We performed a comparison between Oracle GoldenGate and SAS Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."It is a scalable solution."
"The product's microservice architecture is scalable."
"The product is reliable for data integrity."
"One feature that stands out for me is the data center capability."
"With Oracle GoldenGate, you can easily sync the tables and put them into the ODS database."
"What I like most about Oracle GoldenGate is that it supports cross-platform migrations. For example, Oracle GoldenGate could pump data from one type of system to another such as the data from Oracle DB to SQL Db2."
"Oracle GoldenGate features work fine, which is what I like about it. I also like that it's scalable, easy to set up, and has good technical support."
"Data migration is the most valuable feature of Oracle GoldenGate."
"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."
"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."
"What needs improvement in Oracle GoldenGate is the support. Another feature that needs to be improved in the solution is its GUI. It would be useful for programmers or users to be able to work from the GUI, not just from the command line. Simplifying how Oracle GoldenGate is used would also make the solution better."
"The solution, in general, should be easier to use, with less need to perform workarounds within the system."
"Oracle GoldenGate could improve the price."
"Lacks the ability to become a full-scale ETL tool."
"It's stable but you have to know how to maintain it. That's why it's not 10 out of 10 for me. There are some bugs, there are some issues here and there. All of a sudden your process is not working and you have to figure out why, and sometimes it's not so clear."
"You cannot put everything in Golden Gate for the license and large models."
"In the future, I would appreciate a more user-friendly monitoring interface for easier management and troubleshooting."
"The solution is quite costly, and if they could reduce their pricing, it would be more economical to implement."
"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."
"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."
"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."
Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews while SAS Access is ranked 42nd in Data Integration with 3 reviews. Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2, while SAS Access is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Access writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible". Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), whereas SAS Access is most compared with Delphix, SSIS, Zapier and Toad Data Point.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
