Panaya Test Dynamix vs Testim comparison

Panaya and Testim are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Panaya is ranked #26, while Testim is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7. Panaya holds a 1.3% mindshare in FT, compared to Testim’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Panaya users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Testim users who would recommend it.

Panaya Test Dynamix

Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews

791 Views
370 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

1,581 Views
995 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Panaya Test Dynamix

Testim

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Panaya Test Dynamix and Testim are competitors in the software testing market. Based on our comparison, Testim has the upper hand due to its advanced AI-driven features.

Features: Panaya Test Dynamix provides robust change analysis and impact estimation to manage risks effectively, a sprint feature for organizing development cycles, and a customizable workflow system. Testim offers AI-driven test automation, advanced real-time test creation, and adaptive testing functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Panaya Test Dynamix could enhance its AI capabilities, improve real-time test automation, and expand cloud deployment options. Testim could benefit from better integration with enterprise systems, more flexible on-premise solutions, and cost-reduction strategies for its AI features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Panaya Test Dynamix integrates seamlessly with enterprise systems and offers comprehensive support. Testim's cloud-based model reduces setup complexity, and it is noted for proactive customer service and quick issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Panaya Test Dynamix offers competitive pricing, emphasizing low setup costs and maximized ROI through risk management. Testim, though more costly upfront, delivers long-term value for businesses needing advanced automation benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Testim Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Testim

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Panaya Test Dynamix

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Defect Tracking (7th), Test Management Tools (19th), Regression Testing Tools (14th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.5%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Alain Vanhaeght

IT Project leader at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options

For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.

Read full review

Dheeraj Bavirisetty

Senior Consultant at Eviden France

Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code

We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools."

"The test repository to follow the test progress is most valuable because we can easily create and manage a huge number of test scripts. We can copy and paste, replicate, and drag and drop many tests scripts. We can create test scripts en masse. When you have a high volume of tests, the tool is quite useful. It works well when you want to manage a lot of tests, such as you have 1,000 or more test scripts."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary."

"The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use."

"Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format."

"Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"The product is easy to use."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

More Testim pros

Cons

"The setup of Panaya Recorder is a bit complex. Panaya is a SaaS application, but you need to install some components on your computer. You need to set up your computer to allow Panaya Recorder to work. There are five or six things to do each time you install Panaya for any user. If you miss something, Panaya Recorder doesn't work. So, it is complex to install."

"It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories and we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we have a network connection."

"Support is reactive and in English only."

"They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a basic license."

"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

"The solution is not expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

16%

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 61% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 10% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 10% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 5% of the time

More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 45% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 14% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 7% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

June 2025

Download Panaya Test Dynamix product report

Buyer's Guide

Testim

May 2025

Download Testim product report

Overview

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

Panaya

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim

Sample Customers

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Testim

June 2025

Free Report: Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Testim

Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Testim report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.