Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Panorama Necto vs Phocas comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Panorama Necto
Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
48th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Reporting (30th), Data Visualization (27th)
Phocas
Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
60th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category, the mindshare of Panorama Necto is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Phocas is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AS
The infographics feature is unique to Necto. However, they need better tutorials and community support.
The best feature I liked is the infographics which is great and it's best unique feature. It helps developers use existing infographics from the library or they can create their own and present to end users It's quite easy to create reports in Necto using the infographics feature. Collaboration…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Also Known As

Panorama Necto
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Neopharm
Repco, Gazman, BUNZL, Dahlsens, ThermoFisher Scientific, Vic's Meats
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and others in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools. Updated: July 2025.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.