No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Palantir Foundry vs Seeq comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palantir Foundry
Ranking in Data and Analytics Service Providers
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (2nd), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Supply Chain Analytics (1st), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Data Migration Appliances (2nd), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (1st)
Seeq
Ranking in Data and Analytics Service Providers
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Data and Analytics Service Providers category, the mindshare of Palantir Foundry is 9.9%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seeq is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data and Analytics Service Providers Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Palantir Foundry9.9%
Seeq1.5%
Other88.6%
Data and Analytics Service Providers
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2846265 - PeerSpot reviewer
PALANTIR DATA ENGINEER at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Unified healthcare pipelines have improved data trust and accelerated operational decisions
One challenge regarding how Palantir Foundry can be improved is the learning curve. Foundry has a very broad ecosystem with Ontology, Pipeline Builder, Code Repositories, and AI integrations. For new engineers or business users onboarding, it can take time, especially if they are coming from more traditional data platforms. Better documentation, simplified onboarding paths, and more beginner-friendly examples would help accelerate adoption. Another area is debugging complexity. While lineage and monitoring are strong features, troubleshooting deeply interconnected pipelines can still become difficult in a large enterprise environment. Sometimes error logs and pipeline failure messages could be more descriptive or developer-friendly, especially for distributed PySpark jobs. Another pain point is customization limitations in certain UI-driven components. While low-code tools are great for rapid development, highly customized workflows sometimes still require engineering workarounds or deeper technical implementation. The platform is extremely capable, but improvements around usability, debugging experience, DevOps flexibility, and ecosystem openness would make it even more effective for enterprise engineering teams.
Suradech Kongkiatpaiboon - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Process Engineer at Chevron
Centralized analytics has transformed time series optimization and collaboration across teams
In my opinion, the best feature Seeq offers is the ability to visualize time series data in an efficient way. If we code it by ourselves, it will take a very long time or require a lot of server capacity, and you cannot simply plot a time series of, say, 100,000 records on your own simply because it takes a lot of effort to do that. Analyzing it when we apply any formula or algorithm takes more time to finalize everything. Seeq does this through drag and drop and point and click actions. So, it is much easier to do it by using this tool. Seeq has positively impacted my organization because I see many people using it, compared to the past five years when we had only PI Vision for visualizing time series data. Manipulating time series data was such a critical task that not many people were familiar with and were afraid to do. This task remains a core critical function for everyone to do it efficiently in order to complete anything. Process optimization and reliability analysis would address all failure modes.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best features Palantir Foundry offers for my work include that building the ontology is very easy and it is easy to use."
"Palantir Foundry has positively impacted my organization, especially Airbus, as we are dependent on Palantir Foundry for processing the data."
"Palantir Foundry is one of the most advanced tools right now, in my opinion, and it would take over the world very soon."
"It has been the platform for end to end data processing, manipulations, and reporting, greatly improved org's data reporting effort."
"Based on my experience, Palantir Foundry is extremely easy to learn and adjust to since it is primarily a closed system, meaning that all the functions for data ingestion, data cleaning, machine learning, and related tasks can be performed from within the same system."
"The ease of use is my favorite feature. We're able to build different models and projects or combine different projects to build one use case."
"The predictive analytics capability within Palantir Foundry impacts financial forecasting strategies through its AIP functionality, which includes numerous pre-built models, LLMs, and data science application libraries."
"Palantir Foundry is not just a data platform; it actually connects data engineering, analytics, operations, and decision-making all into one ecosystem."
"I have seen a return on investment as I saved a lot of millions of dollars for my business unit since we started using Seeq."
"The predictive analytics features have been instrumental in catching excursions early, allowing us to monitor conditions proactively and prevent issues from escalating."
"Seeq has positively impacted my organization by making work more effective, as it used to take months to collect data, model, and filter, but now Seeq saves time, allowing us to complete tasks in a week or less."
"Of course, when data is processed correctly, all three outcomes—saving time, reducing downtime, and improving efficiency—are achievable."
"I've used the prediction part to create different inferences in my industry."
"It's an analytical tool, so it supports all the analytical problems. That is the reason we chose Seeq."
"The product is stable."
"Seeq has positively impacted my organization, and I can share a specific outcome where we have found a new metric on an important piece of equipment to raise the flag when it is underperforming."
 

Cons

"I cannot advise someone to use Palantir Foundry due to cost efficiency and the complexity it introduces in handling large amounts of data."
"The widgets are pretty limited."
"However, a disadvantage is the challenge of connecting data to and from Palantir, which requires coordination with data engineers."
"The Workshop application could be improved because it is not very customizable, but it is still very strong."
"From an organizational perspective, it is advisable to note that initially, the cost may be low, but as time passes, cost can be a significant factor in deciding whether to continue using Palantir Foundry or not, so those considerations should be taken into account."
"There are still a lot of changes required in Palantir Foundry to make it more usable or easy to use."
"The one area where improvement could be made is the cost of the solution which is quite expensive."
"It would be helpful to build applications based on Azure functions or web apps in Palantir Foundry."
"It would be wonderful if a time series model could be built with the thermodynamic package."
"Seeq could incorporate more closed-loop solutions."
"Sometimes the software would be a bit slow to respond, and that may be because there were too many users at once."
"Regarding AI, I wish Seeq had AI capabilities. For instance, if Seeq could analyze graphs and offer recommendations, it would be advantageous. Currently, there is no AI feature in Seeq. In terms of improvements, it would be great if Seeq could enhance its data export features and possibly integrate more functionalities to reduce the need for multiple software tools. I would like a specific feature related to predictive analysis, which Seeq currently lacks."
"I think Seeq could improve by including a section that has SQL-type visualizations to visualize tables of data and not reference them to the timestamp, as that has caused us some problems at times."
"In Seeq Organizer, we've realized that process engineers want dashboards with more drag-and-drop features, like Power BI."
"We face a bit of an issue if there are any server issues or upgrades from Seeq."
"I believe Seeq can be improved because report rollouts on similar pieces of equipment can be challenging."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Palantir Foundry is an expensive solution."
"Palantir Foundry has different pricing models that can be negotiated."
"The solution’s pricing is high."
"It's expensive."
"The pricing is average."
"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data and Analytics Service Providers solutions are best for your needs.
915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
28%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Construction Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise51
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Palantir Foundry?
The Workshop application could be improved because it is not very customizable, but it is still very strong. We also have the React OSK apps, but it does not allow the inbuilt applications such as ...
What is your primary use case for Palantir Foundry?
My main use case for Palantir Foundry is to solve business problems, such as in healthcare. I also worked on a project for a law firm where thousands of PDFs were coming in, and we needed to check ...
What advice do you have for others considering Palantir Foundry?
I believe they should get started by completing all the free certificates, then they could apply to the paid certificates to get a master of Palantir Foundry, solve some real use cases, do examples...
What needs improvement with Seeq?
I believe Seeq can be improved because report rollouts on similar pieces of equipment can be challenging. If Seeq had an easier way to modify our tag structure, then duplicating reports onto simila...
What is your primary use case for Seeq?
My main use case for Seeq is incident investigations. Upon unexpected quality results, incident investigations can start to determine where the incident first began occurring. Seeq allows the retro...
What advice do you have for others considering Seeq?
My advice to others looking into using Seeq is to pursue it. There are more opportunities with your own equipment than you know without examining them through the lens of Seeq. I would rate this pr...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Merck KGaA, Airbus, Ferrari,United States Intelligence Community, United States Department of Defense
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palantir Foundry vs. Seeq and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.