No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Palantir Foundry vs Seeq comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palantir Foundry
Ranking in Data and Analytics Service Providers
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (3rd), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Supply Chain Analytics (1st), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Data Migration Appliances (2nd), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (1st)
Seeq
Ranking in Data and Analytics Service Providers
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Data and Analytics Service Providers category, the mindshare of Palantir Foundry is 7.6%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seeq is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data and Analytics Service Providers Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Palantir Foundry7.6%
Seeq1.3%
Other91.1%
Data and Analytics Service Providers
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2846265 - PeerSpot reviewer
PALANTIR DATA ENGINEER at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Unified healthcare pipelines have improved data trust and accelerated operational decisions
One challenge regarding how Palantir Foundry can be improved is the learning curve. Foundry has a very broad ecosystem with Ontology, Pipeline Builder, Code Repositories, and AI integrations. For new engineers or business users onboarding, it can take time, especially if they are coming from more traditional data platforms. Better documentation, simplified onboarding paths, and more beginner-friendly examples would help accelerate adoption. Another area is debugging complexity. While lineage and monitoring are strong features, troubleshooting deeply interconnected pipelines can still become difficult in a large enterprise environment. Sometimes error logs and pipeline failure messages could be more descriptive or developer-friendly, especially for distributed PySpark jobs. Another pain point is customization limitations in certain UI-driven components. While low-code tools are great for rapid development, highly customized workflows sometimes still require engineering workarounds or deeper technical implementation. The platform is extremely capable, but improvements around usability, debugging experience, DevOps flexibility, and ecosystem openness would make it even more effective for enterprise engineering teams.
Suradech Kongkiatpaiboon - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Process Engineer at Chevron
Centralized analytics has transformed time series optimization and collaboration across teams
In my opinion, the best feature Seeq offers is the ability to visualize time series data in an efficient way. If we code it by ourselves, it will take a very long time or require a lot of server capacity, and you cannot simply plot a time series of, say, 100,000 records on your own simply because it takes a lot of effort to do that. Analyzing it when we apply any formula or algorithm takes more time to finalize everything. Seeq does this through drag and drop and point and click actions. So, it is much easier to do it by using this tool. Seeq has positively impacted my organization because I see many people using it, compared to the past five years when we had only PI Vision for visualizing time series data. Manipulating time series data was such a critical task that not many people were familiar with and were afraid to do. This task remains a core critical function for everyone to do it efficiently in order to complete anything. Process optimization and reliability analysis would address all failure modes.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Palantir Foundry has positively impacted my organization, especially Airbus, as we are dependent on Palantir Foundry for processing the data."
"In my experience, the best features Palantir Foundry offers include the ontology and the possibility to create a digital twin of your company."
"Palantir Foundry has positively impacted my organization with over 200 projects completed efficiently and effectively, and they are very complex projects."
"Previously, the team used to take more than a week to gather data for a particular entity and make it ready for downstream use cases, and that was reduced from seven days to close to 30 to 45 minutes because everything was automated using pipelines and schedules."
"Palantir Foundry has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to deliver projects quicker, as it organizes data from across the world into a dashboard that can be managed in one single location, accelerating business decisions made by the leadership team."
"In my experience, the best features Palantir Foundry offers are its usefulness for all levels of people from analysts to product managers to software engineers."
"Palantir Foundry has proven to be a great tool in terms of scalability for me, especially compared to Power BI, which felt inadequate, as its scalability depends on the Slate application and I am only limited by my imagination."
"Based on my experience, Palantir Foundry is extremely easy to learn and adjust to since it is primarily a closed system, meaning that all the functions for data ingestion, data cleaning, machine learning, and related tasks can be performed from within the same system."
"This resulted in a net savings of approximately one million dollars of extra product per year."
"Of course, when data is processed correctly, all three outcomes—saving time, reducing downtime, and improving efficiency—are achievable."
"I've used the prediction part to create different inferences in my industry."
"I like Seeq because it’s very useful for production surveillance. It provides detailed insights, like the ability to view data down to the minute, which is helpful for tracking when a well goes offline. This feature is particularly beneficial for our needs. However, we don’t use Seeq for predictive analytics; we handle that with other software."
"What I liked most about Seeq was its user-friendly design."
"The initial setup is very easy. I've installed and upgraded Seeq in the remote agent service."
"Seeq is not a tool that requires a programming background; it's just a point-and-click tool for everyone, and the idea behind Seeq is democratizing data analytics for everyone."
"It is a user-friendly tool, and Seeq is a good application where we can easily access it."
 

Cons

"Cost of this solution is quite high."
"The widgets are pretty limited."
"One challenge regarding how Palantir Foundry can be improved is the learning curve."
"The solution’s data security could be improved."
"They do not have a data center in Europe, and we have lots of personally identifiable information in our dataset that needs to be hosted by a third-party data center like Amazon or Microsoft Azure."
"There are some limitations when dealing with a large-scale project."
"The solution's visualization and analysis could be improved."
"I rate Palantir Foundry five out of 10. I'm ambivalent."
"The solution does not break down, but there will be a delay in buffering or caching if you are caching data for more than ten years."
"I appreciate the question on how Seeq can be improved. The first thing is their graphical user interface. They invest so much in their backbone, but without a good dashboard or visualization tool, it feels insufficient."
"In Seeq Organizer, we've realized that process engineers want dashboards with more drag-and-drop features, like Power BI."
"Seeq could work on the reporting format and dashboard."
"I would say Seeq can be improved by including a feature where instead of just having the tag name, it is actually spelled out because it was difficult whenever we were trying to find certain things."
"Sometimes the software would be a bit slow to respond, and that may be because there were too many users at once."
"The algorithm features could be better."
"I think Seeq could improve by including a section that has SQL-type visualizations to visualize tables of data and not reference them to the timestamp, as that has caused us some problems at times."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive."
"Palantir Foundry is an expensive solution."
"Palantir Foundry has different pricing models that can be negotiated."
"The solution’s pricing is high."
"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."
"The pricing is average."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data and Analytics Service Providers solutions are best for your needs.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
University
6%
Manufacturing Company
28%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Construction Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise50
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Palantir Foundry?
I think the things that I do not like about Palantir Foundry is not a Palantir issue so much as it is from my company side and what they have commissioned for and have not commissioned for. With Pa...
What is your primary use case for Palantir Foundry?
I use Palantir Foundry to ingest data and create visualizations for decisions.
What needs improvement with Seeq?
I believe Seeq can be improved because report rollouts on similar pieces of equipment can be challenging. If Seeq had an easier way to modify our tag structure, then duplicating reports onto simila...
What is your primary use case for Seeq?
My main use case for Seeq is incident investigations. Upon unexpected quality results, incident investigations can start to determine where the incident first began occurring. Seeq allows the retro...
What advice do you have for others considering Seeq?
My advice to others looking into using Seeq is to pursue it. There are more opportunities with your own equipment than you know without examining them through the lens of Seeq. I would rate this pr...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Merck KGaA, Airbus, Ferrari,United States Intelligence Community, United States Department of Defense
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palantir Foundry vs. Seeq and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.