PlanetScale vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

PlanetScale and VMware are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. PlanetScale is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.2, while VMware is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.9. Additionally, 100% of PlanetScale users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of VMware users who would recommend it.

PlanetScale

Read 6 PlanetScale reviews

105 Views
27 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 83 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

135 Views
120 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

PlanetScale

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and PlanetScale are competitors in cloud-native data management. While VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers superior integration with its ecosystem, PlanetScale is more innovative with advanced serverless and scaling capabilities.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides comprehensive integration with VMware products, robust data management, and enterprise-grade capabilities. PlanetScale offers a serverless architecture, automatic scaling, and reliable data durability.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions can improve its ease of deployment and reduce setup complexity. Cost optimization would also enhance its appeal. For PlanetScale, expanding its integration options and offering more comprehensive enterprise support could be beneficial. Addressing these could strengthen their market positioning.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions requires significant setup time due to complex integration but benefits from strong VMware support. PlanetScale, with its serverless model, simplifies deployment and management, needing less operational effort and providing ease in setup.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions often entails higher initial costs due to its extensive features, impacting ROI. PlanetScale's cost-effective serverless model reduces resource use and achieves faster ROI, suiting modern cloud demands.

To learn more, read our detailed PlanetScale vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

PlanetScale vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PlanetScale

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (7th), Data Warehouse (9th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)

Featured Reviews

Neeraj Sameer Allu

Founder at Tuft

Manages databases in serverless environments and easy to get started with

The main thing I didn't like about PlanetScale was that we couldn't run analytical queries on it. They bill based on the number of rows read, so even a simple count query could easily use up our allocated resources. Apart from that, I actually loved it. It's based on MySQL, so it doesn't have foreign key constraints or cascades. We have to delete manually or use an ORM. As it's based on MySQL, we can use log posters for complex queries, but it only supports MySQL. I feel like Postgres is more useful for custom or complex queries.

Read full review

Sushma Polavarapu

Sr Data Analytics Consultant at Capgemini

Create essential reporting scripts with simplicity but has some operational challenges

We mainly create functions and scripts required for reporting The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views. It's just simple to use. There is general room for improvement. I have been using it for five years. I have faced stability issues, mainly…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is beginner-friendly. Like any new platform, it can be a bit confusing at first. But after spending about an hour with it, you can get a clear idea of what everything is for. It's not very confusing; I think they've improved it recently."

"The branching feature is also good for developer experience."

"I like the solution's developer experience. When you deploy changes to the database in the portal, you can use different deployment strategies and see how things work. You can put changes into different branches, like deployment and staging. This is built into the product, allowing you to navigate changes through different branches."

"The database is accessible 24/7, ensuring my project runs smoothly without interruptions."

"I did not face any downtime when using the product."

"The message routing is the most valuable feature. It is effective and flexible."

"The solution improved our site reliability."

"Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues."

"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."

"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."

"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."

"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."

"The solution's best feature is its exceptional speed, delivering efficient utilization of resources."

Cons

"I used PlanetScale for hobby projects, so my perspective differs from someone using it commercially. Unfortunately, they've removed the free tier in recent months and pivoted to a business-to-business model. This is sad for hobby developers like me because it's a great product, but I understand they have costs to cover."

"I am not sure, but I think recently, the tool removed the free version."

"We encountered some initial issues during the product deployment, which required me to search for solutions on forums."

"The main thing I didn't like about PlanetScale was that we couldn't run analytical queries on it."

"When I tried to integrate the solution with Firebase for authentication, I faced some interruptions. Also, when using it with Next.js and NextAuth.js for Google and social logins, I had some troubles."

"Lacks sufficient inbuilt machine-learning functions for complex use cases."

"VMware Tanzu Greenplum needs improvement in the memory area and improved methods for quick access to the disc. So, one of the quick goals of Greenplum must work on enhancing access to the disc by adding hints in the database."

"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues."

"Implementation takes a long time."

"Scalability issues are present."

"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."

"Some integration with other platforms like design tools, and ETL development tools, that will enable some advanced functionality, like fully down processing, etc."

"The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Last time, when I wanted to use the tool in a project, I could see it was only paid, so I didn't use the service."

"I am currently using the product's free version, which has been sufficient for my portfolio project."

"The solution is expensive for beginners. That's why I wasn't motivated to use it more. But they were already providing many features for free for beginners, which was great."

"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."

"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."

"This is an open source solution."

"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."

"Tanzu Greenplum's pricing is really competitive and gives excellent value for money."

"The pricing is okay."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PlanetScale?

I am currently using the product's free version, which has been sufficient for my portfolio project. The paid version ranges from $39 to $1,000, depending on the features and scale required.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PlanetScale?

I would like PlanetScale to have a feature where the database can be accessed in the cloud with a link, allowing for a more user-friendly interface compared to the terminal. This would make it easi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PlanetScale?

I have used PlanetScale as it is an advanced version of MySQL. It functions as a platform where MySQL is live, similar to AWS. I use PlanetScale to store data in a live environment where queries ca...

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Tanzu Greenplum?

The loading speed is very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?

It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 21% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 11% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 8% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 8% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

March 2025

Download PlanetScale product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

April 2025

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

No data available

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

PlanetScale offers seamless database management with features tailored for modern development environments, enabling enhanced project operations through efficient integration and ease of use.

PlanetScale is designed to support modern developer workflows through features like automated connection pooling and constant availability, making it ideal for serverless applications. Its integration with tools like GitHub and Prisma enhances the developer experience, allowing fast setup and effortless database interactions. However, users note challenges with analytical queries due to row-based billing and the absence of foreign key constraints. Integration with platforms such as Firebase and Next.js presents additional hurdles. Recent changes, such as the removal of the free tier, have impacted adoption by hobby developers, highlighting a need for more accessible pricing plans.

What are the most important features of PlanetScale?

Automated Connection Pooling: Optimizes database connections for serverless environments.
Constant Availability: Ensures uninterrupted operations and workflow efficiency.
Developer-Friendly: Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and Prisma for enhanced project management.
Quick Setup: Simplifies setup processes in corporate environments, allowing immediate use.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating PlanetScale?

Uninterrupted Project Operations: Facilitates constant availability for high-performance applications.
Enhanced Developer Experience: Offers intuitive integrations and project management capabilities.
Ease of Integration: Works well with popular tools like Prisma and MySQL for efficient workflows.

PlanetScale finds significant use in hosting databases for portfolios, company websites, and academic projects. Its compatibility with Prisma facilitates seamless MySQL database management online. Users leverage its capabilities for analytical queries and manage data environments effectively. Teams value the platform for specialized tasks such as URL shortening and social media automation, which are crucial in rapidly evolving digital industries.

PlanetScale

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

VMware

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

PlanetScale vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

April 2025

Free Report: PlanetScale vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about PlanetScale vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PlanetScale vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.