No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Prophix vs QPR Metrics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Prophix
Ranking in Business Performance Management
17th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Financial Performance and Strategy Management (6th), Financial Close Software (15th)
QPR Metrics
Ranking in Business Performance Management
19th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Prophix is 2.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR Metrics is 2.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Prophix2.6%
QPR Metrics2.5%
Other94.9%
Business Performance Management
 

Featured Reviews

it_user287946 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at a tech services company
Easy to use and cloud-ready, helps me manage my business
Increased margin on products Easy to use Rich functionality Complete corporate performance management solution Based on modern technology Cloud-ready All of them allow me to manage my business. BI analytics Few related Ad Hoc Analyses in one window Sorting and filtering in Data View More…
WH
Change Management Consultant at a analyst firm with self employed
You can use the process mapping module to build processes that can be converted into SOPs. Licensing is unreasonable.
The process-mapping module helped the BPR team in creating detailed process maps quickly. The process converter tool helped the team establish baseline SOPs that can be taken further to implement comprehensive documentation that serves the departments’ needs. The content management part helped in sharing the processes safely with the rest of the organization.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has enabled us to cut the budgeting process by 50% as well as making the budgets more acute."
"Customer Service: It's excellent."
"The biggest achievement is that now we do not have to use spreadsheets"
"The ability to budget on individual levels, i.e. by person for payroll, by vehicle for transportation, etc."
"Words can’t express how much our company benefited from using this product."
"Easy to use Rich functionality Complete corporate performance management solution Based on modern technology Cloud-ready All of them allow me to manage my business."
"The time saved by building variables to drive accounts inside the budgeting system, along with balancing accounts to spread increases or decreases based on different accounts or versions, more than makes up for the pricing of the software."
"Easy to use Rich functionality Complete corporate performance management solution Based on modern technology Cloud-ready All of them allow me to manage my business."
"The new QPR Suite 2014 including QPR EnterpriseArchitect, QPR ProcessDesigner, QPR Metrics and QPR ProcessAnalyzer delivers the right capabilities for business management and enterprise architects to support operational development and business transformation cases."
"The product has so many features, but it has some unique ones that most of the similar products do not have."
"The process mapping module is highly user friendly and allows users to quickly build processes with thorough details that can be converted into comprehensive end-to-end SOPs."
 

Cons

"There were problems in a certain version with the speed, but they have fixed this in later versions."
"BI analytics Few related Ad Hoc Analyses in one window Sorting and filtering in Data View"
"With the report writing there are some issues."
"Discovery was not in depth enough for our deployment to be successful – we had a lot of problems and had to take short-cuts due to a lack of planning."
"I think the mobile capabilities could be improved."
"The user interface could be improved as it is not an intuitive product for every type of user."
"The Microsoft multidimensional cubes does have several disadvantages in write back solutions which results in poor performance."
"BI analytics Few related Ad Hoc Analyses in one window Sorting and filtering in Data View"
"There should be an easier way of reporting, or producing, reports in MS Office."
"Mobile features need to be improved."
"The QPR content management module is highly complex and difficult to use."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
18%
Computer Software Company
15%
Educational Organization
11%
Performing Arts
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
QPR Suite, QPR Software QPR Suite
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Solarcentury, Swan Mill Paper Company, Interstates Companies, First Medical Health Plan, Community Physician Network, AAA Southern New England
Eneco Group, Aalto University
Find out what your peers are saying about Prophix vs. QPR Metrics and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.