"The cost is higher than other software and services, but it is an absolute must-have."

"It's a very expensive solution."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a nine to ten since it is an expensive solution."

"The licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"SAP NetWeaver requires a license, but I'm not sure how the licenses and payments were coordinated."