No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Palantir Foundry vs Seeq comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palantir Foundry
Ranking in Data and Analytics Service Providers
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (3rd), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Supply Chain Analytics (1st), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Data Migration Appliances (2nd), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (1st)
Seeq
Ranking in Data and Analytics Service Providers
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data and Analytics Service Providers category, the mindshare of Palantir Foundry is 8.4%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seeq is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data and Analytics Service Providers Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Palantir Foundry8.4%
Seeq1.3%
Other90.3%
Data and Analytics Service Providers
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2846265 - PeerSpot reviewer
PALANTIR DATA ENGINEER at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Unified healthcare pipelines have improved data trust and accelerated operational decisions
One challenge regarding how Palantir Foundry can be improved is the learning curve. Foundry has a very broad ecosystem with Ontology, Pipeline Builder, Code Repositories, and AI integrations. For new engineers or business users onboarding, it can take time, especially if they are coming from more traditional data platforms. Better documentation, simplified onboarding paths, and more beginner-friendly examples would help accelerate adoption. Another area is debugging complexity. While lineage and monitoring are strong features, troubleshooting deeply interconnected pipelines can still become difficult in a large enterprise environment. Sometimes error logs and pipeline failure messages could be more descriptive or developer-friendly, especially for distributed PySpark jobs. Another pain point is customization limitations in certain UI-driven components. While low-code tools are great for rapid development, highly customized workflows sometimes still require engineering workarounds or deeper technical implementation. The platform is extremely capable, but improvements around usability, debugging experience, DevOps flexibility, and ecosystem openness would make it even more effective for enterprise engineering teams.
Suradech Kongkiatpaiboon - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Process Engineer at Chevron
Centralized analytics has transformed time series optimization and collaboration across teams
In my opinion, the best feature Seeq offers is the ability to visualize time series data in an efficient way. If we code it by ourselves, it will take a very long time or require a lot of server capacity, and you cannot simply plot a time series of, say, 100,000 records on your own simply because it takes a lot of effort to do that. Analyzing it when we apply any formula or algorithm takes more time to finalize everything. Seeq does this through drag and drop and point and click actions. So, it is much easier to do it by using this tool. Seeq has positively impacted my organization because I see many people using it, compared to the past five years when we had only PI Vision for visualizing time series data. Manipulating time series data was such a critical task that not many people were familiar with and were afraid to do. This task remains a core critical function for everyone to do it efficiently in order to complete anything. Process optimization and reliability analysis would address all failure modes.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Foundry's data visualization is fantastic."
"This product has all the various components for getting data, transforming it and visually creating the dashboards without the need to integrate things and no need to check the compatibility."
"Compared to other SaaS tools, Palantir Foundry is definitely a time-saver, though I do not have specific metrics to share."
"Palantir Foundry has positively impacted our organization by making our processes straightforward and fast-moving, especially with features like AIP, an AI-powered assistance, and the low-code ability to create transformations quickly, which has benefited me significantly."
"In terms of improvements, it helped us improve our data migration timelines by approximately 60 percent and improved the data accuracy and addressed the issues upfront by approximately 85 percent."
"Previously, the team used to take more than a week to gather data for a particular entity and make it ready for downstream use cases, and that was reduced from seven days to close to 30 to 45 minutes because everything was automated using pipelines and schedules."
"Palantir Foundry is one of the most advanced tools right now, in my opinion, and it would take over the world very soon."
"The best features Palantir Foundry offers include the semantic layer providing schema-level understanding about the data, low-code and no-code integration for ease without coding in the pipeline builder, AI Assist for assistance, Ontology for digital twin relationships, branching in pipeline level and Foundry branching for better management, zero-copy architecture for querying without massive data, data lineage for troubleshooting, and security changes that can be made in the pipeline builder and Ontology Workshop."
"Seeq is a friendly and useful tool."
"I've used the prediction part to create different inferences in my industry."
"The initial setup is very easy. I've installed and upgraded Seeq in the remote agent service."
"The product is stable."
"I recommend Seeq to others looking into using it because it is perfect."
"Seeq only needed me to complete the task, so it saved other people's time, and it saved my time by being easy to use and thereby also saving money."
"It's an analytical tool, so it supports all the analytical problems. That is the reason we chose Seeq."
"The tool is user-friendly."
 

Cons

"The one area where improvement could be made is the cost of the solution which is quite expensive."
"The workflow could be improved."
"It is a very complicated platform, and you need to understand a lot about how to use it and the underlying thinking behind Foundry."
"There is not a wide user base for the solution's online documentation so it is sometimes difficult to find answers."
"However, Palantir Foundry's license fees comparative to others are quite high."
"However, a disadvantage is the challenge of connecting data to and from Palantir, which requires coordination with data engineers."
"Customer support should definitely be a concern, especially for the dev tier account I have been using, while for a corporate account, it is pretty good."
"I would add that live data streaming is very hard and it keeps breaking, so it is not very stable and depends a lot on the satellite network."
"As for improvements, I felt there should be a more efficient way to address repetitive customer questions, perhaps using chatbot technology to streamline responses."
"I have noticed that Seeq sometimes struggles with connectivity issues, leading to data gaps."
"The dashboard, where we approve the dashboard, is not ideal for someone who uses Seeq only as a tool to see data in a report format."
"Regarding AI, I wish Seeq had AI capabilities. For instance, if Seeq could analyze graphs and offer recommendations, it would be advantageous. Currently, there is no AI feature in Seeq. In terms of improvements, it would be great if Seeq could enhance its data export features and possibly integrate more functionalities to reduce the need for multiple software tools. I would like a specific feature related to predictive analysis, which Seeq currently lacks."
"In Seeq Organizer, we've realized that process engineers want dashboards with more drag-and-drop features, like Power BI."
"Seeq could work on the reporting format and dashboard."
"I appreciate the question on how Seeq can be improved. The first thing is their graphical user interface. They invest so much in their backbone, but without a good dashboard or visualization tool, it feels insufficient."
"The ease of working is an issue, as the user interface of Seeq looks a little bit more professional with an industrial look, and it can be made a bit more user-friendly if we compare it to the reliability of other packages like Tableau."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Palantir Foundry is an expensive solution."
"The solution’s pricing is high."
"Palantir Foundry has different pricing models that can be negotiated."
"It's expensive."
"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."
"The pricing is average."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data and Analytics Service Providers solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
27%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Construction Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise50
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Palantir Foundry?
The Workshop application could be improved because it is not very customizable, but it is still very strong. We also have the React OSK apps, but it does not allow the inbuilt applications such as ...
What is your primary use case for Palantir Foundry?
My main use case for Palantir Foundry is to solve business problems, such as in healthcare. I also worked on a project for a law firm where thousands of PDFs were coming in, and we needed to check ...
What advice do you have for others considering Palantir Foundry?
I believe they should get started by completing all the free certificates, then they could apply to the paid certificates to get a master of Palantir Foundry, solve some real use cases, do examples...
What needs improvement with Seeq?
I believe Seeq can be improved because report rollouts on similar pieces of equipment can be challenging. If Seeq had an easier way to modify our tag structure, then duplicating reports onto simila...
What is your primary use case for Seeq?
My main use case for Seeq is incident investigations. Upon unexpected quality results, incident investigations can start to determine where the incident first began occurring. Seeq allows the retro...
What advice do you have for others considering Seeq?
My advice to others looking into using Seeq is to pursue it. There are more opportunities with your own equipment than you know without examining them through the lens of Seeq. I would rate this pr...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Merck KGaA, Airbus, Ferrari,United States Intelligence Community, United States Department of Defense
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palantir Foundry vs. Seeq and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.